{"title":"预测对治疗有反应的银屑病患者停用不同生物制剂后的复发时间:一项为期12年的多中心队列研究","authors":"Yu-Huei Huang, Sung Jen Hung, Chaw-Ning Lee, Nan-Lin Wu, Rosaline Chung-yee Hui, Tsen-Fang Tsai, Chang-Ming Huang, Hsien-Yi Chiu","doi":"10.1007/s40257-024-00887-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>For patients with psoriasis, discontinuation of biologics following remission has become more common in daily practice.</p><h3>Objective</h3><p>We aimed to identify predictors and construct a predictive model for time to relapse following withdrawal from biologics.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This 12-year, multicenter, observational cohort study was performed in six dermatology centers between February 2011 and February 2024. We identified biological treatment episodes in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis and included only treatment episodes in which a clinical response (≥ 50% reduction in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score [PASI 50] from baseline) was achieved and the patient withdrew from biological therapy with a well-controlled status (PASI < 10 and ≥ 50% improvement in PASI from baseline). The primary outcome was time to relapse, which was defined as the period from the last biologic administration to relapse. An extended multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis (Prentice–Williams–Peterson Gap time model) was used to predict relapse and generate a predictive model.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>This study screened 1613 biological treatment episodes, and 991 treatment episodes were enrolled. The time to relapse decreased significantly as the number of previous withdrawals from biological treatment increased (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Similarly, the time to relapse decreased significantly as the number of previous biologics used increased (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The maximum PASI improvement during biological treatment decreased and the PASI score at withdrawal of biological treatment increased in parallel as the number of prior withdrawals from biologics increased. The time to relapse following withdrawal was longest for interleukin (IL)-23 inhibitors (IL-23i), followed by the IL-12/23i, IL-17 inhibitors (IL-17i), and tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors. After adjustment, multivariate Cox regression identified the following significant predictors of relapse following withdrawal: the mechanisms of action of biologics (hazard ratio [HR] for IL-17i vs IL-12/23i, 1.59; HR for IL-23i vs IL-12/23i, 0.60), number of previous withdrawals from biological treatment (HR 1.23; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13‒1.33), time to achieve PASI 50 (HR 1.01; 95% CI 1.00‒1.02), maximum PASI improvement on biologics (HR 0.98; 95% CI 0.98‒0.99), and PASI at the end of therapy (HR 1.03; 95% CI 1.01‒1.05). The model had good predictive and discriminative ability.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These results have the potential to help physicians and patients make individualized treatment decisions; information on the risk of relapse of psoriasis at specific timepoints following the withdrawal of biologics is particularly valuable for patients considering discontinuation of biologics or as-needed biologic therapy. However, the benefit and risk of repeated withdrawals of biologics should be carefully weighed, as the treatment efficacy and duration of remission decline as the number of withdrawals increases.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7706,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Dermatology","volume":"25 6","pages":"997 - 1008"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting the Time to Relapse Following Withdrawal from Different Biologics in Patients with Psoriasis who Responded to Therapy: A 12-Year Multicenter Cohort Study\",\"authors\":\"Yu-Huei Huang, Sung Jen Hung, Chaw-Ning Lee, Nan-Lin Wu, Rosaline Chung-yee Hui, Tsen-Fang Tsai, Chang-Ming Huang, Hsien-Yi Chiu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40257-024-00887-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>For patients with psoriasis, discontinuation of biologics following remission has become more common in daily practice.</p><h3>Objective</h3><p>We aimed to identify predictors and construct a predictive model for time to relapse following withdrawal from biologics.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This 12-year, multicenter, observational cohort study was performed in six dermatology centers between February 2011 and February 2024. We identified biological treatment episodes in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis and included only treatment episodes in which a clinical response (≥ 50% reduction in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score [PASI 50] from baseline) was achieved and the patient withdrew from biological therapy with a well-controlled status (PASI < 10 and ≥ 50% improvement in PASI from baseline). The primary outcome was time to relapse, which was defined as the period from the last biologic administration to relapse. An extended multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis (Prentice–Williams–Peterson Gap time model) was used to predict relapse and generate a predictive model.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>This study screened 1613 biological treatment episodes, and 991 treatment episodes were enrolled. The time to relapse decreased significantly as the number of previous withdrawals from biological treatment increased (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Similarly, the time to relapse decreased significantly as the number of previous biologics used increased (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The maximum PASI improvement during biological treatment decreased and the PASI score at withdrawal of biological treatment increased in parallel as the number of prior withdrawals from biologics increased. The time to relapse following withdrawal was longest for interleukin (IL)-23 inhibitors (IL-23i), followed by the IL-12/23i, IL-17 inhibitors (IL-17i), and tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors. After adjustment, multivariate Cox regression identified the following significant predictors of relapse following withdrawal: the mechanisms of action of biologics (hazard ratio [HR] for IL-17i vs IL-12/23i, 1.59; HR for IL-23i vs IL-12/23i, 0.60), number of previous withdrawals from biological treatment (HR 1.23; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13‒1.33), time to achieve PASI 50 (HR 1.01; 95% CI 1.00‒1.02), maximum PASI improvement on biologics (HR 0.98; 95% CI 0.98‒0.99), and PASI at the end of therapy (HR 1.03; 95% CI 1.01‒1.05). The model had good predictive and discriminative ability.