评估 YiDiXie™-SS 和 YiDiXie™-HS 在食管癌中的诊断价值

Xutai Li, Zhenjian Ge, Peng Liao, Chen Sun, Wenkang Chen, Yingqi Li, Shengjie Lin, Pengwu Zhang, Wuping Wang, Siwei Chen, Yutong Wu, Huimei Zhou, Wei Li, Jing Du, Fangting Zhang, Yongqing Lai
{"title":"评估 YiDiXie™-SS 和 YiDiXie™-HS 在食管癌中的诊断价值","authors":"Xutai Li, Zhenjian Ge, Peng Liao, Chen Sun, Wenkang Chen, Yingqi Li, Shengjie Lin, Pengwu Zhang, Wuping Wang, Siwei Chen, Yutong Wu, Huimei Zhou, Wei Li, Jing Du, Fangting Zhang, Yongqing Lai","doi":"10.1101/2024.09.15.24313696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Esophageal cancer is a serious threat to human health and causes a heavy economic burden. upper gastrointestinal imaging(UGI imaging), enhanced CT, Fecal occult blood Tumor markers such as test(FOBT) and CEA, CA125 and CA19-9 are widely used in the screening or preliminary diagnosis of esophageal cancer. However, false positive results such as UGI imaging will bring unnecessary mental pain, expensive examination costs, examination injuries and other adverse consequences. However, false negative results such as UGI imaging lead to delayed treatment, and patients will have to bear the adverse consequences of poor prognosis, high treatment costs, poor quality of life, and short survival time. It is urgent to find a convenient, economical and non-invasive diagnostic method to reduce the false negative rate and false positive rate of UGI imaging. The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of YiDiXie™-SS and YiDiXie™-HS in esophageal cancer.\nPatients and methods: This study included 164 subjects (malignant group, n=105; Benign group, n=59 cases). The remaining serum samples of the subjects were collected and the sensitivity and specificity of the YiDiXie™-SS and YiDiXie™-HS were evaluated using the YiDiXie™all-cancer detection kit.\nResults: The sensitivity of YiDiXie™-SS was 99.0% (95% CI: 94.8% - 100%) and its specificity was 62.7% (95% CI: 50.0% - 73.9%). The sensitivity of YiDiXie™-HS was 92.3% (95% CI: 85.7% - 96.1%) and its specificity was 86.4% (95% CI: 75.5% - 93.0%). The sensitivity of YiDiXie™-SS in UGI imaging, enhanced CT, FOBT, CEA, CA125 and CA19-9 positive patients was 96.6% (95% CI: 82.8-99.8%) and 98.7% (95% CI: 93.1% - 99.9%), 100% (95% CI: 17.8% 100%), 100% (95% CI: 81.6% 100%), 100% (95% CI: 61.0% 100%), 100% (95%CI: 56.6%-100%); The specific degrees were 60.0% (95% CI: 23.1% 92.9%), 75.0% (95% CI: 30.1% 98.7%), 100% (95% CI: 5.1% 100%), 100% (95% CI: 43.9% - 100%), 100% (95% CI: 5.1% 100%), 50.0% (95% CI: 2.6% 97.4%). This means that the application of YiDiXie™-SS, without basically increasing the missed diagnosis of malignant tumors, reduced the false positive range of UGI imaging, enhanced CT, FOBT, CEA, CA125 and CA19-9 by 60.0% (95% CI: 23.1% - 92.9%), 75.0% (95% CI: 30.1% 98.7%), 100% (95% CI: 5.1% 100%), 100% (95% CI: 43.9% 100%), 100% (95% CI: 5.1% - 100%), 50.0% (95% CI: 2.6% 97.4%).