Takehiro K. Katoh , Ji-Min Chen , Jin-Hua Yang , Guang Zhang , Lu Wang , Awit Suwito , Paulus Ak Meleng , Masanori J. Toda , Ya-Ping Zhang , Jian-Jun Gao
{"title":"Dichaetophora Duda 属及相关类群(双翅目:果蝇科)的分子系统发育和物种多样性","authors":"Takehiro K. Katoh , Ji-Min Chen , Jin-Hua Yang , Guang Zhang , Lu Wang , Awit Suwito , Paulus Ak Meleng , Masanori J. Toda , Ya-Ping Zhang , Jian-Jun Gao","doi":"10.1016/j.ympev.2024.108194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Our intensive surveys of wild drosophilids in East and Southeast Asia discovered a great species diversity (more than 100 putatively new species) of the genus <em>Dichaetophora</em>, which is currently comprised of 67 formally described species assigned into five species groups, i.e., <em>agbo</em>, <em>tenuicauda</em>, <em>acutissima</em>, <em>sinensis</em> and <em>trilobita</em>. In the present study, we delimited species from a huge amount of samples of <em>Dichaetophora</em> and allied taxa (the genus <em>Mulgravea</em> and the subgenus <em>Dudaica</em> of <em>Drosophila</em>) collected from a wide range of the Oriental and east Palearctic regions. We first sorted all specimens into morpho-species, and representative specimen(s) selected from each morpho-species were subjected to barcoding of <em>COI</em> (the cytochrome <em>c</em> oxidase subunit I gene) sequences. The applied ASAP (Assemble Species by Automatic Partitioning) analysis estimated a total of 166 to 168 MOTUs (molecular operational taxonomic units). Integrating this result with morphological evidence from re-examined, detailed structures of male terminalia, we recognized a total of 144 (109 new and 35 known) species in our sample. Out of them, 83 species representing the supraspecific taxa of <em>Dichaetophora</em>, <em>Mulgravea</em> and <em>Dudaica</em> were selected, along with 33 species from major genera and subgenera of <em>Drosophila</em> in the tribe Drosophilini, as in-group and four species from the tribe Colocasiomyini as out-group for phylogenetic reconstruction based on 12 nuclear gene markers. In the trees constructed by the maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference methods, the three focal taxa (i.e., <em>Dichaetophora</em>, <em>Mulgravea</em> and <em>Dudaica</em>) formed a clade provisionally called the “pan-<em>Dichaetophora</em>”. Within this large clade, the <em>agbo</em>, <em>tenuicauda</em>, <em>sinensis</em> and <em>trilobita</em> groups of <em>Dichaetophora</em>, <em>Mulgravea</em> and <em>Dudaica</em> were recovered as monophyletic groups, but <em>Dichaetophora</em> and its <em>acutissima</em> group were regarded as paraphyletic. In addition, two clusters were recognized among ungrouped species of <em>Dichaetophora</em>. Thus, the present study has uncovered some issues concerning the taxonomy of the pan-<em>Dichaetophora</em>. Such issues will be addressed elsewhere in the phylogenetic reclassification of the pan-<em>Dichaetophora</em>, along with descriptions/redescriptions of a large number of new/known species delimited in the present study.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56109,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution","volume":"201 ","pages":"Article 108194"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Molecular phylogeny and species diversity of the genus Dichaetophora Duda and related taxa (Diptera: Drosophilidae)\",\"authors\":\"Takehiro K. Katoh , Ji-Min Chen , Jin-Hua Yang , Guang Zhang , Lu Wang , Awit Suwito , Paulus Ak Meleng , Masanori J. Toda , Ya-Ping Zhang , Jian-Jun Gao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ympev.2024.108194\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Our intensive surveys of wild drosophilids in East and Southeast Asia discovered a great species diversity (more than 100 putatively new species) of the genus <em>Dichaetophora</em>, which is currently comprised of 67 formally described species assigned into five species groups, i.e., <em>agbo</em>, <em>tenuicauda</em>, <em>acutissima</em>, <em>sinensis</em> and <em>trilobita</em>. In the present study, we delimited species from a huge amount of samples of <em>Dichaetophora</em> and allied taxa (the genus <em>Mulgravea</em> and the subgenus <em>Dudaica</em> of <em>Drosophila</em>) collected from a wide range of the Oriental and east Palearctic regions. We first sorted all specimens into morpho-species, and representative specimen(s) selected from each morpho-species were subjected to barcoding of <em>COI</em> (the cytochrome <em>c</em> oxidase subunit I gene) sequences. The applied ASAP (Assemble Species by Automatic Partitioning) analysis estimated a total of 166 to 168 MOTUs (molecular operational taxonomic units). Integrating this result with morphological evidence from re-examined, detailed structures of male terminalia, we