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These results have the potential to help physicians and patients make individualized treatment decisions; information on the risk of relapse of psoriasis at specific timepoints following the withdrawal of biologics is particularly valuable for patients considering discontinuation of biologics or as-needed biologic therapy. However, the benefit and risk of repeated withdrawals of biologics should be carefully weighed, as the treatment efficacy and duration of remission decline as the number of withdrawals increases.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7706,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Clinical Dermatology\",\"volume\":\"25 6\",\"pages\":\"997 - 1008\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Clinical Dermatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40257-024-00887-8\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Clinical Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40257-024-00887-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景对于银屑病患者来说,缓解后停用生物制剂在日常实践中已变得越来越常见。方法这项为期 12 年的多中心观察性队列研究于 2011 年 2 月至 2024 年 2 月期间在六个皮肤病中心进行。我们确定了中度至重度银屑病患者的生物制剂治疗疗程,并仅纳入取得临床应答(银屑病面积和严重程度指数[PASI 50]评分比基线降低≥50%)且患者在良好控制的状态下(PASI < 10且PASI比基线改善≥50%)退出生物制剂治疗的疗程。主要结果是复发时间,即从最后一次使用生物制剂到复发的时间。采用扩展多变量 Cox 比例危险度分析(Prentice-Williams-Peterson Gap 时间模型)预测复发,并生成预测模型。随着以前退出生物治疗次数的增加,复发时间明显缩短(p <0.001)。同样,随着之前使用生物制剂次数的增加,复发时间也明显缩短(p <0.001)。随着之前停用生物制剂次数的增加,生物制剂治疗期间的最大 PASI 改善程度降低,而停用生物制剂时的 PASI 评分也同时增加。白细胞介素(IL)-23抑制剂(IL-23i)的停药后复发时间最长,其次是IL-12/23i、IL-17抑制剂(IL-17i)和肿瘤坏死因子-α抑制剂。经调整后,多变量 Cox 回归确定了以下显著的停药后复发预测因素:生物制剂的作用机制(IL-17i 与 IL-12/23i 的危险比 [HR],1.59;IL-23i 与 IL-12/23i 的危险比 [HR],0.60)、之前退出生物制剂治疗的次数(HR 1.23;95% 置信区间 [CI] 1.13-1.33)、达到 PASI 50 的时间(HR 1.01;95% CI 1.00-1.02)、生物制剂治疗的最大 PASI 改善(HR 0.98;95% CI 0.98-0.99)以及治疗结束时的 PASI(HR 1.03;95% CI 1.01-1.05)。结论这些结果有望帮助医生和患者做出个体化治疗决策;停用生物制剂后特定时间点的银屑病复发风险信息对于考虑停用生物制剂或按需使用生物制剂治疗的患者尤其有价值。然而,应仔细权衡反复停用生物制剂的益处和风险,因为随着停药次数的增加,治疗效果和缓解持续时间都会缩短。
Predicting the Time to Relapse Following Withdrawal from Different Biologics in Patients with Psoriasis who Responded to Therapy: A 12-Year Multicenter Cohort Study
Background
For patients with psoriasis, discontinuation of biologics following remission has become more common in daily practice.
Objective
We aimed to identify predictors and construct a predictive model for time to relapse following withdrawal from biologics.
Methods
This 12-year, multicenter, observational cohort study was performed in six dermatology centers between February 2011 and February 2024. We identified biological treatment episodes in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis and included only treatment episodes in which a clinical response (≥ 50% reduction in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score [PASI 50] from baseline) was achieved and the patient withdrew from biological therapy with a well-controlled status (PASI < 10 and ≥ 50% improvement in PASI from baseline). The primary outcome was time to relapse, which was defined as the period from the last biologic administration to relapse. An extended multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis (Prentice–Williams–Peterson Gap time model) was used to predict relapse and generate a predictive model.
Results
This study screened 1613 biological treatment episodes, and 991 treatment episodes were enrolled. The time to relapse decreased significantly as the number of previous withdrawals from biological treatment increased (p < 0.001). Similarly, the time to relapse decreased significantly as the number of previous biologics used increased (p < 0.001). The maximum PASI improvement during biological treatment decreased and the PASI score at withdrawal of biological treatment increased in parallel as the number of prior withdrawals from biologics increased. The time to relapse following withdrawal was longest for interleukin (IL)-23 inhibitors (IL-23i), followed by the IL-12/23i, IL-17 inhibitors (IL-17i), and tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors. After adjustment, multivariate Cox regression identified the following significant predictors of relapse following withdrawal: the mechanisms of action of biologics (hazard ratio [HR] for IL-17i vs IL-12/23i, 1.59; HR for IL-23i vs IL-12/23i, 0.60), number of previous withdrawals from biological treatment (HR 1.23; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13‒1.33), time to achieve PASI 50 (HR 1.01; 95% CI 1.00‒1.02), maximum PASI improvement on biologics (HR 0.98; 95% CI 0.98‒0.99), and PASI at the end of therapy (HR 1.03; 95% CI 1.01‒1.05). The model had good predictive and discriminative ability.
Conclusions
These results have the potential to help physicians and patients make individualized treatment decisions; information on the risk of relapse of psoriasis at specific timepoints following the withdrawal of biologics is particularly valuable for patients considering discontinuation of biologics or as-needed biologic therapy. However, the benefit and risk of repeated withdrawals of biologics should be carefully weighed, as the treatment efficacy and duration of remission decline as the number of withdrawals increases.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Clinical Dermatology is dedicated to evidence-based therapy and effective patient management in dermatology. It publishes critical review articles and clinically focused original research covering comprehensive aspects of dermatological conditions. The journal enhances visibility and educational value through features like Key Points summaries, plain language summaries, and various digital elements, ensuring accessibility and depth for a diverse readership.