评估 YiDiXie™-SS、YiDiXie™-HS 和 YiDiXie™-D 对卵巢癌的诊断价值

Pengwu Zhang, Chen Sun, Zhenjian Ge, Wenkang Chen, Yingqi Li, Shengjie Lin, Wuping Wang, Siwei Chen, Yutong Wu, Huimei Zhou, Xutai Li, Wei Li, Yongqing Lai
{"title":"评估 YiDiXie™-SS、YiDiXie™-HS 和 YiDiXie™-D 对卵巢癌的诊断价值","authors":"Pengwu Zhang, Chen Sun, Zhenjian Ge, Wenkang Chen, Yingqi Li, Shengjie Lin, Wuping Wang, Siwei Chen, Yutong Wu, Huimei Zhou, Xutai Li, Wei Li, Yongqing Lai","doi":"10.1101/2024.09.15.24313714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Ovarian cancer is a serious risk to human health and causes a heavy economic burden. Ultrasound is widely used in the diagnosis of ovarian tumors. However, false-positive ultrasound results can lead to false diagnosis, and patients will have to bear unnecessary mental pain, expensive surgery and examination costs, surgical trauma, organ removal, loss of function, and even serious complications in the perioperative period, and other adverse consequences. False-negative ultrasound results lead to delayed treatment, and patients will have to bear the consequences of poor prognosis, high treatment costs, poor quality of life, and poor survival. There is an urgent need to find convenient, cost-effective and non-invasive diagnostic methods to reduce the false-negative and false-positive rates of ovarian ultrasound. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of YiDiXie™-SS, YiDiXie™-HS and YiDiXie™-D in Ovarian cancer.\nPatients and methods: The study finally included 79 study subjects (malignant group, n=12; benign group, n=67). Remaining serum samples from the subjects were collected and tested by applying YiDiXie™ all-cancer detection kit to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of YiDiXie™-SS, YiDiXie™-HS and YiDiXie™-D, respectively.\nResults: YiDiXie™-SS had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 75.8% - 100%) and a specificity of 61.2% (95% CI: 49.2% - 72.0%). YiDiXie™-HS had a sensitivity of 91.7% (95% CI: 64.6% - 99.6%) and a specificity of 86.6% (95% CI: 76.4% - 92.8%). The sensitivity of YiDiXie™-D was 33.3% (95% CI: 13.8% - 60.0%) and its specificity was 97.0% (95% CI: 89.8% - 99.5%). The sensitivity of YiDiXie™-SS in ultrasound-positive patients was 100% (95% CI: 67.6% - 100%) and its specificity was 61.9% (95% CI: 40.9% - 79.2%). This represents a 61.9% (95% CI: 40.9% - 79.2%) reduction in the rate of false-positive ovarian ultrasound with the application of YiDiXie™-SS with essentially no increase in malignant tumor under-diagnosis. The sensitivity of YiDiXie™-HS in ultrasound-negative patients was 75.0% (95% CI: 30.1% - 98.7%) and its specificity was 84.8% (95% CI: 71.8% - 92.4%). This means that the application of YiDiXie™-HS reduces the false negative rate of ultrasound by 75.0% (95% CI: 30.1% - 98.7%). YiDiXie™-D had a sensitivity of 25.0% (95% CI: 4.4% - 59.1%) in ultrasound-positive patients and its specificity was 95.2% (95% CI: 77.3% - 99.8%). This represents a 95.2% (95% CI: 77.3% - 99.8%) reduction in the rate of ultrasound false positives with YiDiXie™-SS. Conclusion: YiDiXie™-SS markedly reduced the false-positive rate of ovarian ultrasound with essentially no increase in delayed treatment of malignant tumors. YiDiXie™-HS substantially reduced the false-negative rate of ovarian ultrasound. YiDiXie™-D substantially reduced the false-positive rate of ovarian ultrasound. The YiDiXie™ test has an excellent diagnostic value in ovarian cancer, and promises to solve the problems of \"high false-positive rate of ultrasound\" and \"high false-negative rate of ultrasound\" in ovarian tumors. Clinical trial number: ChiCTR2200066840.