共同设计以家庭为主导的数字化干预措施,预防和管理成年重症患者的谵妄:双钻石设计流程的应用

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Gideon U. Johnson , Amanda Towell-Barnard , Christopher McLean , Glenn Robert , Beverley Ewens
{"title":"共同设计以家庭为主导的数字化干预措施,预防和管理成年重症患者的谵妄:双钻石设计流程的应用","authors":"Gideon U. Johnson ,&nbsp;Amanda Towell-Barnard ,&nbsp;Christopher McLean ,&nbsp;Glenn Robert ,&nbsp;Beverley Ewens","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Co-designing healthcare interventions is gaining recognition as a novel and collaborative method. Co-design involves end-users from the start, ensuring that an intervention best meets their needs. Despite its potential benefits, this approach is not yet widely used in developing clinical interventions within intensive care units where the perspectives of patients, family members, and clinicians are crucial.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To describe the application, benefits and challenges of the Double Diamond model to co-design a digital family-led voice reorientation intervention for delirium prevention and management in critically ill adult patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The co-design process was guided by the Double Diamond model over a period of 12 months. Development involved patients, family members, and nursing and medical staff as co-designers and decision-makers in the iterative development of the intervention. Data from field notes and group meetings were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and content analysed at each phase, which were then presented to the co-designers for verification and refinement.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Co-designers included people with lived experience of the ICU as patients (n = 5) and family members (n = 1) and clinical experts (nursing staff n = 3; medical staff n = 3). Co-designers were highly engaged and reported positive experiences and collaboration in the co-design process. Sharing the diversity of their own personal ICU experiences was found to be beneficial as it not only validated individual feelings but also strengthened intervention development. Differences in interpretations and meanings of the voice messages proposed as part of the intervention were challenging. Maintaining sufficient focus on each phase of the Double Diamond was difficult due to the complexity of the context in which the intervention was being co-designed and the resulting challenges of maintaining the engagement of the co-designers throughout the process.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>There were benefits and challenges of engaging people with lived experience in an intensive care unit as co-designers through the Double Diamond design process to develop a digital family-led intervention for delirium prevention and management. Overall, applying the Double Diamond to co-design a clinical intervention is recommended, whereby the collaboration process benefits patients, family members, and clinical staff.</p></div><div><h3>Registration number</h3><p>ACTRN12622001568707; <span><span>ANZCTR — Registration</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50299,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies","volume":"160 ","pages":"Article 104888"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020748924002013/pdfft?md5=cc54221b09f0d98bd53e433939c8fb4c&pid=1-s2.0-S0020748924002013-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Co-designing a digital family-led intervention for delirium prevention and management in adult critically ill patients: An application of the double diamond design process\",\"authors\":\"Gideon U. Johnson ,&nbsp;Amanda Towell-Barnard ,&nbsp;Christopher McLean ,&nbsp;Glenn Robert ,&nbsp;Beverley Ewens\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104888\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Co-designing healthcare interventions is gaining recognition as a novel and collaborative method. Co-design involves end-users from the start, ensuring that an intervention best meets their needs. Despite its potential benefits, this approach is not yet widely used in developing clinical interventions within intensive care units where the perspectives of patients, family members, and clinicians are crucial.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To describe the application, benefits and challenges of the Double Diamond model to co-design a digital family-led voice reorientation intervention for delirium prevention and management in critically ill adult patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The co-design process was guided by the Double Diamond model over a period of 12 months. Development involved patients, family members, and nursing and medical staff as co-designers and decision-makers in the iterative development of the intervention. Data from field notes and group meetings were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and content analysed at each phase, which were then presented to the co-designers for verification and refinement.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Co-designers included people with lived experience of the ICU as patients (n = 5) and family members (n = 1) and clinical experts (nursing staff n = 3; medical staff n = 3). Co-designers were highly engaged and reported positive experiences and collaboration in the co-design process. Sharing the diversity of their own personal ICU experiences was found to be beneficial as it not only validated individual feelings but also strengthened intervention development. Differences in interpretations and meanings of the voice messages proposed as part of the intervention were challenging. Maintaining sufficient focus on each phase of the Double Diamond was difficult due to the complexity of the context in which the intervention was being co-designed and the resulting challenges of maintaining the engagement of the co-designers throughout the process.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>There were benefits and challenges of engaging people with lived experience in an intensive care unit as co-designers through the Double Diamond design process to develop a digital family-led intervention for delirium prevention and management. Overall, applying the Double Diamond to co-design a clinical intervention is recommended, whereby the collaboration process benefits patients, family members, and clinical staff.</p></div><div><h3>Registration number</h3><p>ACTRN12622001568707; <span><span>ANZCTR — Registration</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Nursing Studies\",\"volume\":\"160 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104888\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020748924002013/pdfft?md5=cc54221b09f0d98bd53e433939c8fb4c&pid=1-s2.0-S0020748924002013-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Nursing Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020748924002013\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Studies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020748924002013","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景共同设计医疗保健干预措施作为一种新颖的协作方法,正在得到越来越多的认可。共同设计让最终用户从一开始就参与进来,确保干预措施最符合他们的需求。尽管这种方法具有潜在的益处,但在重症监护病房开发临床干预措施时,这种方法尚未得到广泛应用,因为在重症监护病房,患者、家属和临床医生的观点至关重要。方法在为期 12 个月的时间里,共同设计过程以双钻模型为指导。患者、家属、护理人员和医务人员作为共同设计者和决策者参与了干预措施的迭代开发。对现场记录和小组会议的数据进行了录音、逐字转录,并对每个阶段的内容进行了分析,然后提交给共同设计师进行验证和完善。共同设计者在共同设计过程中高度参与并报告了积极的体验和合作。他们认为,分享自己在重症监护室的不同个人经历是有益的,因为这不仅验证了个人感受,还加强了干预措施的开发。作为干预措施的一部分,对语音信息的解释和含义存在差异是一项挑战。由于共同设计干预措施的背景非常复杂,在整个过程中保持共同设计者的参与度也是一项挑战,因此在 "双钻型 "的每个阶段都保持足够的关注度非常困难。总之,建议应用 "双钻型 "共同设计临床干预措施,使患者、家庭成员和临床工作人员在合作过程中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Co-designing a digital family-led intervention for delirium prevention and management in adult critically ill patients: An application of the double diamond design process

