利用实际数据估算新生儿重症监护室凝血检测的妊娠年龄特异性参考区间。

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
Natasha Lalos , Zachary Vesoulis , Carly Maucione , Charles Eby , Dennis J. Dietzen , Stephen M. Roper , Nicholas C. Spies
{"title":"利用实际数据估算新生儿重症监护室凝血检测的妊娠年龄特异性参考区间。","authors":"Natasha Lalos ,&nbsp;Zachary Vesoulis ,&nbsp;Carly Maucione ,&nbsp;Charles Eby ,&nbsp;Dennis J. Dietzen ,&nbsp;Stephen M. Roper ,&nbsp;Nicholas C. Spies","doi":"10.1016/j.jtha.2024.08.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Interpretation of coagulation testing in neonates currently relies on reference intervals (RIs) defined from older patient cohorts. Direct RI studies are difficult, but indirect estimation may allow us to infer normative neonatal distributions from routinely collected clinical data.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Assess the utility of indirect reference interval methods in estimating coagulation reference intervals in critically ill neonates.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We analyzed first-in-life coagulation testing results from all patients admitted to a level IV neonatal intensive care unit between January 1, 2018, and January 1, 2024. Results obtained after transfusion of any blood product were excluded. Indirect RIs were estimated across gestational age groups using <em>refineR</em> and compared with currently reported intervals for patients less than 1 year of age.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Prothrombin times (PTs) and international normalized ratios (INRs) were available for 1128 neonates, while activated partial thromboplastin times (APTTs) were available for 790 neonates. The indirect RI was 10 to 25 seconds in preterm, 10 to 22 seconds in term, and 10 to 24 seconds in all neonates for PT; 0.7 to 2.1 in preterm, 0.8 to 1.8 in term, and 0.8 to 1.9 in all neonates for INR; and 25 to 68 seconds in preterm, 25 to 58 seconds in term, and 25 to 62 seconds in all neonates for APTT. Compared with our current intervals, the indirect RIs would flag 58% fewer PT, 43% fewer INR, and 17% fewer APTT results as abnormal.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Indirectly estimated RIs in neonates admitted to intensive care show substantial divergence from current, first-year-of-life RIs, leading to an abundance of abnormal flags. The associations between these flags and provider behavior, transfusion practice, or clinical outcomes are areas of future exploration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17326,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis","volume":"22 12","pages":"Pages 3473-3478"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimation of gestational age-specific reference intervals for coagulation assays in a neonatal intensive care unit using real-world data\",\"authors\":\"Natasha Lalos ,&nbsp;Zachary Vesoulis ,&nbsp;Carly Maucione ,&nbsp;Charles Eby ,&nbsp;Dennis J. Dietzen ,&nbsp;Stephen M. Roper ,&nbsp;Nicholas C. Spies\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jtha.2024.08.017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Interpretation of coagulation testing in neonates currently relies on reference intervals (RIs) defined from older patient cohorts. Direct RI studies are difficult, but indirect estimation may allow us to infer normative neonatal distributions from routinely collected clinical data.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Assess the utility of indirect reference interval methods in estimating coagulation reference intervals in critically ill neonates.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We analyzed first-in-life coagulation testing results from all patients admitted to a level IV neonatal intensive care unit between January 1, 2018, and January 1, 2024. Results obtained after transfusion of any blood product were excluded. Indirect RIs were estimated across gestational age groups using <em>refineR</em> and compared with currently reported intervals for patients less than 1 year of age.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Prothrombin times (PTs) and international normalized ratios (INRs) were available for 1128 neonates, while activated partial thromboplastin times (APTTs) were available for 790 neonates. The indirect RI was 10 to 25 seconds in preterm, 10 to 22 seconds in term, and 10 to 24 seconds in all neonates for PT; 0.7 to 2.1 in preterm, 0.8 to 1.8 in term, and 0.8 to 1.9 in all neonates for INR; and 25 to 68 seconds in preterm, 25 to 58 seconds in term, and 25 to 62 seconds in all neonates for APTT. Compared with our current intervals, the indirect RIs would flag 58% fewer PT, 43% fewer INR, and 17% fewer APTT results as abnormal.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Indirectly estimated RIs in neonates admitted to intensive care show substantial divergence from current, first-year-of-life RIs, leading to an abundance of abnormal flags. The associations between these flags and provider behavior, transfusion practice, or clinical outcomes are areas of future exploration.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis\",\"volume\":\"22 12\",\"pages\":\"Pages 3473-3478\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1538783624005324\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1538783624005324","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景目前,对新生儿凝血检测结果的解释主要依赖于根据年龄较大的患者队列确定的参考区间(RI)。我们分析了 2018 年 1 月 1 日至 2024 年 1 月 1 日期间入住 IV 级新生儿重症监护病房的所有患者的首次生命凝血检测结果。不包括输注任何血液制品后获得的结果。结果1128名新生儿的凝血酶原时间(PT)和国际正常化比率(INR)可用,790名新生儿的活化部分凝血活酶时间(aPTT)可用。早产儿的 PT 间接 RI 为 10-25,足月儿为 10-22,所有新生儿为 10-24;早产儿的 INR 为 0.7-2.1,足月儿为 0.8-1.8,所有新生儿为 0.8-1.9;早产儿的 aPTT 为 25-68,足月儿为 25-58,所有新生儿为 25-62。结论重症监护室收治的新生儿中,间接估计的 RI 与当前的新生儿第一年 RI 有很大差异,导致了大量异常标记。这些标记与医疗服务提供者的行为、输血实践或临床结果之间的关联是未来需要探索的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Estimation of gestational age-specific reference intervals for coagulation assays in a neonatal intensive care unit using real-world data

