非洲小农系统中羊的肠道甲烷排放系数估算方法比较:埃塞俄比亚案例研究

IF 1.6 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
{"title":"非洲小农系统中羊的肠道甲烷排放系数估算方法比较:埃塞俄比亚案例研究","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.smallrumres.2024.107362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In Ethiopia, enteric methane emissions from sheep contribute around 7 % to the national greenhouse gas (GHG) budget. This study examined the gross energy intake (GEI) and enteric methane emission factors (EFs) of sheep in smallholder systems in North Shewa, Ethiopia, using locally derived data via household surveys. The surveys encompassed two agroecological zones (AEZs) and analyzed various sheep classes across seasons. The study followed the Commonwealth Scientific Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO) Tier 2 methodology, which had previously been used in Kenya, and compared the results with those derived from the 2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC Tier 2) methodology. The EFs from the two Tier 2 methodologies were compared with IPCC default Tier 1 EF. The ranges of GEI and EF estimated for the different sheep classes showed similarity with larger variations observed for IPCC Tier 2 estimates. The estimated GEI for the various sheep classes ranged from 11.1 to 13.8 MJ day<sup>−1</sup> (‘CSIRO’ Tier 2) and 10.2–14.7 MJ day<sup>−1</sup> (IPCC Tier 2). The estimated EFs ranged from 4.8 to 5.9 kg CH<sub>4</sub> animal<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup> (‘CSIRO’ Tier 2) and 4.5–6.5 kg CH<sub>4</sub> animal<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup> (IPCC Tier 2). The flock-level EF was computed by aggregating the EFs of the different sheep categories. The flock level EF estimated by the IPCC Tier 2 (6.0 ± 0.1 kg CH<sub>4</sub> animal<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>) was significantly higher compared to both the 'CSIRO' Tier 2 and IPCC Tier 1 methods. Based on the findings, we can say that variations in EF values emphasize the significance of taking different Tier 2 approaches into account when evaluating and comparing CH<sub>4</sub> emissions estimates in smallholder sheep farming systems. However, there is a need for further investigations to compare the two Tier 2 methodologies against actual intake and emission measurements to decide which methodology is better.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21758,"journal":{"name":"Small Ruminant Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921448824001688/pdfft?md5=ce8e0b15982b2aab22dc0ed13c3ffa1b&pid=1-s2.0-S0921448824001688-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of methodologies for estimating enteric methane emission factors from sheep in smallholder systems in Africa: A case study from Ethiopia\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.smallrumres.2024.107362\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In Ethiopia, enteric methane emissions from sheep contribute around 7 % to the national greenhouse gas (GHG) budget. This study examined the gross energy intake (GEI) and enteric methane emission factors (EFs) of sheep in smallholder systems in North Shewa, Ethiopia, using locally derived data via household surveys. The surveys encompassed two agroecological zones (AEZs) and analyzed various sheep classes across seasons. The study followed the Commonwealth Scientific Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO) Tier 2 methodology, which had previously been used in Kenya, and compared the results with those derived from the 2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC Tier 2) methodology. The EFs from the two Tier 2 methodologies were compared with IPCC default Tier 1 EF. The ranges of GEI and EF estimated for the different sheep classes showed similarity with larger variations observed for IPCC Tier 2 estimates. The estimated GEI for the various sheep classes ranged from 11.1 to 13.8 MJ day<sup>−1</sup> (‘CSIRO’ Tier 2) and 10.2–14.7 MJ day<sup>−1</sup> (IPCC Tier 2). The estimated EFs ranged from 4.8 to 5.9 kg CH<sub>4</sub> animal<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup> (‘CSIRO’ Tier 2) and 4.5–6.5 kg CH<sub>4</sub> animal<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup> (IPCC Tier 2). The flock-level EF was computed by aggregating the EFs of the different sheep categories. The flock level EF estimated by the IPCC Tier 2 (6.0 ± 0.1 kg CH<sub>4</sub> animal<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>) was significantly higher compared to both the 'CSIRO' Tier 2 and IPCC Tier 1 methods. Based on the findings, we can say that variations in EF values emphasize the significance of taking different Tier 2 approaches into account when evaluating and comparing CH<sub>4</sub> emissions estimates in smallholder sheep farming systems. However, there is a need for further investigations to compare the two Tier 2 methodologies against actual intake and emission measurements to decide which methodology is better.