Archak Purkayastha, Giacomo Guarnieri, Janet Anders, Marco Merkli
{"title":"论开放量子系统与孤立量子系统中热化的区别:案例研究","authors":"Archak Purkayastha, Giacomo Guarnieri, Janet Anders, Marco Merkli","doi":"arxiv-2409.11932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Thermalization of isolated and open quantum systems has been studied\nextensively. However, being the subject of investigation by different\nscientific communities and being analysed using different mathematical tools,\nthe connection between the isolated (IQS) and open (OQS) approaches to\nthermalization has remained opaque. Here we demonstrate that the fundamental\ndifference between the two paradigms is the order in which the long time and\nthe thermodynamic limits are taken. This difference implies that they describe\nphysics on widely different time and length scales. Our analysis is carried out\nnumerically for the case of a double quantum dot (DQD) coupled to a fermionic\nlead. We show how both OQS and IQS thermalization can be explored in this model\non equal footing, allowing a fair comparison between the two. We find that\nwhile the quadratically coupled (free) DQD experiences no isolated\nthermalization, it of course does experience open thermalization. For the\nnon-linearly interacting DQD coupled to fermionic lead, we show by\ncharacterizing its spectral form factor and level spacing distribution, that\nthe system falls in the twilight zone between integrable and non-integrable\nregimes, which we call partially non-integrable. We further evidence that,\ndespite being only partially non-integrable and thereby falling outside the\nremit of the standard eigenstate thermalization hypothesis, it nevertheless\nexperiences IQS as well as OQS thermalization.","PeriodicalId":501226,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Quantum Physics","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the difference between thermalization in open and isolated quantum systems: a case study\",\"authors\":\"Archak Purkayastha, Giacomo Guarnieri, Janet Anders, Marco Merkli\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.11932\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Thermalization of isolated and open quantum systems has been studied\\nextensively. However, being the subject of investigation by different\\nscientific communities and being analysed using different mathematical tools,\\nthe connection between the isolated (IQS) and open (OQS) approaches to\\nthermalization has remained opaque. Here we demonstrate that the fundamental\\ndifference between the two paradigms is the order in which the long time and\\nthe thermodynamic limits are taken. This difference implies that they describe\\nphysics on widely different time and length scales. Our analysis is carried out\\nnumerically for the case of a double quantum dot (DQD) coupled to a fermionic\\nlead. We show how both OQS and IQS thermalization can be explored in this model\\non equal footing, allowing a fair comparison between the two. We find that\\nwhile the quadratically coupled (free) DQD experiences no isolated\\nthermalization, it of course does experience open thermalization. For the\\nnon-linearly interacting DQD coupled to fermionic lead, we show by\\ncharacterizing its spectral form factor and level spacing distribution, that\\nthe system falls in the twilight zone between integrable and non-integrable\\nregimes, which we call partially non-integrable. We further evidence that,\\ndespite being only partially non-integrable and thereby falling outside the\\nremit of the standard eigenstate thermalization hypothesis, it nevertheless\\nexperiences IQS as well as OQS thermalization.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - PHYS - Quantum Physics\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - PHYS - Quantum Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.11932\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Quantum Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.11932","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
On the difference between thermalization in open and isolated quantum systems: a case study
Thermalization of isolated and open quantum systems has been studied
extensively. However, being the subject of investigation by different
scientific communities and being analysed using different mathematical tools,
the connection between the isolated (IQS) and open (OQS) approaches to
thermalization has remained opaque. Here we demonstrate that the fundamental
difference between the two paradigms is the order in which the long time and
the thermodynamic limits are taken. This difference implies that they describe
physics on widely different time and length scales. Our analysis is carried out
numerically for the case of a double quantum dot (DQD) coupled to a fermionic
lead. We show how both OQS and IQS thermalization can be explored in this model
on equal footing, allowing a fair comparison between the two. We find that
while the quadratically coupled (free) DQD experiences no isolated
thermalization, it of course does experience open thermalization. For the
non-linearly interacting DQD coupled to fermionic lead, we show by
characterizing its spectral form factor and level spacing distribution, that
the system falls in the twilight zone between integrable and non-integrable
regimes, which we call partially non-integrable. We further evidence that,
despite being only partially non-integrable and thereby falling outside the
remit of the standard eigenstate thermalization hypothesis, it nevertheless
experiences IQS as well as OQS thermalization.