\tThe sensitivity of YiDiXie™-HS in UGI imaging, enhanced CT, FOBT, CEA, CA125 and CA19-9 negative patients was 88.9% (95% CI: 56.5% - 99.4%), 92.6% (95% CI: 84.8% - 96.6%), 96.9% (95% CI: 84.3% - 99.8%), 92.6% (95% CI: 84.8% - 96.6%), 92.0% (95% CI: 84.5% - 96.1%), 91.3% (95% CI: 83.8% - 95.5%), respectively; The specific degrees were 60.0% (95% CI: 23.1% 92.9%), 87.3% (95% CI: 76.0% 93.7%), 80.0% (95% CI: 37.6% 99.0%), 89.1% (95% CI: 78.2% - 94.9%), 79.3% (95% CI: 61.6% 90.2%), 87.0% (95% CI: 75.6% 93.6%). This means that YiDiXie™-HS reduced false negatives for UGI imaging, enhanced CT, FOBT, CEA, CA125 and CA19-9 by 88.9% (95% CI: 56.5% - 99.4%), 92.6% (95% CI: 84.8% 96.6%), 96.9% (95% CI: 84.3% 99.8%), 92.6% (95% CI: 84.8% 96.6%), 92.0% (95% CI: 84.5% - 96.1%), 91.3% (95% CI: 83.8% 95.5%). Conclusion: YiDiXie™-SS significantly reduced the false-positive rate of UGI imaging, enhanced CT, FOBT, CEA, CA125 and CA19-9 without substantially increasing the delayed treatment of malignant tumors. YiDiXie™-HS significantly reduced false negative rates for UGI imaging, enhanced CT, FOBT, CEA, CA125 and CA19-9. YiDiXie™-SS and YiDiXie™-HS have important diagnostic value in esophageal cancer, and are expected to solve the two problems of \"too high false positive rate such as UGI imaging\" and \"too high false negative rate such as UGI imaging\" in esophageal cancer. Clinical trial number: ChiCTR2200066840.\nKey words: Esophageal cancer, UGI imaging, enhanced CT, Fecal occult blood test, CEA, CA125, CA15-3, CA19-9, False-positive, False-negative, YiDiXie™-SS, YiDiXie™-HS","PeriodicalId":501437,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Oncology","volume":"65 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the diagnostic value of YiDiXie™-SS and YiDiXie™-HS in esophageal cancer\",\"authors\":\"Xutai Li, Zhenjian Ge, Peng Liao, Chen Sun, Wenkang Chen, Yingqi Li, Shengjie Lin, Pengwu Zhang, Wuping Wang, Siwei Chen, Yutong Wu, Huimei Zhou, Wei Li, Jing Du, Fangting Zhang, Yongqing Lai\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.09.15.24313696\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Esophageal cancer is a serious threat to human health and causes a heavy economic burden. upper gastrointestinal imaging(UGI imaging), enhanced CT, Fecal occult blood Tumor markers such as test(FOBT) and CEA, CA125 and CA19-9 are widely used in the screening or preliminary diagnosis of esophageal cancer. However, false positive results such as UGI imaging will bring unnecessary mental pain, expensive examination costs, examination injuries and other adverse consequences. However, false negative results such as UGI imaging lead to delayed treatment, and patients will have to bear the adverse consequences of poor prognosis, high treatment costs, poor quality of life, and short survival time. It is urgent to find a convenient, economical and non-invasive diagnostic method to reduce the false negative rate and false positive rate of UGI imaging. The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of YiDiXie™-SS and YiDiXie™-HS in esophageal cancer.