经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)与静脉曲张栓塞术可降低门脉压力梯度超过 12 mmHg 患者的再出血风险:长期随访研究

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Yaowei Bai , Jiacheng Liu , Wenlong Wu , Binqian Zhou , Bo Sun , Wei Yao , Xiaoming Liu , Hu Zhao , Yusheng Guo , Xin Jiang , Bin Liang , Lian Yang , Chuansheng Zheng
{"title":"经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)与静脉曲张栓塞术可降低门脉压力梯度超过 12 mmHg 患者的再出血风险:长期随访研究","authors":"Yaowei Bai ,&nbsp;Jiacheng Liu ,&nbsp;Wenlong Wu ,&nbsp;Binqian Zhou ,&nbsp;Bo Sun ,&nbsp;Wei Yao ,&nbsp;Xiaoming Liu ,&nbsp;Hu Zhao ,&nbsp;Yusheng Guo ,&nbsp;Xin Jiang ,&nbsp;Bin Liang ,&nbsp;Lian Yang ,&nbsp;Chuansheng Zheng","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The consensus on whether Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) should be combined with variceal embolization in the treatment of portal hypertension-induced bleeding has not yet been reached. This study aimed to compare the difference in rebleeding incidence between TIPS and TIPS combined with variceal embolization and to analyze the optimal population for variceal embolization.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Clinical data of 721 patients undergoing TIPS were retrospectively collected. Patients were divided into two groups: TIPS alone (n = 155) and TIPS with embolization (TIPS+E, n = 251). Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves were used to analyze prognostic differences between the two groups, and subgroup analysis was conducted based on post-TIPS portal pressure gradient (PPG) exceeding 12 mmHg.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After TIPS placement, the mean PPG significantly decreased for all patients. A total of 51 patients (12.6 %) experienced rebleeding, with 24 cases (15.9 %) in the TIPS group and 27 cases (10.6 %) in the TIPS+E group. There was no significant difference in cumulative rebleeding incidence between the TIPS+E and TIPS groups. In the subgroup with post-TIPS PPG greater than 12 mmHg, the cumulative rebleeding incidence was significantly lower in the TIPS+E group compared to the TIPS group (HR = 0.47, 95 %CI = 0.24–0.93, Log rank P = 0.026). No significant difference was found in patients with a post-TIPS PPG less than 12 mmHg.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>For patients with post-TIPS PPG exceeding 12 mmHg, simultaneous variceal embolization with TIPS placement significantly reduces the risk of rebleeding.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12063,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) with variceal embolization reduces rebleeding risk for patients with portal pressure gradient over 12 mmHg: A long-term follow-up study\",\"authors\":\"Yaowei Bai ,&nbsp;Jiacheng Liu ,&nbsp;Wenlong Wu ,&nbsp;Binqian Zhou ,&nbsp;Bo Sun ,&nbsp;Wei Yao ,&nbsp;Xiaoming Liu ,&nbsp;Hu Zhao ,&nbsp;Yusheng Guo ,&nbsp;Xin Jiang ,&nbsp;Bin Liang ,&nbsp;Lian Yang ,&nbsp;Chuansheng Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111740\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The consensus on whether Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) should be combined with variceal embolization in the treatment of portal hypertension-induced bleeding has not yet been reached. This study aimed to compare the difference in rebleeding incidence between TIPS and TIPS combined with variceal embolization and to analyze the optimal population for variceal embolization.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Clinical data of 721 patients undergoing TIPS were retrospectively collected. Patients were divided into two groups: TIPS alone (n = 155) and TIPS with embolization (TIPS+E, n = 251). Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves were used to analyze prognostic differences between the two groups, and subgroup analysis was conducted based on post-TIPS portal pressure gradient (PPG) exceeding 12 mmHg.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After TIPS placement, the mean PPG significantly decreased for all patients. A total of 51 patients (12.6 %) experienced rebleeding, with 24 cases (15.9 %) in the TIPS group and 27 cases (10.6 %) in the TIPS+E group. There was no significant difference in cumulative rebleeding incidence between the TIPS+E and TIPS groups. In the subgroup with post-TIPS PPG greater than 12 mmHg, the cumulative rebleeding incidence was significantly lower in the TIPS+E group compared to the TIPS group (HR = 0.47, 95 %CI = 0.24–0.93, Log rank P = 0.026). No significant difference was found in patients with a post-TIPS PPG less than 12 mmHg.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>For patients with post-TIPS PPG exceeding 12 mmHg, simultaneous variceal embolization with TIPS placement significantly reduces the risk of rebleeding.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X2400456X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X2400456X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的关于经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)是否应与静脉曲张栓塞术联合治疗门静脉高压引起的出血,目前尚未达成共识。本研究旨在比较 TIPS 和 TIPS 联合静脉曲张栓塞术在再出血发生率上的差异,并分析静脉曲张栓塞术的最佳适用人群。患者分为两组:方法回顾性收集了 721 名接受 TIPS 的患者的临床数据,将患者分为两组:单纯 TIPS 组(155 人)和 TIPS 加栓塞组(TIPS+E,251 人)。采用 Kaplan-Meier (KM) 曲线分析两组患者的预后差异,并根据 TIPS 术后门静脉压力梯度(PPG)超过 12 mmHg 进行亚组分析。共有 51 例患者(12.6%)出现再出血,其中 TIPS 组 24 例(15.9%),TIPS+E 组 27 例(10.6%)。TIPS+E 组和 TIPS 组的累积再出血发生率没有明显差异。在TIPS后PPG大于12 mmHg的亚组中,TIPS+E组的累积再出血发生率明显低于TIPS组(HR = 0.47, 95 %CI = 0.24-0.93, Log rank P = 0.026)。结论对于 TIPS 后 PPG 超过 12 mmHg 的患者,同时进行静脉曲张栓塞术和 TIPS 置入术可大大降低再出血的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) with variceal embolization reduces rebleeding risk for patients with portal pressure gradient over 12 mmHg: A long-term follow-up study

