{"title":"法院判决留下了一些有关学生运动员就业地位的未决问题","authors":"Timothy O’Brien Esq.","doi":"10.1002/cala.41447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In a long-awaited decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit issued its ruling in the case of <i>Johnson, et al. v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, et al.</i>, which deals with the employment status of collegiate student-athletes. However, instead of a sweeping decision declaring whether they are or aren’t employees, the Court created a new legal standard by which an assessment of employment status should be made.</p>","PeriodicalId":100209,"journal":{"name":"Campus Legal Advisor","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Court decision leaves some unresolved issues about employment status of student-athletes\",\"authors\":\"Timothy O’Brien Esq.\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cala.41447\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In a long-awaited decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit issued its ruling in the case of <i>Johnson, et al. v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, et al.</i>, which deals with the employment status of collegiate student-athletes. However, instead of a sweeping decision declaring whether they are or aren’t employees, the Court created a new legal standard by which an assessment of employment status should be made.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100209,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Campus Legal Advisor\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Campus Legal Advisor\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cala.41447\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Campus Legal Advisor","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cala.41447","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在一项期待已久的裁决中,美国第三巡回上诉法院就 Johnson 等人诉全国大学生体育协会等人一案做出了裁决,该案涉及大学生运动员的就业状况。然而,法院并没有一锤定音地宣布他们是或不是雇员,而是创立了一个新的法律标准,据此对就业状况进行评估。
Court decision leaves some unresolved issues about employment status of student-athletes
In a long-awaited decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit issued its ruling in the case of Johnson, et al. v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, et al., which deals with the employment status of collegiate student-athletes. However, instead of a sweeping decision declaring whether they are or aren’t employees, the Court created a new legal standard by which an assessment of employment status should be made.