无法使用残耳的小耳症分类和两阶段耳廓重建术第一阶段的技术。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Bei He,Bingqing Wang,Qingguo Zhang
{"title":"无法使用残耳的小耳症分类和两阶段耳廓重建术第一阶段的技术。","authors":"Bei He,Bingqing Wang,Qingguo Zhang","doi":"10.1097/sap.0000000000004103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nThe remnant ear is a very important material in auricular reconstruction surgery; its dimension, position, and shape determine how it is used. However, the local conditions of microtia patients are complex and variable. Situations may be encountered where a series of abnormal remnant ears cannot be utilized in clinical practice. Currently, there are no literature that elaborates on this type of microtia and provides systematic treatment methods. The purpose of this article is to systematically classify them and optimize the two-stage method auricular reconstruction, to provide an effective surgical method for these patients.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nBased on the size, shape, and relative position of the residual ears, the unusable remnant ears were classified into three types: tiny size, abnormal shape, and relative position anomaly (over 1-cm higher than the contralateral earlobe). Fifty-three microtia patients with unusable remnant ear (54 ears) who underwent two-stage auricular reconstruction from August 2020 to August 2023 were reviewed. All patients had experienced earlobe reconstruction by using autologous rib cartilage during the first stage of surgery. Aesthetic assessments were evaluated from the naturalness of the earlobe reconstructed with autologous rib cartilage and the connection with the overall framework. The data on any complications that occurred during the follow-up period and patient satisfaction were collected.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nAmong all patients, 31 had tiny size, 14 had abnormal shape, and 8 had excessively high positions. Patients were followed up for an average period of 9.2 months (6 to 12 months). No complex complications such as infection, skin necrosis, or cartilage exposure occurred. Fifty patients (94.3%) achieved excellent or good aesthetic outcomes. Fifty-one patients (96.2%) were satisfied with the reconstruction outcomes.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nAn accurate assessment of the residual ear preoperatively is essential. Reconstructing and splicing the earlobe with autologous rib cartilage in cases where the residual ear cannot be utilized compensate for the defect that the soft tissue cannot provide the earlobe flap. This is an effective surgical method for the ear reconstruction in such patients.","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Classification of Microtia With Unusable Remnant Ear and Techniques in the First Stage of Two-Stage Auricular Reconstruction.\",\"authors\":\"Bei He,Bingqing Wang,Qingguo Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/sap.0000000000004103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nThe remnant ear is a very important material in auricular reconstruction surgery; its dimension, position, and shape determine how it is used. However, the local conditions of microtia patients are complex and variable. Situations may be encountered where a series of abnormal remnant ears cannot be utilized in clinical practice. Currently, there are no literature that elaborates on this type of microtia and provides systematic treatment methods. The purpose of this article is to systematically classify them and optimize the two-stage method auricular reconstruction, to provide an effective surgical method for these patients.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nBased on the size, shape, and relative position of the residual ears, the unusable remnant ears were classified into three types: tiny size, abnormal shape, and relative position anomaly (over 1-cm higher than the contralateral earlobe). Fifty-three microtia patients with unusable remnant ear (54 ears) who underwent two-stage auricular reconstruction from August 2020 to August 2023 were reviewed. All patients had experienced earlobe reconstruction by using autologous rib cartilage during the first stage of surgery. Aesthetic assessments were evaluated from the naturalness of the earlobe reconstructed with autologous rib cartilage and the connection with the overall framework. The data on any complications that occurred during the follow-up period and patient satisfaction were collected.