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21758,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Small Ruminant Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921448824001688/pdfft?md5=ce8e0b15982b2aab22dc0ed13c3ffa1b&pid=1-s2.0-S0921448824001688-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Small Ruminant Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921448824001688\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Small Ruminant Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921448824001688","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在埃塞俄比亚,羊的肠道甲烷排放量约占全国温室气体(GHG)预算的 7%。本研究利用通过家庭调查获得的当地数据,研究了埃塞俄比亚北谢瓦小农系统中绵羊的总能量摄入量(GEI)和肠道甲烷排放因子(EFs)。调查范围包括两个农业生态区(AEZ),并分析了不同季节的不同绵羊等级。该研究采用了之前曾在肯尼亚使用过的英联邦科学工业研究组织(CSIRO)第 2 级方法,并将其结果与 IPCC 2006 年国家温室气体清单指南 2019 年修订版(IPCC 第 2 级)方法得出的结果进行了比较。两种第 2 级方法得出的环境系数与 IPCC 默认的第 1 级环境系数进行了比较。不同绵羊类别的估计温室气体排放指数(GEI)和排放系数(EF)的范围显示出相似性,而 IPCC 第 2 级估计值的差异较大。不同绵羊等级的估计 GEI 为 11.1 至 13.8 兆焦耳/天-1("CSIRO "第 2 级)和 10.2 至 14.7 兆焦耳/天-1(IPCC 第 2 级)。估计的 EF 为 4.8 至 5.9 千克 CH4 动物-1 年-1("CSIRO "第 2 级)和 4.5 至 6.5 千克 CH4 动物-1 年-1(IPCC 第 2 级)。羊群水平的 EF 是通过汇总不同羊类的 EF 计算得出的。与 "CSIRO "第 2 级方法和 IPCC 第 1 级方法相比,IPCC 第 2 级方法估算的羊群水平 EF(6.0 ± 0.1 kg CH4 animal-1 year-1)明显较高。根据研究结果,我们可以说,EF 值的变化强调了在评估和比较小农养羊系统的 CH4 排放估计值时考虑不同 Tier 2 方法的重要性。不过,还需要进一步调查,将两种第 2 级方法与实际摄入量和排放量测量结果进行比较,以确定哪种方法更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of methodologies for estimating enteric methane emission factors from sheep in smallholder systems in Africa: A case study from Ethiopia

In Ethiopia, enteric methane emissions from sheep contribute around 7 % to the national greenhouse gas (GHG) budget. This study examined the gross energy intake (GEI) and enteric methane emission factors (EFs) of sheep in smallholder systems in North Shewa, Ethiopia, using locally derived data via household surveys. The surveys encompassed two agroecological zones (AEZs) and analyzed various sheep classes across seasons. The study followed the Commonwealth Scientific Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO) Tier 2 methodology, which had previously been used in Kenya, and compared the results with those derived from the 2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC Tier 2) methodology. The EFs from the two Tier 2 methodologies were compared with IPCC default Tier 1 EF. The ranges of GEI and EF estimated for the different sheep classes showed similarity with larger variations observed for IPCC Tier 2 estimates. The estimated GEI for the various sheep classes ranged from 11.1 to 13.8 MJ day−1 (‘CSIRO’ Tier 2) and 10.2–14.7 MJ day−1 (IPCC Tier 2). The estimated EFs ranged from 4.8 to 5.9 kg CH4 animal−1 year−1 (‘CSIRO’ Tier 2) and 4.5–6.5 kg CH4 animal−1 year−1 (IPCC Tier 2). The flock-level EF was computed by aggregating the EFs of the different sheep categories. The flock level EF estimated by the IPCC Tier 2 (6.0 ± 0.1 kg CH4 animal−1 year−1) was significantly higher compared to both the 'CSIRO' Tier 2 and IPCC Tier 1 methods. Based on the findings, we can say that variations in EF values emphasize the significance of taking different Tier 2 approaches into account when evaluating and comparing CH4 emissions estimates in smallholder sheep farming systems. However, there is a need for further investigations to compare the two Tier 2 methodologies against actual intake and emission measurements to decide which methodology is better.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Small Ruminant Research
Small Ruminant Research 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
210
审稿时长
12.5 weeks
期刊介绍: Small Ruminant Research publishes original, basic and applied research articles, technical notes, and review articles on research relating to goats, sheep, deer, the New World camelids llama, alpaca, vicuna and guanaco, and the Old World camels. Topics covered include nutrition, physiology, anatomy, genetics, microbiology, ethology, product technology, socio-economics, management, sustainability and environment, veterinary medicine and husbandry engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信