Katia Khoury, Jane L. Meisel, Christina Yau, Hope S. Rugo, Rita Nanda, Marie Davidian, Butch Tsiatis, A. Jo Chien, Anne M. Wallace, Mili Arora, Mariya Rozenblit, Dawn L. Hershman, Alexandra Zimmer, Amy S. Clark, Heather Beckwith, Anthony D. Elias, Erica Stringer-Reasor, Judy C. Boughey, Chaitali Nangia, Christos Vaklavas, Coral Omene, Kathy S. Albain, Kevin M. Kalinsky, Claudine Isaacs, Jennifer Tseng, Evanthia T. Roussos Torres, Brittani Thomas, Alexandra Thomas, Amy Sanford, Ronald Balassanian, Cheryl Ewing, Kay Yeung, Candice Sauder, Tara Sanft, Lajos Pusztai, Meghna S. Trivedi, Ashton Outhaythip, Wen Li, Natsuko Onishi, Adam L. Asare, Philip Beineke, Peter Norwood, Lamorna Brown-Swigart, Gillian L. Hirst, Jeffrey B. Matthews, Brian Moore, W. Fraser Symmans, Elissa Price, Carolyn Beedle, Jane Perlmutter, Paula Pohlmann, Rebecca A. Shatsky, Angela DeMichele, Douglas Yee, Laura J. van ‘t Veer, Nola M. Hylton, Laura J. Esserman
{"title":"在早期乳腺癌中使用达托帕单抗-德鲁司坦:顺序多重分配随机I-SPY2.2第二阶段试验","authors":"Katia Khoury, Jane L. Meisel, Christina Yau, Hope S. