00000 理解收养中断:对收养父母生活经历的解释性现象学分析

IF 2.4 2区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Olivia Parker , Juliane A. Kloess , Sarah Saveker , Gary Urquhart Law
{"title":"00000 理解收养中断:对收养父母生活经历的解释性现象学分析","authors":"Olivia Parker ,&nbsp;Juliane A. Kloess ,&nbsp;Sarah Saveker ,&nbsp;Gary Urquhart Law","doi":"10.1016/j.childyouth.2024.107916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Adoption is typically considered an appropriate means of providing stability for children who have experienced developmental trauma and cannot live with their birth families. Unfortunately, in a small number of cases, adoptive parents are unable to continue to parent their child, and the family therefore experience adoption disruption. The present study explores the lived experiences of adoptive parents who have experienced adoption disruption in order to better understand the meaning they attach to these experiences.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Six participants from England and Wales took part in semi-structured interviews. Interviews were conducted either remotely or in person on premises associated with an independent psychology practice. Interviews were analysed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Participants reported similar experiences of the adoption process and the associated challenges of parenting children who have experienced developmental trauma. Participants’ narratives were summarised using three overarching themes: (1) the relational identity of adoptive families; (2) adoptive parenting as a losing battle; and (3) adoption disruption as a journey of acceptance; comprising seven subthemes in total. Similarities and differences between participants’ meaning-making are described.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Participants’ meaning-making of adoption disruption is discussed in relation to previous literature, as well as theoretical concepts about idiocentrism, ecological systems theory and individual appraisals. The present study contributes to the growing body of literature that describes the determination of adoptive parents in light of significant challenges, and calls for better support for such families in order to help break transgenerational cycles of trauma.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48428,"journal":{"name":"Children and Youth Services Review","volume":"166 ","pages":"Article 107916"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740924004882/pdfft?md5=f9f09c2557c4129f1142cd15204aaece&pid=1-s2.0-S0190740924004882-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"00000Making sense of adoption disruption: An interpretative phenomenological analysis of the lived experiences of adoptive parents\",\"authors\":\"Olivia Parker ,&nbsp;Juliane A. Kloess ,&nbsp;Sarah Saveker ,&nbsp;Gary Urquhart Law\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.childyouth.2024.107916\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Adoption is typically considered an appropriate means of providing stability for children who have experienced developmental trauma and cannot live with their birth families. Unfortunately, in a small number of cases, adoptive parents are unable to continue to parent their child, and the family therefore experience adoption disruption. The present study explores the lived experiences of adoptive parents who have experienced adoption disruption in order to better understand the meaning they attach to these experiences.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Six participants from England and Wales took part in semi-structured interviews. Interviews were conducted either remotely or in person on premises associated with an independent psychology practice. Interviews were analysed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Participants reported similar experiences of the adoption process and the associated challenges of parenting children who have experienced developmental trauma. Participants’ narratives were summarised using three overarching themes: (1) the relational identity of adoptive families; (2) adoptive parenting as a losing battle; and (3) adoption disruption as a journey of acceptance; comprising seven subthemes in total. Similarities and differences between participants’ meaning-making are described.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Participants’ meaning-making of adoption disruption is discussed in relation to previous literature, as well as theoretical concepts about idiocentrism, ecological systems theory and individual appraisals. The present study contributes to the growing body of literature that describes the determination of adoptive parents in light of significant challenges, and calls for better support for such families in order to help break transgenerational cycles of trauma.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48428,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Children and Youth Services Review\",\"volume\":\"166 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107916\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740924004882/pdfft?md5=f9f09c2557c4129f1142cd15204aaece&pid=1-s2.0-S0190740924004882-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Children and Youth Services Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740924004882\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Children and Youth Services Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740924004882","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景收养通常被认为是为那些经历过成长创伤、无法与亲生家庭生活在一起的儿童提供稳定生活的适当方式。不幸的是,在少数情况下,养父母无法继续抚养其子女,收养家庭因此出现收养中断。本研究探讨了经历过收养中断的养父母的生活经历,以更好地了解他们对这些经历所赋予的意义。方法来自英格兰和威尔士的六名参与者参加了半结构化访谈。访谈在一家独立心理学机构的相关场所进行,或远程进行,或当面进行。访谈采用解释性现象分析法进行分析。研究结果参与者报告了收养过程中的相似经历,以及养育经历过发育创伤的儿童所面临的相关挑战。我们用三个总主题对参与者的叙述进行了总结:(1) 收养家庭的关系身份;(2) 收养子女是一场失败的战斗;(3) 收养中断是一个接受的过程;共包括七个次主题。本研究结合以前的文献以及有关白痴中心主义、生态系统论和个人评价的理论概念,讨论了参与者对收养中断的意义建构。越来越多的文献描述了收养父母在面临重大挑战时的决心,本研究为这些文献做出了贡献,并呼吁为这些家庭提供更好的支持,以帮助打破跨代的创伤循环。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
00000Making sense of adoption disruption: An interpretative phenomenological analysis of the lived experiences of adoptive parents

Background

Adoption is typically considered an appropriate means of providing stability for children who have experienced developmental trauma and cannot live with their birth families. Unfortunately, in a small number of cases, adoptive parents are unable to continue to parent their child, and the family therefore experience adoption disruption. The present study explores the lived experiences of adoptive parents who have experienced adoption disruption in order to better understand the meaning they attach to these experiences.

Method

Six participants from England and Wales took part in semi-structured interviews. Interviews were conducted either remotely or in person on premises associated with an independent psychology practice. Interviews were analysed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis.

Findings

Participants reported similar experiences of the adoption process and the associated challenges of parenting children who have experienced developmental trauma. Participants’ narratives were summarised using three overarching themes: (1) the relational identity of adoptive families; (2) adoptive parenting as a losing battle; and (3) adoption disruption as a journey of acceptance; comprising seven subthemes in total. Similarities and differences between participants’ meaning-making are described.

Conclusions

Participants’ meaning-making of adoption disruption is discussed in relation to previous literature, as well as theoretical concepts about idiocentrism, ecological systems theory and individual appraisals. The present study contributes to the growing body of literature that describes the determination of adoptive parents in light of significant challenges, and calls for better support for such families in order to help break transgenerational cycles of trauma.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
303
期刊介绍: Children and Youth Services Review is an interdisciplinary forum for critical scholarship regarding service programs for children and youth. The journal will publish full-length articles, current research and policy notes, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信