\\nPatients and methods: This study included 164 subjects (malignant group, n=105; Benign group, n=59 cases). The remaining serum samples of the subjects were collected and the sensitivity and specificity of the YiDiXie™-SS and YiDiXie™-HS were evaluated using the YiDiXie™all-cancer detection kit.\\nResults: The sensitivity of YiDiXie™-SS was 99.0% (95% CI: 94.8% - 100%) and its specificity was 62.7% (95% CI: 50.0% - 73.9%). The sensitivity of YiDiXie™-HS was 92.3% (95% CI: 85.7% - 96.1%) and its specificity was 86.4% (95% CI: 75.5% - 93.0%). The sensitivity of YiDiXie™-SS in UGI imaging, enhanced CT, FOBT, CEA, CA125 and CA19-9 positive patients was 96.6% (95% CI: 82.8-99.8%) and 98.7% (95% CI: 93.1% - 99.9%), 100% (95% CI: 17.8% 100%), 100% (95% CI: 81.6% 100%), 100% (95% CI: 61.0% 100%), 100% (95%CI: 56.6%-100%); The specific degrees were 60.0% (95% CI: 23.1% 92.9%), 75.0% (95% CI: 30.1% 98.7%), 100% (95% CI: 5.1% 100%), 100% (95% CI: 43.9% - 100%), 100% (95% CI: 5.1% 100%), 50.0% (95% CI: 2.6% 97.4%). This means that the application of YiDiXie™-SS, without basically increasing the missed diagnosis of malignant tumors, reduced the false positive range of UGI imaging, enhanced CT, FOBT, CEA, CA125 and CA19-9 by 60.0% (95% CI: 23.1% - 92.9%), 75.0% (95% CI: 30.1% 98.7%), 100% (95% CI: 5.1% 100%), 100% (95% CI: 43.9% 100%), 100% (95% CI: 5.1% - 100%), 50.0% (95% CI: 2.6% 97.4%).\\tThe sensitivity of YiDiXie™-HS in UGI imaging, enhanced CT, FOBT, CEA, CA125 and CA19-9 negative patients was 88.9% (95% CI: 56.5% - 99.4%), 92.6% (95% CI: 84.8% - 96.6%), 96.9% (95% CI: 84.3% - 99.8%), 92.6% (95% CI: 84.8% - 96.6%), 92.0% (95% CI: 84.5% - 96.1%), 91.3% (95% CI: 83.8% - 95.5%), respectively; The specific degrees were 60.0% (95% CI: 23.1% 92.9%), 87.3% (95% CI: 76.0% 93.7%), 80.0% (95% CI: 37.6% 99.0%), 89.1% (95% CI: 78.2% - 94.9%), 79.3% (95% CI: 61.6% 90.2%), 87.0% (95% CI: 75.6% 93.6%). This means that YiDiXie™-HS reduced false negatives for UGI imaging, enhanced CT, FOBT, CEA, CA125 and CA19-9 by 88.9% (95% CI: 56.5% - 99.4%), 92.6% (95% CI: 84.8% 96.6%), 96.9% (95% CI: 84.3% 99.8%), 92.6% (95% CI: 84.8% 96.6%), 92.0% (95% CI: 84.5% - 96.1%), 91.3% (95% CI: 83.8% 95.5%). Conclusion: YiDiXie™-SS significantly reduced the false-positive rate of UGI imaging, enhanced CT, FOBT, CEA, CA125 and CA19-9 without substantially increasing the delayed treatment of malignant tumors. YiDiXie™-HS significantly reduced false negative rates for UGI imaging, enhanced CT, FOBT, CEA, CA125 and CA19-9. YiDiXie™-SS and YiDiXie™-HS have important diagnostic value in esophageal cancer, and are expected to solve the two problems of \\\"too high false positive rate such as UGI imaging\\\" and \\\"too high false negative rate such as UGI imaging\\\" in esophageal cancer. Clinical trial number: ChiCTR2200066840.\\nKey words: Esophageal cancer, UGI imaging, enhanced CT, Fecal occult blood test, CEA, CA125, CA15-3, CA19-9, False-positive, False-negative, YiDiXie™-SS, YiDiXie™-HS\",\"PeriodicalId\":501437,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Oncology\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.15.24313696\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.15.24313696","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:上消化道造影(UGI)、增强 CT、粪便隐血试验(FOBT)、CEA、CA125 和 CA19-9 等肿瘤标志物被广泛应用于食管癌的筛查或初步诊断。