急性心力衰竭的室性心律失常。急性心血管护理协会 (ACVC)、欧洲心脏节律协会 (EHRA) 和 ESC 心力衰竭协会 (HFA) 临床共识声明

Bulent Gorenek, Adrianus P Wijnmaalen, Andreas Goette, Gurbet Ozge Mert, Bradley Porter, Finn Gustafsson, Gheorghe Andrei Dan, Joris Ector, Markus Stuehlinger, Michael Spartalis, Nils Gosau, Offer Amir, Ovidiu Chioncel
{"title":"急性心力衰竭的室性心律失常。急性心血管护理协会 (ACVC)、欧洲心脏节律协会 (EHRA) 和 ESC 心力衰竭协会 (HFA) 临床共识声明","authors":"Bulent Gorenek, Adrianus P Wijnmaalen, Andreas Goette, Gurbet Ozge Mert, Bradley Porter, Finn Gustafsson, Gheorghe Andrei Dan, Joris Ector, Markus Stuehlinger, Michael Spartalis, Nils Gosau, Offer Amir, Ovidiu Chioncel","doi":"10.1093/europace/euae235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Patients presenting with or alerting emergency networks due to acute heart failure (AHF) form a diverse group with a plethora of symptoms, risks, comorbidities, and aetiologies. During AHF, there is an increased risk of destabilizing the functional substrate and modulatory adding to the risk of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) already created by the structural substrate. New VAs during AHF have previously identified patients with higher intra-hospital and 60-day morbidity and mortality. Risk stratification and criteria/best time point for coronary intervention and implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation, however, are still controversial topics in this difficult clinical setting. The characteristics and logistics of prehospital emergency medicine, as well as the density of centers capable of treating AHF and VAs, differ massively throughout Europe. Scientific guidelines provide clear recommendations for the management of arrhythmias in chronic HF patients. However, the incidence, significance, and management of arrhythmias in patients with AHF have been less studied. This consensus paper aimed to address the identification and treatment of VAs that complicate the course of patients who have AHF, including cardiogenic shock.","PeriodicalId":11720,"journal":{"name":"EP Europace","volume":"525 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ventricular Arrhythmias in Acute Heart Failure. A Clinical Consensus Statement of the Association for Acute CardioVascular Care Association (ACVC), the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) and the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC\",\"authors\":\"Bulent Gorenek, Adrianus P Wijnmaalen, Andreas Goette, Gurbet Ozge Mert, Bradley Porter, Finn Gustafsson, Gheorghe Andrei Dan, Joris Ector, Markus Stuehlinger, Michael Spartalis, Nils Gosau, Offer Amir, Ovidiu Chioncel\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/europace/euae235\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Patients presenting with or alerting emergency networks due to acute heart failure (AHF) form a diverse group with a plethora of symptoms, risks, comorbidities, and aetiologies. During AHF, there is an increased risk of destabilizing the functional substrate and modulatory adding to the risk of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) already created by the structural substrate. New VAs during AHF have previously identified patients with higher intra-hospital and 60-day morbidity and mortality. Risk stratification and criteria/best time point for coronary intervention and implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation, however, are still controversial topics in this difficult clinical setting. The characteristics and logistics of prehospital emergency medicine, as well as the density of centers capable of treating AHF and VAs, differ massively throughout Europe. Scientific guidelines provide clear recommendations for the management of arrhythmias in chronic HF patients. However, the incidence, significance, and management of arrhythmias in patients with AHF have been less studied. This consensus paper aimed to address the identification and treatment of VAs that complicate the course of patients who have AHF, including cardiogenic shock.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11720,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EP Europace\",\"volume\":\"525 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EP Europace\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euae235\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EP Europace","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euae235","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

因急性心力衰竭(AHF)而出现或向急救网络报警的患者是一个多样化的群体,其症状、风险、合并症和病因多种多样。在急性心力衰竭(AHF)期间,功能基质和调节基质失稳的风险会增加,而结构基质已经产生的室性心律失常(VAs)的风险也会增加。在 AHF 期间出现新的室性心律失常之前,已确定患者在院内和 60 天内的发病率和死亡率较高。然而,在这种困难的临床环境中,风险分层以及冠状动脉介入治疗和植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)的标准/最佳时间点仍是有争议的话题。院前急救医疗的特点和后勤保障,以及能够治疗心房颤动和脑梗塞的中心密度,在欧洲各地存在巨大差异。科学指南为慢性高血压患者的心律失常管理提供了明确的建议。然而,对 AHF 患者心律失常的发生率、重要性和处理方法的研究却较少。本共识文件旨在探讨如何识别和治疗使 AHF 患者(包括心源性休克)病程复杂化的心律失常。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ventricular Arrhythmias in Acute Heart Failure. A Clinical Consensus Statement of the Association for Acute CardioVascular Care Association (ACVC), the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) and the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC
Patients presenting with or alerting emergency networks due to acute heart failure (AHF) form a diverse group with a plethora of symptoms, risks, comorbidities, and aetiologies. During AHF, there is an increased risk of destabilizing the functional substrate and modulatory adding to the risk of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) already created by the structural substrate. New VAs during AHF have previously identified patients with higher intra-hospital and 60-day morbidity and mortality. Risk stratification and criteria/best time point for coronary intervention and implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation, however, are still controversial topics in this difficult clinical setting. The characteristics and logistics of prehospital emergency medicine, as well as the density of centers capable of treating AHF and VAs, differ massively throughout Europe. Scientific guidelines provide clear recommendations for the management of arrhythmias in chronic HF patients. However, the incidence, significance, and management of arrhythmias in patients with AHF have been less studied. This consensus paper aimed to address the identification and treatment of VAs that complicate the course of patients who have AHF, including cardiogenic shock.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信