Carolus H.J. Kusters , Tim J.M. Jaspers , Tim G.W. Boers , Martijn R. Jong , Jelmer B. Jukema , Kiki N. Fockens , Albert J. de Groof , Jacques J. Bergman , Fons van der Sommen , Peter H.N. De With
{"title":"变形器能否改变胃肠道内窥镜图像分析?CNN 与变形器在性能、鲁棒性和通用性方面的比较分析","authors":"Carolus H.J. Kusters , Tim J.M. Jaspers , Tim G.W. Boers , Martijn R. Jong , Jelmer B. Jukema , Kiki N. Fockens , Albert J. de Groof , Jacques J. Bergman , Fons van der Sommen , Peter H.N. De With","doi":"10.1016/j.media.2024.103348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Gastrointestinal endoscopic image analysis presents significant challenges, such as considerable variations in quality due to the challenging in-body imaging environment, the often-subtle nature of abnormalities with low interobserver agreement, and the need for real-time processing. These challenges pose strong requirements on the performance, generalization, robustness and complexity of deep learning-based techniques in such safety–critical applications. While Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) have been the go-to architecture for endoscopic image analysis, recent successes of the Transformer architecture in computer vision raise the possibility to update this conclusion. To this end, we evaluate and compare clinically relevant performance, generalization and robustness of state-of-the-art CNNs and Transformers for neoplasia detection in Barrett’s esophagus. We have trained and validated several top-performing CNNs and Transformers on a total of 10,208 images (2,079 patients), and tested on a total of 7,118 images (998 patients) across multiple test sets, including a high-quality test set, two internal and two external generalization test sets, and a robustness test set. Furthermore, to expand the scope of the study, we have conducted the performance and robustness comparisons for colonic polyp segmentation (Kvasir-SEG) and angiodysplasia detection (Giana). The results obtained for featured models across a wide range of training set sizes demonstrate that Transformers achieve comparable performance as CNNs on various applications, show comparable or slightly improved generalization capabilities and offer equally strong resilience and robustness against common image corruptions and perturbations. These findings confirm the viability of the Transformer architecture, particularly suited to the dynamic nature of endoscopic video analysis, characterized by fluctuating image quality, appearance and equipment configurations in transition from hospital to hospital. The code is made publicly available at: <span><span>https://github.com/BONS-AI-VCA-AMC/Endoscopy-CNNs-vs-Transformers</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18328,"journal":{"name":"Medical image analysis","volume":"99 ","pages":"Article 103348"},"PeriodicalIF":10.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361841524002731/pdfft?md5=6f5df02e55d444d8522ef7477d8446aa&pid=1-s2.0-S1361841524002731-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Will Transformers change gastrointestinal endoscopic image analysis? A comparative analysis between CNNs and Transformers, in terms of performance, robustness and generalization\",\"authors\":\"Carolus H.J. Kusters , Tim J.M. Jaspers , Tim G.W. Boers , Martijn R. Jong , Jelmer B. Jukema , Kiki N. Fockens , Albert J. de Groof , Jacques J. Bergman , Fons van der Sommen , Peter H.N. De With\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.media.2024.103348\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Gastrointestinal endoscopic image analysis presents significant challenges, such as considerable variations in quality due to the challenging in-body imaging environment, the often-subtle nature of abnormalities with low interobserver agreement, and the need for real-time processing. These challenges pose strong requirements on the performance, generalization, robustness and complexity of deep learning-based techniques in such safety–critical applications. While Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) have been the go-to architecture for endoscopic image analysis, recent successes of the Transformer architecture in computer vision raise the possibility to update this conclusion. To this end, we evaluate and compare clinically relevant performance, generalization and robustness of state-of-the-art CNNs and Transformers for neoplasia detection in Barrett’s esophagus. We have trained and validated several top-performing CNNs and Transformers on a total of 10,208 images (2,079 patients), and tested on a total of 7,118 images (998 patients) across multiple test sets, including a high-quality test set, two internal and two external generalization test sets, and a robustness test set. Furthermore, to expand the scope of the study, we have conducted the performance and robustness comparisons for colonic polyp segmentation (Kvasir-SEG) and angiodysplasia detection (Giana). The results obtained for featured models across a wide range of training set sizes demonstrate that Transformers achieve comparable performance as CNNs on various applications, show comparable or slightly improved generalization capabilities and offer equally strong resilience and robustness against common image corruptions and perturbations. These findings confirm the viability of the Transformer architecture, particularly suited to the dynamic nature of endoscopic video analysis, characterized by fluctuating image quality, appearance and equipment configurations in transition from hospital to hospital. The code is made publicly available at: <span><span>https://github.com/BONS-AI-VCA-AMC/Endoscopy-CNNs-vs-Transformers</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical image analysis\",\"volume\":\"99 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103348\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361841524002731/pdfft?md5=6f5df02e55d444d8522ef7477d8446aa&pid=1-s2.0-S1361841524002731-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical image analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361841524002731\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical image analysis","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361841524002731","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Will Transformers change gastrointestinal endoscopic image analysis? A comparative analysis between CNNs and Transformers, in terms of performance, robustness and generalization
Gastrointestinal endoscopic image analysis presents significant challenges, such as considerable variations in quality due to the challenging in-body imaging environment, the often-subtle nature of abnormalities with low interobserver agreement, and the need for real-time processing. These challenges pose strong requirements on the performance, generalization, robustness and complexity of deep learning-based techniques in such safety–critical applications. While Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) have been the go-to architecture for endoscopic image analysis, recent successes of the Transformer architecture in computer vision raise the possibility to update this conclusion. To this end, we evaluate and compare clinically relevant performance, generalization and robustness of state-of-the-art CNNs and Transformers for neoplasia detection in Barrett’s esophagus. We have trained and validated several top-performing CNNs and Transformers on a total of 10,208 images (2,079 patients), and tested on a total of 7,118 images (998 patients) across multiple test sets, including a high-quality test set, two internal and two external generalization test sets, and a robustness test set. Furthermore, to expand the scope of the study, we have conducted the performance and robustness comparisons for colonic polyp segmentation (Kvasir-SEG) and angiodysplasia detection (Giana). The results obtained for featured models across a wide range of training set sizes demonstrate that Transformers achieve comparable performance as CNNs on various applications, show comparable or slightly improved generalization capabilities and offer equally strong resilience and robustness against common image corruptions and perturbations. These findings confirm the viability of the Transformer architecture, particularly suited to the dynamic nature of endoscopic video analysis, characterized by fluctuating image quality, appearance and equipment configurations in transition from hospital to hospital. The code is made publicly available at: https://github.com/BONS-AI-VCA-AMC/Endoscopy-CNNs-vs-Transformers.
期刊介绍:
Medical Image Analysis serves as a platform for sharing new research findings in the realm of medical and biological image analysis, with a focus on applications of computer vision, virtual reality, and robotics to biomedical imaging challenges. The journal prioritizes the publication of high-quality, original papers contributing to the fundamental science of processing, analyzing, and utilizing medical and biological images. It welcomes approaches utilizing biomedical image datasets across all spatial scales, from molecular/cellular imaging to tissue/organ imaging.