{"title":"美国东南部肌萎缩侧索硬化症的预后因素和流行病学","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2024.07.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess the performance of known survival predictors and evaluate their stratification capability in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).</p></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><p>We analyzed demographic and clinical variables collected at the Mayo Clinic, Florida ALS center during the first clinical visit of 1442 (100%) patients with ALS.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Our cohort had a median (interquartile range [IQR]) age at diagnosis of 64.8 (57-72) years; 1350 (92%) were non-Hispanic White; and 771 (53.5%) were male. The median (IQR) diagnostic delay was 10.1 (6-18) months, body mass index was 25.4 (23-49), and forced vital capacity was 72% (52%-87%). Approximately 12% of patients tested carried a pathologic <em>C9orf72</em> hexanucleotide repeat expansion. Median (IQR) ALS functional rating scale-revised score was 35 (29-40) and ALS cognitive behavioral screen score was 15 (12-17). The median (IQR) survival after diagnosis was 17.2 (9-31) months, and survival from symptom onset was 30 (20-48) months. We found that older age decreased forced vital capacity, and fast-progressing ALS functional rating scale-revised scores significantly (<em>P</em><.0001) influence survival curves and associated hazard risk.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Although results obtained from our cohort are consistent with other reports (eg, men with spinal onset experience a longer survival than women with bulbar onset), they remind us of the complexity of the disease’s natural history and the limited prognostic power of the most common clinical predictors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94132,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542454824000523/pdfft?md5=a5e3c1695eb2a43f63cf5c69f1afb112&pid=1-s2.0-S2542454824000523-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic Factors and Epidemiology of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis in Southeastern United States\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2024.07.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess the performance of known survival predictors and evaluate their stratification capability in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).</p></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><p>We analyzed demographic and clinical variables collected at the Mayo Clinic, Florida ALS center during the first clinical visit of 1442 (100%) patients with ALS.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Our cohort had a median (interquartile range [IQR]) age at diagnosis of 64.8 (57-72) years; 1350 (92%) were non-Hispanic White; and 771 (53.5%) were male. The median (IQR) diagnostic delay was 10.1 (6-18) months, body mass index was 25.4 (23-49), and forced vital capacity was 72% (52%-87%). Approximately 12% of patients tested carried a pathologic <em>C9orf72</em> hexanucleotide repeat expansion. Median (IQR) ALS functional rating scale-revised score was 35 (29-40) and ALS cognitive behavioral screen score was 15 (12-17). The median (IQR) survival after diagnosis was 17.2 (9-31) months, and survival from symptom onset was 30 (20-48) months. We found that older age decreased forced vital capacity, and fast-progressing ALS functional rating scale-revised scores significantly (<em>P</em><.0001) influence survival curves and associated hazard risk.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Although results obtained from our cohort are consistent with other reports (eg, men with spinal onset experience a longer survival than women with bulbar onset), they remind us of the complexity of the disease’s natural history and the limited prognostic power of the most common clinical predictors.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94132,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542454824000523/pdfft?md5=a5e3c1695eb2a43f63cf5c69f1afb112&pid=1-s2.0-S2542454824000523-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542454824000523\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542454824000523","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的评估已知生存预测指标的性能,并评价其对肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)患者的分层能力。患者和方法我们分析了佛罗里达州梅奥诊所 ALS 中心在 1442 名 ALS 患者(100%)首次临床就诊时收集的人口统计学和临床变量。结果我们的队列中诊断时的中位(四分位距 [IQR])年龄为 64.8(57-72)岁;1350 人(92%)为非西班牙裔白人;771 人(53.5%)为男性。诊断延迟的中位数(IQR)为 10.1(6-18)个月,体重指数为 25.4(23-49),用力肺活量为 72%(52%-87%)。约12%的受检患者携带病理性C9orf72六核苷酸重复扩增。ALS 功能评分量表修订版得分的中位数(IQR)为 35(29-40),ALS 认知行为筛查得分的中位数(IQR)为 15(12-17)。确诊后的生存期中位数(IQR)为17.2(9-31)个月,症状出现后的生存期为30(20-48)个月。我们发现,年龄越大,受迫生命体征能力越低,快速进展的 ALS 功能评分量表修订版评分会显著影响生存曲线和相关危险风险(P< .0001)。
Prognostic Factors and Epidemiology of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis in Southeastern United States
Objective
To assess the performance of known survival predictors and evaluate their stratification capability in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).
Patients and Methods
We analyzed demographic and clinical variables collected at the Mayo Clinic, Florida ALS center during the first clinical visit of 1442 (100%) patients with ALS.
Results
Our cohort had a median (interquartile range [IQR]) age at diagnosis of 64.8 (57-72) years; 1350 (92%) were non-Hispanic White; and 771 (53.5%) were male. The median (IQR) diagnostic delay was 10.1 (6-18) months, body mass index was 25.4 (23-49), and forced vital capacity was 72% (52%-87%). Approximately 12% of patients tested carried a pathologic C9orf72 hexanucleotide repeat expansion. Median (IQR) ALS functional rating scale-revised score was 35 (29-40) and ALS cognitive behavioral screen score was 15 (12-17). The median (IQR) survival after diagnosis was 17.2 (9-31) months, and survival from symptom onset was 30 (20-48) months. We found that older age decreased forced vital capacity, and fast-progressing ALS functional rating scale-revised scores significantly (P<.0001) influence survival curves and associated hazard risk.
Conclusion
Although results obtained from our cohort are consistent with other reports (eg, men with spinal onset experience a longer survival than women with bulbar onset), they remind us of the complexity of the disease’s natural history and the limited prognostic power of the most common clinical predictors.