法院判决留下了一些有关学生运动员就业地位的未决问题

Timothy O’Brien Esq.
{"title":"法院判决留下了一些有关学生运动员就业地位的未决问题","authors":"Timothy O’Brien Esq.","doi":"10.1002/cala.41447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In a long-awaited decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit issued its ruling in the case of <i>Johnson, et al. v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, et al.</i>, which deals with the employment status of collegiate student-athletes. However, instead of a sweeping decision declaring whether they are or aren’t employees, the Court created a new legal standard by which an assessment of employment status should be made.</p>","PeriodicalId":100209,"journal":{"name":"Campus Legal Advisor","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Court decision leaves some unresolved issues about employment status of student-athletes\",\"authors\":\"Timothy O’Brien Esq.\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cala.41447\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In a long-awaited decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit issued its ruling in the case of <i>Johnson, et al. v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, et al.</i>, which deals with the employment status of collegiate student-athletes. However, instead of a sweeping decision declaring whether they are or aren’t employees, the Court created a new legal standard by which an assessment of employment status should be made.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100209,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Campus Legal Advisor\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Campus Legal Advisor\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cala.41447\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Campus Legal Advisor","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cala.41447","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在一项期待已久的裁决中,美国第三巡回上诉法院就 Johnson 等人诉全国大学生体育协会等人一案做出了裁决,该案涉及大学生运动员的就业状况。然而,法院并没有一锤定音地宣布他们是或不是雇员,而是创立了一个新的法律标准,据此对就业状况进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Court decision leaves some unresolved issues about employment status of student-athletes

In a long-awaited decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit issued its ruling in the case of Johnson, et al. v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, et al., which deals with the employment status of collegiate student-athletes. However, instead of a sweeping decision declaring whether they are or aren’t employees, the Court created a new legal standard by which an assessment of employment status should be made.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信