一项混合方法研究,为加利福尼亚州圣迭戈市预防吸毒过量致死提供信息:吸毒者的观点

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Katie Bailey , Arielle Schecter , William H. Eger , Chad “C.J.” Justin Valasek , Steffanie A. Strathdee , Amy Knox , Alicia Harvey-Vera , Carlos F. Vera , Shira M. Goldenberg , Angela Robertson Bazzi , Peter J. Davidson
{"title":"一项混合方法研究,为加利福尼亚州圣迭戈市预防吸毒过量致死提供信息:吸毒者的观点","authors":"Katie Bailey ,&nbsp;Arielle Schecter ,&nbsp;William H. Eger ,&nbsp;Chad “C.J.” Justin Valasek ,&nbsp;Steffanie A. Strathdee ,&nbsp;Amy Knox ,&nbsp;Alicia Harvey-Vera ,&nbsp;Carlos F. Vera ,&nbsp;Shira M. Goldenberg ,&nbsp;Angela Robertson Bazzi ,&nbsp;Peter J. Davidson","doi":"10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>In the United States, community overdose education and naloxone distribution (OEND) programs have demonstrated efficacy in reducing opioid-related mortality. OEND programs have expanded across San Diego County, California, but differential naloxone accessibility among people who use drugs (PWUD) has not been assessed. We examined factors that shape individual naloxone accessibility in San Diego.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We employed a convergent parallel mixed methods design using surveys (<em>n</em> = 194) and qualitative interviews (<em>n</em> = 20). Ordinal logistic regression examined factors associated with individual naloxone accessibility (i.e., the frequency with which participants could access naloxone within five minutes, categorized as <em>never, sometimes</em>, or <em>always</em>). Qualitative interviews explored participant perceptions of naloxone accessibility and whether and how they maintained naloxone. We organized multilevel findings into a modified social-ecological model.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In quantitative and qualitative samples, participants were majority male (72 % and 70 % respectively), non-White race/ethnicity (55 % and 75 %), with an average age around 42 years. In the quantitative sample, 24 % never had personally accessible naloxone, 52 % sometimes did, and 24 % always did. Factors independently associated with individual naloxone accessibility were female gender (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AdjOR]: 2.51, 95 % Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.31–4.85), monthly income &lt;$500 (AdjOR: 0.42, 95 %CI:0.19, 0.90), witnessing an overdose (AdjOR: 3.51, 95 %CI:1.67–7.55), and knowing where to get free naloxone (AdjOR: 3.44, 95 %CI: 1.79–6.75). Qualitative data suggested that naloxone was generally easy to acquire in San Diego due to community harm reduction outreach and mutual aid among peers, albeit community barriers including distance to harm reduction providers and frequent relocation/displacement for those experiencing homelessness. Individual attitudes toward overdose risk, naloxone, and community responsibility contributed to varied individual naloxone accessibility.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study highlights multilevel factors influencing individual naloxone accessibility among people who use drugs in San Diego, emphasizing the importance of harm reduction outreach and peer-to-peer support. We identified opportunities for interventions that address both individual attitudes and community-level barriers to improve naloxone accessibility.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48364,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Drug Policy","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 104577"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A mixed methods study to inform fatal overdose prevention in San Diego, California: Perspectives from people who use drugs\",\"authors\":\"Katie Bailey ,&nbsp;Arielle Schecter ,&nbsp;William H. Eger ,&nbsp;Chad “C.J.” Justin Valasek ,&nbsp;Steffanie A. Strathdee ,&nbsp;Amy Knox ,&nbsp;Alicia Harvey-Vera ,&nbsp;Carlos F. Vera ,&nbsp;Shira M. Goldenberg ,&nbsp;Angela Robertson Bazzi ,&nbsp;Peter J. Davidson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104577\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>In the United States, community overdose education and naloxone distribution (OEND) programs have demonstrated efficacy in reducing opioid-related mortality. OEND programs have expanded across San Diego County, California, but differential naloxone accessibility among people who use drugs (PWUD) has not been assessed. We examined factors that shape individual naloxone accessibility in San Diego.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We employed a convergent parallel mixed methods design using surveys (<em>n</em> = 194) and qualitative interviews (<em>n</em> = 20). Ordinal logistic regression examined factors associated with individual naloxone accessibility (i.e., the frequency with which participants could access naloxone within five minutes, categorized as <em>never, sometimes</em>, or <em>always</em>). Qualitative interviews explored participant perceptions of naloxone accessibility and whether and how they maintained naloxone. We organized multilevel findings into a modified social-ecological model.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In quantitative and qualitative samples, participants were majority male (72 % and 70 % respectively), non-White race/ethnicity (55 % and 75 %), with an average age around 42 years. In the quantitative sample, 24 % never had personally accessible naloxone, 52 % sometimes did, and 24 % always did. Factors independently associated with individual naloxone accessibility were female gender (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AdjOR]: 2.51, 95 % Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.31–4.85), monthly income &lt;$500 (AdjOR: 0.42, 95 %CI:0.19, 0.90), witnessing an overdose (AdjOR: 3.51, 95 %CI:1.67–7.55), and knowing where to get free naloxone (AdjOR: 3.44, 95 %CI: 1.79–6.75). Qualitative data suggested that naloxone was generally easy to acquire in San Diego due to community harm reduction outreach and mutual aid among peers, albeit community barriers including distance to harm reduction providers and frequent relocation/displacement for those experiencing homelessness. Individual attitudes toward overdose risk, naloxone, and community responsibility contributed to varied individual naloxone accessibility.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study highlights multilevel factors influencing individual naloxone accessibility among people who use drugs in San Diego, emphasizing the importance of harm reduction outreach and peer-to-peer support. We identified opportunities for interventions that address both individual attitudes and community-level barriers to improve naloxone accessibility.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Drug Policy\",\"volume\":\"133 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104577\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Drug Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955395924002615\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Drug Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955395924002615","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景在美国,社区用药过量教育和纳洛酮发放 (OEND) 计划在降低与阿片类药物相关的死亡率方面已取得成效。社区用药过量教育和纳洛酮发放计划已在加利福尼亚州圣迭戈县得到推广,但尚未对吸毒者(PWUD)中纳洛酮的可及性差异进行评估。我们研究了影响圣迭戈个人纳洛酮可及性的因素。方法我们采用了收敛平行混合方法设计,使用了调查(n = 194)和定性访谈(n = 20)。序数逻辑回归研究了与个人纳洛酮可及性相关的因素(即参与者在五分钟内获得纳洛酮的频率,分为从不、有时或总是)。定性访谈探讨了参与者对纳洛酮可及性的看法,以及他们是否和如何保持纳洛酮。结果在定量和定性样本中,参与者大多为男性(分别占 72% 和 70%)、非白人种族/族裔(分别占 55% 和 75%),平均年龄约为 42 岁。在定量样本中,24% 的参与者从未亲自使用过纳洛酮,52% 的参与者有时使用,24% 的参与者总是使用。与个人获得纳洛酮的可能性独立相关的因素有女性性别(调整比值比 [AdjOR]:2.51,95% 置信区间 [CI]:1.31-4.85)、月收入<.85)、月收入<500 美元(AdjOR:0.42,95 %CI:0.19,0.90)、目睹用药过量(AdjOR:3.51,95 %CI:1.67-7.55)以及知道在哪里可以获得免费纳洛酮(AdjOR:3.44,95 %CI:1.79-6.75)。定性数据表明,在圣地亚哥,由于社区减低伤害宣传和同龄人之间的互助,纳洛酮通常很容易获得,尽管社区存在一些障碍,包括距离减低伤害提供者较远,以及无家可归者经常搬迁/迁移。个人对用药过量风险、纳洛酮和社区责任的态度导致了个人纳洛酮获得性的不同。结论这项研究强调了影响圣地亚哥吸毒者个人纳洛酮获得性的多层次因素,强调了减低伤害宣传和同伴互助的重要性。我们发现了针对个人态度和社区层面的障碍进行干预的机会,以改善纳洛酮的可及性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A mixed methods study to inform fatal overdose prevention in San Diego, California: Perspectives from people who use drugs