\nKey words: Ovarian cancer, Ovary ultrasound, False-positive, False-negative, YiDiXie™-SS, YiDiXie™-HS, YiDiXie™-D","PeriodicalId":501437,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Oncology","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the diagnostic value of YiDiXie™-SS, YiDiXie™-HS, and YiDiXie™-D in Ovarian cancer\",\"authors\":\"Pengwu Zhang, Chen Sun, Zhenjian Ge, Wenkang Chen, Yingqi Li, Shengjie Lin, Wuping Wang, Siwei Chen, Yutong Wu, Huimei Zhou, Xutai Li, Wei Li, Yongqing Lai\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.09.15.24313714\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Ovarian cancer is a serious risk to human health and causes a heavy economic burden. Ultrasound is widely used in the diagnosis of ovarian tumors. However, false-positive ultrasound results can lead to false diagnosis, and patients will have to bear unnecessary mental pain, expensive surgery and examination costs, surgical trauma, organ removal, loss of function, and even serious complications in the perioperative period, and other adverse consequences. False-negative ultrasound results lead to delayed treatment, and patients will have to bear the consequences of poor prognosis, high treatment costs, poor quality of life, and poor survival. There is an urgent need to find convenient, cost-effective and non-invasive diagnostic methods to reduce the false-negative and false-positive rates of ovarian ultrasound. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of YiDiXie™-SS, YiDiXie™-HS and YiDiXie™-D in Ovarian cancer.\\nPatients and methods: The study finally included 79 study subjects (malignant group, n=12; benign group, n=67). Remaining serum samples from the subjects were collected and tested by applying YiDiXie™ all-cancer detection kit to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of YiDiXie™-SS, YiDiXie™-HS and YiDiXie™-D, respectively.\\nResults: YiDiXie™-SS had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 75.8% - 100%) and a specificity of 61.2% (95% CI: 49.2% - 72.0%). YiDiXie™-HS had a sensitivity of 91.7% (95% CI: 64.6% - 99.6%) and a specificity of 86.6% (95% CI: 76.4% - 92.8%). The sensitivity of YiDiXie™-D was 33.3% (95% CI: 13.8% - 60.0%) and its specificity was 97.0% (95% CI: 89.8% - 99.5%). The sensitivity of YiDiXie™-SS in ultrasound-positive patients was 100% (95% CI: 67.6% - 100%) and its specificity was 61.9% (95% CI: 40.9% - 79.2%). This represents a 61.9% (95% CI: 40.9% - 79.2%) reduction in the rate of false-positive ovarian ultrasound with the application of YiDiXie™-SS with essentially no increase in malignant tumor under-diagnosis. The sensitivity of YiDiXie™-HS in ultrasound-negative patients was 75.0% (95% CI: 30.1% - 98.7%) and its specificity was 84.8% (95% CI: 71.8% - 92.4%). This means that the application of YiDiXie™-HS reduces the false negative rate of ultrasound by 75.0% (95% CI: 30.1% - 98.7%). YiDiXie™-D had a sensitivity of 25.0% (95% CI: 4.4% - 59.1%) in ultrasound-positive patients and its specificity was 95.2% (95% CI: 77.3% - 99.8%). This represents a 95.2% (95% CI: 77.3% - 99.8%) reduction in the rate of ultrasound false positives with YiDiXie™-SS. Conclusion: YiDiXie™-SS markedly reduced the false-positive rate of ovarian ultrasound with essentially no increase in delayed treatment of malignant tumors. YiDiXie™-HS substantially reduced the false-negative rate of ovarian ultrasound. YiDiXie™-D substantially reduced the false-positive rate of ovarian ultrasound. The YiDiXie™ test has an excellent diagnostic value in ovarian cancer, and promises to solve the problems of \\\"high false-positive rate of ultrasound\\\" and \\\"high false-negative rate of ultrasound\\\" in ovarian tumors. Clinical trial number: ChiCTR2200066840.\\nKey words: Ovarian cancer, Ovary ultrasound, False-positive, False-negative, YiDiXie™-SS, YiDiXie™-HS, YiDiXie™-D\",\"PeriodicalId\":501437,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Oncology\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.15.24313714\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.15.24313714","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:卵巢癌严重危害人类健康,并造成沉重的经济负担。超声波被广泛应用于卵巢肿瘤的诊断。然而,超声假阳性结果会导致误诊,患者将不得不承受不必要的精神痛苦、昂贵的手术和检查费用、手术创伤、器官切除、功能丧失,甚至围手术期的严重并发症等不良后果。超声假阴性结果导致治疗延误,患者将不得不承担预后差、治疗费用高、生活质量差、生存率低等后果。因此,迫切需要找到方便、经济、无创的诊断方法来降低卵巢超声的假阴性和假阳性率。本研究旨在评估 YiDiXie™-SS、YiDiXie™-HS 和 YiDiXie™-D 对卵巢癌的诊断价值:研究最终包括 79 名研究对象(恶性组,12 人;良性组,67 人)。收集受试者的剩余血清样本,应用 YiDiXie™ 全癌检测试剂盒进行检测,分别评估 YiDiXie™-SS, YiDiXie™-HS 和 YiDiXie™-D 的灵敏度和特异性:YiDiXie™-SS 的灵敏度为 100%(95% CI:75.8% - 100%),特异度为 61.2%(95% CI:49.2% - 72.0%)。YiDiXie™-HS 的灵敏度为 91.7%(95% CI:64.6% - 99.6%),特异性为 86.6%(95% CI:76.4% - 92.8%)。