与威胁和贫困相关的童年暴露与儿童心理健康和成长的关系:家庭复原力的调节作用

IF 2.4 2区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Helal Uddin , Azharul Islam , Lutfun Nahar Lata , Shamsun Nahar , M. Zakir Hossin , Jalal Uddin
{"title":"与威胁和贫困相关的童年暴露与儿童心理健康和成长的关系:家庭复原力的调节作用","authors":"Helal Uddin ,&nbsp;Azharul Islam ,&nbsp;Lutfun Nahar Lata ,&nbsp;Shamsun Nahar ,&nbsp;M. Zakir Hossin ,&nbsp;Jalal Uddin","doi":"10.1016/j.childyouth.2024.107912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The association of adverse childhood experience (ACE) with physical and mental well-being is predominantly examined using a cumulative ACE score. However, less is known how different dimensions of adversity (e.g., threat and deprivation) may uniquely predict children’s mental health and development. We examined (i) whether two aspects of ACE – threat and deprivation – are differently associated with children’s anxiety, depression, and flourishing and (ii) whether family resilience and connection index (FRCI) moderates these associations.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We analyzed data from the National Survey of Children’s Health (2017–20). The analytic sample consisted of 81,626 children (6–17 years). Logistic regression with survey weights was used to obtain odds ratios (OR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) adjusting for sociodemographic factors.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The experience of threat-only ACE and deprivation-only ACE showed differential associations with anxiety, depression, and child flourishing. For example, children who experienced threat-only ACE had a 4.2-fold higher odds of depression (OR=4.2; 95 % CI: 3.37–5.24), and those who experienced deprivation-only ACE had a 2.4-fold (OR=2.4; 95 % CI: 1.98–2.92) higher odds of depression compared to those exposed to neither threat nor deprivation experience. Experiencing both a threat and deprivation showed larger than an additive association with all outcomes. Further, interaction models suggest that the associations of threat and deprivation-type ACE with all outcomes significantly differed by the levels of FRCI.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Threat and deprivation dimensions of adversity were differentially associated with mental health and flourishing outcomes in childhood. Family resilience appears to be protective against the negative effect of threat and deprivation dimensions of ACE on children’s mental health and developmental outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48428,"journal":{"name":"Children and Youth Services Review","volume":"166 ","pages":"Article 107912"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740924004845/pdfft?md5=da8e4f73f302efcb9df783fc9ca18e1d&pid=1-s2.0-S0190740924004845-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Associations of threat and deprivation-related childhood exposures with children’s mental health and flourishing: The moderating role of family resilience\",\"authors\":\"Helal Uddin ,&nbsp;Azharul Islam ,&nbsp;Lutfun Nahar Lata ,&nbsp;Shamsun Nahar ,&nbsp;M. Zakir Hossin ,&nbsp;Jalal Uddin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.childyouth.2024.107912\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The association of adverse childhood experience (ACE) with physical and mental well-being is predominantly examined using a cumulative ACE score. However, less is known how different dimensions of adversity (e.g., threat and deprivation) may uniquely predict children’s mental health and development. We examined (i) whether two aspects of ACE – threat and deprivation – are differently associated with children’s anxiety, depression, and flourishing and (ii) whether family resilience and connection index (FRCI) moderates these associations.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We analyzed data from the National Survey of Children’s Health (2017–20). The analytic sample consisted of 81,626 children (6–17 years). Logistic regression with survey weights was used to obtain odds ratios (OR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) adjusting for sociodemographic factors.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The experience of threat-only ACE and deprivation-only ACE showed differential associations with anxiety, depression, and child flourishing. For example, children who experienced threat-only ACE had a 4.2-fold higher odds of depression (OR=4.2; 95 % CI: 3.37–5.24), and those who experienced deprivation-only ACE had a 2.4-fold (OR=2.4; 95 % CI: 1.98–2.92) higher odds of depression compared to those exposed to neither threat nor deprivation experience. Experiencing both a threat and deprivation showed larger than an additive association with all outcomes. Further, interaction models suggest that the associations of threat and deprivation-type ACE with all outcomes significantly differed by the levels of FRCI.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Threat and deprivation dimensions of adversity were differentially associated with mental health and flourishing outcomes in childhood. Family resilience appears to be protective against the negative effect of threat and deprivation dimensions of ACE on children’s mental health and developmental outcomes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48428,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Children and Youth Services Review\",\"volume\":\"166 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107912\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740924004845/pdfft?md5=da8e4f73f302efcb9df783fc9ca18e1d&pid=1-s2.0-S0190740924004845-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Children and Youth Services Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740924004845\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Children and Youth Services Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740924004845","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:童年逆境经历(ACE)与身心健康的关系主要通过 ACE 累积得分来研究。然而,人们对逆境的不同方面(如威胁和贫困)如何独特地预测儿童的心理健康和发展却知之甚少。我们研究了(i)ACE的两个方面--威胁和匮乏--是否与儿童的焦虑、抑郁和成长有不同的关联,以及(ii)家庭复原力和联系指数(FRCI)是否调节了这些关联。分析样本包括 81626 名儿童(6-17 岁)。结果纯威胁性 ACE 和纯剥夺性 ACE 与焦虑、抑郁和儿童成长表现出不同的关联。例如,与那些既没有受到威胁也没有受到剥夺的儿童相比,那些只经历过威胁性 ACE 的儿童患抑郁症的几率要高出 4.2 倍(OR=4.2;95 % CI:3.37-5.24),而那些只经历过剥夺性 ACE 的儿童患抑郁症的几率要高出 2.4 倍(OR=2.4;95 % CI:1.98-2.92)。同时经历威胁和匮乏与所有结果的关系都大于相加关系。此外,交互模型表明,威胁型和匮乏型逆境教育与所有结果的关系因家庭复原力指数的不同而有显著差异。家庭复原力似乎可以抵御威胁型和剥夺型 ACE 对儿童心理健康和发展结果的负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Associations of threat and deprivation-related childhood exposures with children’s mental health and flourishing: The moderating role of family resilience