Background

In the United States, community overdose education and naloxone distribution (OEND) programs have demonstrated efficacy in reducing opioid-related mortality. OEND programs have expanded across San Diego County, California, but differential naloxone accessibility among people who use drugs (PWUD) has not been assessed. We examined factors that shape individual naloxone accessibility in San Diego.

Methods

We employed a convergent parallel mixed methods design using surveys (n = 194) and qualitative interviews (n = 20). Ordinal logistic regression examined factors associated with individual naloxone accessibility (i.e., the frequency with which participants could access naloxone within five minutes, categorized as never, sometimes, or always). Qualitative interviews explored participant perceptions of naloxone accessibility and whether and how they maintained naloxone. We organized multilevel findings into a modified social-ecological model.

Results

In quantitative and qualitative samples, participants were majority male (72 % and 70 % respectively), non-White race/ethnicity (55 % and 75 %), with an average age around 42 years. In the quantitative sample, 24 % never had personally accessible naloxone, 52 % sometimes did, and 24 % always did. Factors independently associated with individual naloxone accessibility were female gender (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AdjOR]: 2.51, 95 % Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.31–4.85), monthly income <$500 (AdjOR: 0.42, 95 %CI:0.19, 0.90), witnessing an overdose (AdjOR: 3.51, 95 %CI:1.67–7.55), and knowing where to get free naloxone (AdjOR: 3.44, 95 %CI: 1.79–6.75). Qualitative data suggested that naloxone was generally easy to acquire in San Diego due to community harm reduction outreach and mutual aid among peers, albeit community barriers including distance to harm reduction providers and frequent relocation/displacement for those experiencing homelessness. Individual attitudes toward overdose risk, naloxone, and community responsibility contributed to varied individual naloxone accessibility.

Conclusions

This study highlights multilevel factors influencing individual naloxone accessibility among people who use drugs in San Diego, emphasizing the importance of harm reduction outreach and peer-to-peer support. We identified opportunities for interventions that address both individual attitudes and community-level barriers to improve naloxone accessibility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.40%
发文量
307
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Drug Policy provides a forum for the dissemination of current research, reviews, debate, and critical analysis on drug use and drug policy in a global context. It seeks to publish material on the social, political, legal, and health contexts of psychoactive substance use, both licit and illicit. The journal is particularly concerned to explore the effects of drug policy and practice on drug-using behaviour and its health and social consequences. It is the policy of the journal to represent a wide range of material on drug-related matters from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信