YiDiXie™-D 的敏感性为 33.3%(95% CI:13.8% - 60.0%),特异性为 97.0%(95% CI:89.8% - 99.5%)。YiDiXie™-SS对超声阳性患者的敏感性为100%(95% CI:67.6% - 100%),特异性为61.9%(95% CI:40.9% - 79.2%)。这表明应用 YiDiXie™-SS 后,卵巢超声假阳性率降低了 61.9%(95% CI:40.9% - 79.2%),而恶性肿瘤漏诊率基本没有增加。YiDiXie™-HS 对超声阴性患者的敏感性为 75.0%(95% CI:30.1% - 98.7%),特异性为 84.8%(95% CI:71.8% - 92.4%)。这意味着应用 YiDiXie™-HS 可将超声检查的假阴性率降低 75.0% (95% CI: 30.1% - 98.7%)。YiDiXie™-D 对超声波阳性患者的灵敏度为 25.0%(95% CI:4.4% - 59.1%),特异性为 95.2%(95% CI:77.3% - 99.8%)。这表明使用 YiDiXie™-SS 可将超声假阳性率降低 95.2% (95% CI: 77.3% - 99.8%)。结论YiDiXie™-SS明显降低了卵巢超声的假阳性率,而且基本上没有增加恶性肿瘤的延迟治疗。YiDiXie™-HS 大幅降低了卵巢超声的假阴性率。YiDiXie™-D 大幅降低了卵巢超声的假阳性率。YiDiXie™检测方法对卵巢癌有很好的诊断价值,有望解决卵巢肿瘤 "超声假阳性率高 "和 "超声假阴性率高 "的问题。临床试验编号ChiCTR2200066840.Key words:卵巢癌 卵巢超声 假阳性 假阴性 YiDiXie™-SS, YiDiXie™-HS, YiDiXie™-D
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the diagnostic value of YiDiXie™-SS, YiDiXie™-HS, and YiDiXie™-D in Ovarian cancer
Background: Ovarian cancer is a serious risk to human health and causes a heavy economic burden. Ultrasound is widely used in the diagnosis of ovarian tumors. However, false-positive ultrasound results can lead to false diagnosis, and patients will have to bear unnecessary mental pain, expensive surgery and examination costs, surgical trauma, organ removal, loss of function, and even serious complications in the perioperative period, and other adverse consequences. False-negative ultrasound results lead to delayed treatment, and patients will have to bear the consequences of poor prognosis, high treatment costs, poor quality of life, and poor survival. There is an urgent need to find convenient, cost-effective and non-invasive diagnostic methods to reduce the false-negative and false-positive rates of ovarian ultrasound. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of YiDiXie™-SS, YiDiXie™-HS and YiDiXie™-D in Ovarian cancer. Patients and methods: The study finally included 79 study subjects (malignant group, n=12; benign group, n=67). Remaining serum samples from the subjects were collected and tested by applying YiDiXie™ all-cancer detection kit to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of YiDiXie™-SS, YiDiXie™-HS and YiDiXie™-D, respectively. Results: YiDiXie™-SS had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 75.8% - 100%) and a specificity of 61.2% (95% CI: 49.2% - 72.0%). YiDiXie™-HS had a sensitivity of 91.7% (95% CI: 64.6% - 99.6%) and a specificity of 86.6% (95% CI: 76.4% - 92.8%). The sensitivity of YiDiXie™-D was 33.3% (95% CI: 13.8% - 60.0%) and its specificity was 97.0% (95% CI: 89.8% - 99.5%). The sensitivity of YiDiXie™-SS in ultrasound-positive patients was 100% (95% CI: 67.6% - 100%) and its specificity was 61.9% (95% CI: 40.9% - 79.2%). This represents a 61.9% (95% CI: 40.9% - 79.2%) reduction in the rate of false-positive ovarian ultrasound with the application of YiDiXie™-SS with essentially no increase in malignant tumor under-diagnosis. The sensitivity of YiDiXie™-HS in ultrasound-negative patients was 75.0% (95% CI: 30.1% - 98.7%) and its specificity was 84.8% (95% CI: 71.8% - 92.4%). This means that the application of YiDiXie™-HS reduces the false negative rate of ultrasound by 75.0% (95% CI: 30.1% - 98.7%). YiDiXie™-D had a sensitivity of 25.0% (95% CI: 4.4% - 59.1%) in ultrasound-positive patients and its specificity was 95.2% (95% CI: 77.3% - 99.8%). This represents a 95.2% (95% CI: 77.3% - 99.8%) reduction in the rate of ultrasound false positives with YiDiXie™-SS. Conclusion: YiDiXie™-SS markedly reduced the false-positive rate of ovarian ultrasound with essentially no increase in delayed treatment of malignant tumors. YiDiXie™-HS substantially reduced the false-negative rate of ovarian ultrasound. YiDiXie™-D substantially reduced the false-positive rate of ovarian ultrasound. The YiDiXie™ test has an excellent diagnostic value in ovarian cancer, and promises to solve the problems of "high false-positive rate of ultrasound" and "high false-negative rate of ultrasound" in ovarian tumors. Clinical trial number: ChiCTR2200066840. Key words: Ovarian cancer, Ovary ultrasound, False-positive, False-negative, YiDiXie™-SS, YiDiXie™-HS, YiDiXie™-D
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信