但 UGI 造影等假阳性结果会带来不必要的精神痛苦、昂贵的检查费用、检查损伤等不良后果。然而,UGI 造影等假阴性结果导致治疗延误,患者将不得不承担预后差、治疗费用高、生活质量差、生存时间短等不良后果。因此,寻找一种便捷、经济、无创的诊断方法来降低 UGI 造影的假阴性率和假阳性率迫在眉睫。本研究旨在评估 YiDiXie™-SS 和 YiDiXie™-HS 对食管癌的诊断价值:本研究包括164名受试者(恶性组,n=105;良性组,n=59例)。收集受试者的剩余血清样本,使用 YiDiXie™ 全癌检测试剂盒评估 YiDiXie™-SS 和 YiDiXie™-HS 的灵敏度和特异性:YiDiXie™-SS 的灵敏度为 99.0%(95% CI:94.8% - 100%),特异度为 62.7%(95% CI:50.0% - 73.9%)。YiDiXie™-HS 的灵敏度为 92.3% (95% CI: 85.7% - 96.1%),特异度为 86.4% (95% CI: 75.5% - 93.0%)。YiDiXie™-SS 对 UGI 成像、增强 CT、FOBT、CEA、CA125 和 CA19-9 阳性患者的敏感性分别为 96.6% (95% CI: 82.8-99.8%) 和 98.7% (95% CI: 93.1% - 99.9%)、100% (95% CI: 17.8% 100%) 、100% (95% CI: 81.6% 100%) 、100% (95% CI: 61.0%100%)、100%(95%CI:56.6%-100%);具体程度分别为60.0%(95%CI:23.1%92.9%)、75.0%(95%CI:30.1%98.7%)、100%(95%CI:5.1%100%)、100%(95%CI:43.9%-100%)、100%(95%CI:5.1%100%)、50.0%(95%CI:2.6%97.4%)。这说明应用 YiDiXie™-SS 在基本不增加恶性肿瘤漏诊的情况下,降低了 UGI 成像、增强 CT、FOBT、CEA、CA125 和 CA19-9 的假阳性范围,分别降低了 60.0% (95% CI: 23.1% - 92.9%)、75.YiDiXie™-HS 对 UGI 成像、增强 CT、FOBT、CEA、CA125 和 CA19-9 阴性患者的敏感性分别为 88.9%(95% ci:56.5% - 99.4%)、92.6%(95% ci:84.8% - 96.6%)、96.9%(95% ci:84.3% - 99.8%)、92.6%(95% ci:84.8% - 96.6%)、92.0%(95% ci:84.5% - 96.1%)、91.3%(95% ci:83.8% - 95.5%);具体程度分别为60.0%(95% CI:23.1% 92.9%)、87.3%(95% CI:76.0% 93.7%)、80.0%(95% CI:37.6% 99.0%)、89.1%(95% CI:78.2% - 94.9%)、79.3%(95% CI:61.6% 90.2%)、87.0%(95% CI:75.6% 93.6%)。这意味着,YiDiXie™-HS 可将 UGI 成像、增强 CT、FOBT、CEA、CA125 和 CA19-9 的假阴性率分别降低 88.9% (95% CI: 56.5% - 99.4%)、92.6% (95% CI: 84.8% 96.6%)、96.9% (95% CI: 84.3% 99.8%)、92.6% (95% CI: 84.8% 96.6%)、92.0% (95% CI: 84.5% - 96.1%)、91.3% (95% CI: 83.8% 95.5%)。结论YiDiXie™-SS 能显著降低 UGI 成像、增强 CT、FOBT、CEA、CA125 和 CA19-9 的假阳性率,且不会大幅增加恶性肿瘤的延迟治疗率。YiDiXie™-HS 显著降低了 UGI 成像、增强 CT、FOBT、CEA、CA125 和 CA19-9 的假阴性率。YiDiXie™-SS和YiDiXie™-HS对食管癌具有重要的诊断价值,有望解决食管癌 "UGI造影假阳性率过高 "和 "UGI造影假阴性率过高 "两大难题。临床试验编号ChiCTR2200066840.Key words:食管癌 UGI 成像 增强 CT 大便潜血试验 CEA, CA125, CA15-3, CA19-9 假阳性 假阴性 易迪协™-SS, 易迪协™-HS
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the diagnostic value of YiDiXie™-SS and YiDiXie™-HS in esophageal cancer
Background: Esophageal cancer is a serious threat to human health and causes a heavy economic burden. upper gastrointestinal imaging(UGI imaging), enhanced CT, Fecal occult blood Tumor markers such as test(FOBT) and CEA, CA125 and CA19-9 are widely used in the screening or preliminary diagnosis of esophageal cancer. However, false positive results such as UGI imaging will bring unnecessary mental pain, expensive examination costs, examination injuries and other adverse consequences. However, false negative results such as UGI imaging lead to delayed treatment, and patients will have to bear the adverse consequences of poor prognosis, high treatment costs, poor quality of life, and short survival time. It is urgent to find a convenient, economical and non-invasive diagnostic method to reduce the false negative rate and false positive rate of UGI imaging. The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of