中国城市房地产中介竞争与房价

Q2 Decision Sciences
Leiju Qiu;Dongmei Guo
{"title":"中国城市房地产中介竞争与房价","authors":"Leiju Qiu;Dongmei Guo","doi":"10.26599/IJCS.2024.9100019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Housing market can be viewed as a big intelligent system which gathers various intelligent agents including the demand side, the supply side, as well as the brokerage. Real estate agents are a large group that can lubricate housing transactions, but due to the principal-agent problem, this housing-transaction intelligent system shows low service efficiency. This paper claims that the non-price competition among real estate agents could possibly reconcile the principal-agent problem. With a merged dataset of housing listings and transaction records in Beijing, we find that the competition in the brokerage market raises housing prices significantly. This provides the first empirical evidence that the non-price competition of real estate agents could reconcile the principal-agent problem. Furthermore, we find that exclusive listing and the agent's effort positively relate to higher housing prices. The impact is even stronger in a hotter market. This paper explores the role of competition in the performance of the housing-transaction intelligent system, and therefore has important theoretical and practical significance for the system.","PeriodicalId":32381,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Crowd Science","volume":"8 4","pages":"205-211"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10681265","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Competition of Real Estate Agents and Housing Prices in Urban China\",\"authors\":\"Leiju Qiu;Dongmei Guo\",\"doi\":\"10.26599/IJCS.2024.9100019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Housing market can be viewed as a big intelligent system which gathers various intelligent agents including the demand side, the supply side, as well as the brokerage. Real estate agents are a large group that can lubricate housing transactions, but due to the principal-agent problem, this housing-transaction intelligent system shows low service efficiency. This paper claims that the non-price competition among real estate agents could possibly reconcile the principal-agent problem. With a merged dataset of housing listings and transaction records in Beijing, we find that the competition in the brokerage market raises housing prices significantly. This provides the first empirical evidence that the non-price competition of real estate agents could reconcile the principal-agent problem. Furthermore, we find that exclusive listing and the agent's effort positively relate to higher housing prices. The impact is even stronger in a hotter market. This paper explores the role of competition in the performance of the housing-transaction intelligent system, and therefore has important theoretical and practical significance for the system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32381,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Crowd Science\",\"volume\":\"8 4\",\"pages\":\"205-211\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10681265\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Crowd Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10681265/\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Decision Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Crowd Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10681265/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Decision Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

住房市场可以看作是一个大的智能系统,它聚集了包括需求方、供应方以及中介在内的各种智能代理。房产中介是一个能够润滑房屋交易的庞大群体,但由于委托代理问题,这一房屋交易智能系统的服务效率较低。本文认为,房产中介之间的非价格竞争有可能调和委托代理问题。通过合并北京的房屋挂牌和交易记录数据集,我们发现经纪市场的竞争显著提高了房价。这首次提供了房地产中介的非价格竞争可以协调委托代理问题的经验证据。此外,我们还发现,独家挂牌和经纪人的努力与房价上涨呈正相关。在市场较热的情况下,这种影响甚至更大。本文探讨了竞争在房屋交易智能系统绩效中的作用,因此对该系统具有重要的理论和实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Competition of Real Estate Agents and Housing Prices in Urban China
Housing market can be viewed as a big intelligent system which gathers various intelligent agents including the demand side, the supply side, as well as the brokerage. Real estate agents are a large group that can lubricate housing transactions, but due to the principal-agent problem, this housing-transaction intelligent system shows low service efficiency. This paper claims that the non-price competition among real estate agents could possibly reconcile the principal-agent problem. With a merged dataset of housing listings and transaction records in Beijing, we find that the competition in the brokerage market raises housing prices significantly. This provides the first empirical evidence that the non-price competition of real estate agents could reconcile the principal-agent problem. Furthermore, we find that exclusive listing and the agent's effort positively relate to higher housing prices. The impact is even stronger in a hotter market. This paper explores the role of competition in the performance of the housing-transaction intelligent system, and therefore has important theoretical and practical significance for the system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Crowd Science
International Journal of Crowd Science Decision Sciences-Decision Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信