Background

Interpretation of coagulation testing in neonates currently relies on reference intervals (RIs) defined from older patient cohorts. Direct RI studies are difficult, but indirect estimation may allow us to infer normative neonatal distributions from routinely collected clinical data.

Objective

Assess the utility of indirect reference interval methods in estimating coagulation reference intervals in critically ill neonates.

Methods

We analyzed first-in-life coagulation testing results from all patients admitted to a level IV neonatal intensive care unit between January 1, 2018, and January 1, 2024. Results obtained after transfusion of any blood product were excluded. Indirect RIs were estimated across gestational age groups using refineR and compared with currently reported intervals for patients less than 1 year of age.

Results

Prothrombin times (PTs) and international normalized ratios (INRs) were available for 1128 neonates, while activated partial thromboplastin times (APTTs) were available for 790 neonates. The indirect RI was 10 to 25 seconds in preterm, 10 to 22 seconds in term, and 10 to 24 seconds in all neonates for PT; 0.7 to 2.1 in preterm, 0.8 to 1.8 in term, and 0.8 to 1.9 in all neonates for INR; and 25 to 68 seconds in preterm, 25 to 58 seconds in term, and 25 to 62 seconds in all neonates for APTT. Compared with our current intervals, the indirect RIs would flag 58% fewer PT, 43% fewer INR, and 17% fewer APTT results as abnormal.

Conclusion

Indirectly estimated RIs in neonates admitted to intensive care show substantial divergence from current, first-year-of-life RIs, leading to an abundance of abnormal flags. The associations between these flags and provider behavior, transfusion practice, or clinical outcomes are areas of future exploration.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
24.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
321
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (JTH) serves as the official journal of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. It is dedicated to advancing science related to thrombosis, bleeding disorders, and vascular biology through the dissemination and exchange of information and ideas within the global research community. Types of Publications: The journal publishes a variety of content, including: Original research reports State-of-the-art reviews Brief reports Case reports Invited commentaries on publications in the Journal Forum articles Correspondence Announcements Scope of Contributions: Editors invite contributions from both fundamental and clinical domains. These include: Basic manuscripts on blood coagulation and fibrinolysis Studies on proteins and reactions related to thrombosis and haemostasis Research on blood platelets and their interactions with other biological systems, such as the vessel wall, blood cells, and invading organisms Clinical manuscripts covering various topics including venous thrombosis, arterial disease, hemophilia, bleeding disorders, and platelet diseases Clinical manuscripts may encompass etiology, diagnostics, prognosis, prevention, and treatment strategies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信