recognized a total of 144 (109 new and 35 known) species in our sample. Out of them, 83 species representing the supraspecific taxa of <em>Dichaetophora</em>, <em>Mulgravea</em> and <em>Dudaica</em> were selected, along with 33 species from major genera and subgenera of <em>Drosophila</em> in the tribe Drosophilini, as in-group and four species from the tribe Colocasiomyini as out-group for phylogenetic reconstruction based on 12 nuclear gene markers. In the trees constructed by the maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference methods, the three focal taxa (i.e., <em>Dichaetophora</em>, <em>Mulgravea</em> and <em>Dudaica</em>) formed a clade provisionally called the “pan-<em>Dichaetophora</em>”. Within this large clade, the <em>agbo</em>, <em>tenuicauda</em>, <em>sinensis</em> and <em>trilobita</em> groups of <em>Dichaetophora</em>, <em>Mulgravea</em> and <em>Dudaica</em> were recovered as monophyletic groups, but <em>Dichaetophora</em> and its <em>acutissima</em> group were regarded as paraphyletic. In addition, two clusters were recognized among ungrouped species of <em>Dichaetophora</em>. Thus, the present study has uncovered some issues concerning the taxonomy of the pan-<em>Dichaetophora</em>. Such issues will be addressed elsewhere in the phylogenetic reclassification of the pan-<em>Dichaetophora</em>, along with descriptions/redescriptions of a large number of new/known species delimited in the present study.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution\",\"volume\":\"201 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108194\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1055790324001866\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1055790324001866","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Molecular phylogeny and species diversity of the genus Dichaetophora Duda and related taxa (Diptera: Drosophilidae)
Our intensive surveys of wild drosophilids in East and Southeast Asia discovered a great species diversity (more than 100 putatively new species) of the genus Dichaetophora, which is currently comprised of 67 formally described species assigned into five species groups, i.e., agbo, tenuicauda, acutissima, sinensis and trilobita. In the present study, we delimited species from a huge amount of samples of Dichaetophora and allied taxa (the genus Mulgravea and the subgenus Dudaica of Drosophila) collected from a wide range of the Oriental and east Palearctic regions. We first sorted all specimens into morpho-species, and representative specimen(s) selected from each morpho-species were subjected to barcoding of COI (the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I gene) sequences. The applied ASAP (Assemble Species by Automatic Partitioning) analysis estimated a total of 166 to 168 MOTUs (molecular operational taxonomic units). Integrating this result with morphological evidence from re-examined, detailed structures of male terminalia, we recognized a total of 144 (109 new and 35 known) species in our sample. Out of them, 83 species representing the supraspecific taxa of Dichaetophora, Mulgravea and Dudaica were selected, along with 33 species from major genera and subgenera of Drosophila in the tribe Drosophilini, as in-group and four species from the tribe Colocasiomyini as out-group for phylogenetic reconstruction based on 12 nuclear gene markers. In the trees constructed by the maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference methods, the three focal taxa (i.e., Dichaetophora, Mulgravea and Dudaica) formed a clade provisionally called the “pan-Dichaetophora”. Within this large clade, the agbo, tenuicauda, sinensis and trilobita groups of Dichaetophora, Mulgravea and Dudaica were recovered as monophyletic groups, but Dichaetophora and its acutissima group were regarded as paraphyletic. In addition, two clusters were recognized among ungrouped species of Dichaetophora. Thus, the present study has uncovered some issues concerning the taxonomy of the pan-Dichaetophora. Such issues will be addressed elsewhere in the phylogenetic reclassification of the pan-Dichaetophora, along with descriptions/redescriptions of a large number of new/known species delimited in the present study.
期刊介绍:
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution is dedicated to bringing Darwin''s dream within grasp - to "have fairly true genealogical trees of each great kingdom of Nature." The journal provides a forum for molecular studies that advance our understanding of phylogeny and evolution, further the development of phylogenetically more accurate taxonomic classifications, and ultimately bring a unified classification for all the ramifying lines of life. Phylogeographic studies will be considered for publication if they offer EXCEPTIONAL theoretical or empirical advances.