Introduction

The association of adverse childhood experience (ACE) with physical and mental well-being is predominantly examined using a cumulative ACE score. However, less is known how different dimensions of adversity (e.g., threat and deprivation) may uniquely predict children’s mental health and development. We examined (i) whether two aspects of ACE – threat and deprivation – are differently associated with children’s anxiety, depression, and flourishing and (ii) whether family resilience and connection index (FRCI) moderates these associations.

Methods

We analyzed data from the National Survey of Children’s Health (2017–20). The analytic sample consisted of 81,626 children (6–17 years). Logistic regression with survey weights was used to obtain odds ratios (OR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) adjusting for sociodemographic factors.

Results

The experience of threat-only ACE and deprivation-only ACE showed differential associations with anxiety, depression, and child flourishing. For example, children who experienced threat-only ACE had a 4.2-fold higher odds of depression (OR=4.2; 95 % CI: 3.37–5.24), and those who experienced deprivation-only ACE had a 2.4-fold (OR=2.4; 95 % CI: 1.98–2.92) higher odds of depression compared to those exposed to neither threat nor deprivation experience. Experiencing both a threat and deprivation showed larger than an additive association with all outcomes. Further, interaction models suggest that the associations of threat and deprivation-type ACE with all outcomes significantly differed by the levels of FRCI.

Conclusions

Threat and deprivation dimensions of adversity were differentially associated with mental health and flourishing outcomes in childhood. Family resilience appears to be protective against the negative effect of threat and deprivation dimensions of ACE on children’s mental health and developmental outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
303
期刊介绍: Children and Youth Services Review is an interdisciplinary forum for critical scholarship regarding service programs for children and youth. The journal will publish full-length articles, current research and policy notes, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信