YiDiXie™-SS and YiDiXie™-HS in esophageal cancer. Patients and methods: This study included 164 subjects (malignant group, n=105; Benign group, n=59 cases). The remaining serum samples of the subjects were collected and the sensitivity and specificity of the YiDiXie™-SS and YiDiXie™-HS were evaluated using the YiDiXie™all-cancer detection kit. Results: The sensitivity of YiDiXie™-SS was 99.0% (95% CI: 94.8% - 100%) and its specificity was 62.7% (95% CI: 50.0% - 73.9%). The sensitivity of YiDiXie™-HS was 92.3% (95% CI: 85.7% - 96.1%) and its specificity was 86.4% (95% CI: 75.5% - 93.0%). The sensitivity of YiDiXie™-SS in UGI imaging, enhanced CT, FOBT, CEA, CA125 and CA19-9 positive patients was 96.6% (95% CI: 82.8-99.8%) and 98.7% (95% CI: 93.1% - 99.9%), 100% (95% CI: 17.8% 100%), 100% (95% CI: 81.6% 100%), 100% (95% CI: 61.0% 100%), 100% (95%CI: 56.6%-100%); The specific degrees were 60.0% (95% CI: 23.1% 92.9%), 75.0% (95% CI: 30.1% 98.7%), 100% (95% CI: 5.1% 100%), 100% (95% CI: 43.9% - 100%), 100% (95% CI: 5.1% 100%), 50.0% (95% CI: 2.6% 97.4%). This means that the application of YiDiXie™-SS, without basically increasing the missed diagnosis of malignant tumors, reduced the false positive range of UGI imaging, enhanced CT, FOBT, CEA, CA125 and CA19-9 by 60.0% (95% CI: 23.1% - 92.9%), 75.0% (95% CI: 30.1% 98.7%), 100% (95% CI: 5.1% 100%), 100% (95% CI: 43.9% 100%), 100% (95% CI: 5.1% - 100%), 50.0% (95% CI: 2.6% 97.4%). The sensitivity of YiDiXie™-HS in UGI imaging, enhanced CT, FOBT, CEA, CA125 and CA19-9 negative patients was 88.9% (95% CI: 56.5% - 99.4%), 92.6% (95% CI: 84.8% - 96.6%), 96.9% (95% CI: 84.3% - 99.8%), 92.6% (95% CI: 84.8% - 96.6%), 92.0% (95% CI: 84.5% - 96.1%), 91.3% (95% CI: 83.8% - 95.5%), respectively; The specific degrees were 60.0% (95% CI: 23.1% 92.9%), 87.3% (95% CI: 76.0% 93.7%), 80.0% (95% CI: 37.6% 99.0%), 89.1% (95% CI: 78.2% - 94.9%), 79.3% (95% CI: 61.6% 90.2%), 87.0% (95% CI: 75.6% 93.6%). This means that YiDiXie™-HS reduced false negatives for UGI imaging, enhanced CT, FOBT, CEA, CA125 and CA19-9 by 88.9% (95% CI: 56.5% - 99.4%), 92.6% (95% CI: 84.8% 96.6%), 96.9% (95% CI: 84.3% 99.8%), 92.6% (95% CI: 84.8% 96.6%), 92.0% (95% CI: 84.5% - 96.1%), 91.3% (95% CI: 83.8% 95.5%). Conclusion: YiDiXie™-SS significantly reduced the false-positive rate of UGI imaging, enhanced CT, FOBT, CEA, CA125 and CA19-9 without substantially increasing the delayed treatment of malignant tumors. YiDiXie™-HS significantly reduced false negative rates for UGI imaging, enhanced CT, FOBT, CEA, CA125 and CA19-9. YiDiXie™-SS and YiDiXie™-HS have important diagnostic value in esophageal cancer, and are expected to solve the two problems of "too high false positive rate such as UGI imaging" and "too high false negative rate such as UGI imaging" in esophageal cancer. Clinical trial number: ChiCTR2200066840. Key words: Esophageal cancer, UGI imaging, enhanced CT, Fecal occult blood test, CEA, CA125, CA15-3, CA19-9, False-positive, False-negative, YiDiXie™-SS, YiDiXie™-HS
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信