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nAmong all patients, 31 had tiny size, 14 had abnormal shape, and 8 had excessively high positions. Patients were followed up for an average period of 9.2 months (6 to 12 months). No complex complications such as infection, skin necrosis, or cartilage exposure occurred. Fifty patients (94.3%) achieved excellent or good aesthetic outcomes. Fifty-one patients (96.2%) were satisfied with the reconstruction outcomes.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nAn accurate assessment of the residual ear preoperatively is essential. Reconstructing and splicing the earlobe with autologous rib cartilage in cases where the residual ear cannot be utilized compensate for the defect that the soft tissue cannot provide the earlobe flap. This is an effective surgical method for the ear reconstruction in such patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Plastic Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Plastic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/sap.0000000000004103\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/sap.0000000000004103","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景残耳是耳廓重建手术中非常重要的材料,其尺寸、位置和形状决定了如何使用它。然而,小耳症患者的局部情况复杂多变。在临床实践中,可能会遇到无法使用一系列异常残耳的情况。目前,还没有文献对这类小耳症进行详细阐述,并提供系统的治疗方法。方法根据残耳的大小、形状和相对位置,将无法使用的残耳分为三种类型:极小、形状异常和相对位置异常(比对侧耳垂高出 1 厘米以上)。研究人员回顾了在 2020 年 8 月至 2023 年 8 月期间接受两阶段耳廓重建手术的 53 名小耳症患者(54 耳)。所有患者在第一阶段手术中都使用了自体肋软骨进行耳垂重建。美学评估从使用自体肋软骨重建的耳垂的自然程度以及与整体框架的连接情况进行评估。结果在所有患者中,31 例患者的耳垂过小,14 例患者的耳垂形状异常,8 例患者的耳垂位置过高。患者的随访时间平均为 9.2 个月(6 至 12 个月)。没有出现感染、皮肤坏死或软骨外露等复杂并发症。50名患者(94.3%)获得了极佳或良好的美学效果。结论术前对残耳进行准确评估至关重要。在无法利用残耳的情况下,用自体肋软骨重建和拼接耳垂,可以弥补软组织无法提供耳垂瓣的缺陷。对于此类患者,这是一种有效的耳部重建手术方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Classification of Microtia With Unusable Remnant Ear and Techniques in the First Stage of Two-Stage Auricular Reconstruction.
BACKGROUND The remnant ear is a very important material in auricular reconstruction surgery; its dimension, position, and shape determine how it is used. However, the local conditions of microtia patients are complex and variable. Situations may be encountered where a series of abnormal remnant ears cannot be utilized in clinical practice. Currently, there are no literature that elaborates on this type of microtia and provides systematic treatment methods. The purpose of this article is to systematically classify them and optimize the two-stage method auricular reconstruction, to provide an effective surgical method for these patients. METHODS Based on the size, shape, and relative position of the residual ears, the unusable remnant ears were classified into three types: tiny size, abnormal shape, and relative position anomaly (over 1-cm higher than the contralateral earlobe). Fifty-three microtia patients with unusable remnant ear (54 ears) who underwent two-stage auricular reconstruction from August 2020 to August 2023 were reviewed. All patients had experienced earlobe reconstruction by using autologous rib cartilage during the first stage of surgery. Aesthetic assessments were evaluated from the naturalness of the earlobe reconstructed with autologous rib cartilage and the connection with the overall framework. The data on any complications that occurred during the follow-up period and patient satisfaction were collected. RESULTS Among all patients, 31 had tiny size, 14 had abnormal shape, and 8 had excessively high positions. Patients were followed up for an average period of 9.2 months (6 to 12 months). No complex complications such as infection, skin necrosis, or cartilage exposure occurred. Fifty patients (94.3%) achieved excellent or good aesthetic outcomes. Fifty-one patients (96.2%) were satisfied with the reconstruction outcomes. CONCLUSIONS An accurate assessment of the residual ear preoperatively is essential. Reconstructing and splicing the earlobe with autologous rib cartilage in cases where the residual ear cannot be utilized compensate for the defect that the soft tissue cannot provide the earlobe flap. This is an effective surgical method for the ear reconstruction in such patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
584
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The only independent journal devoted to general plastic and reconstructive surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery serves as a forum for current scientific and clinical advances in the field and a sounding board for ideas and perspectives on its future. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, brief communications, case reports, and notes in all areas of interest to the practicing plastic surgeon. There are also historical and current reviews, descriptions of surgical technique, and lively editorials and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信