Objective

The consensus on whether Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) should be combined with variceal embolization in the treatment of portal hypertension-induced bleeding has not yet been reached. This study aimed to compare the difference in rebleeding incidence between TIPS and TIPS combined with variceal embolization and to analyze the optimal population for variceal embolization.

Methods

Clinical data of 721 patients undergoing TIPS were retrospectively collected. Patients were divided into two groups: TIPS alone (n = 155) and TIPS with embolization (TIPS+E, n = 251). Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves were used to analyze prognostic differences between the two groups, and subgroup analysis was conducted based on post-TIPS portal pressure gradient (PPG) exceeding 12 mmHg.

Results

After TIPS placement, the mean PPG significantly decreased for all patients. A total of 51 patients (12.6 %) experienced rebleeding, with 24 cases (15.9 %) in the TIPS group and 27 cases (10.6 %) in the TIPS+E group. There was no significant difference in cumulative rebleeding incidence between the TIPS+E and TIPS groups. In the subgroup with post-TIPS PPG greater than 12 mmHg, the cumulative rebleeding incidence was significantly lower in the TIPS+E group compared to the TIPS group (HR = 0.47, 95 %CI = 0.24–0.93, Log rank P = 0.026). No significant difference was found in patients with a post-TIPS PPG less than 12 mmHg.

Conclusion

For patients with post-TIPS PPG exceeding 12 mmHg, simultaneous variceal embolization with TIPS placement significantly reduces the risk of rebleeding.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.00%
发文量
398
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: European Journal of Radiology is an international journal which aims to communicate to its readers, state-of-the-art information on imaging developments in the form of high quality original research articles and timely reviews on current developments in the field. Its audience includes clinicians at all levels of training including radiology trainees, newly qualified imaging specialists and the experienced radiologist. Its aim is to inform efficient, appropriate and evidence-based imaging practice to the benefit of patients worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信