Background

Co-designing healthcare interventions is gaining recognition as a novel and collaborative method. Co-design involves end-users from the start, ensuring that an intervention best meets their needs. Despite its potential benefits, this approach is not yet widely used in developing clinical interventions within intensive care units where the perspectives of patients, family members, and clinicians are crucial.

Objective

To describe the application, benefits and challenges of the Double Diamond model to co-design a digital family-led voice reorientation intervention for delirium prevention and management in critically ill adult patients.

Methods

The co-design process was guided by the Double Diamond model over a period of 12 months. Development involved patients, family members, and nursing and medical staff as co-designers and decision-makers in the iterative development of the intervention. Data from field notes and group meetings were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and content analysed at each phase, which were then presented to the co-designers for verification and refinement.

Findings

Co-designers included people with lived experience of the ICU as patients (n = 5) and family members (n = 1) and clinical experts (nursing staff n = 3; medical staff n = 3). Co-designers were highly engaged and reported positive experiences and collaboration in the co-design process. Sharing the diversity of their own personal ICU experiences was found to be beneficial as it not only validated individual feelings but also strengthened intervention development. Differences in interpretations and meanings of the voice messages proposed as part of the intervention were challenging. Maintaining sufficient focus on each phase of the Double Diamond was difficult due to the complexity of the context in which the intervention was being co-designed and the resulting challenges of maintaining the engagement of the co-designers throughout the process.

Conclusions

There were benefits and challenges of engaging people with lived experience in an intensive care unit as co-designers through the Double Diamond design process to develop a digital family-led intervention for delirium prevention and management. Overall, applying the Double Diamond to co-design a clinical intervention is recommended, whereby the collaboration process benefits patients, family members, and clinical staff.

Registration number

ACTRN12622001568707; ANZCTR — Registration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.00
自引率
2.50%
发文量
181
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Nursing Studies (IJNS) is a highly respected journal that has been publishing original peer-reviewed articles since 1963. It provides a forum for original research and scholarship about health care delivery, organisation, management, workforce, policy, and research methods relevant to nursing, midwifery, and other health related professions. The journal aims to support evidence informed policy and practice by publishing research, systematic and other scholarly reviews, critical discussion, and commentary of the highest standard. The IJNS is indexed in major databases including PubMed, Medline, Thomson Reuters - Science Citation Index, Scopus, Thomson Reuters - Social Science Citation Index, CINAHL, and the BNI (British Nursing Index).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信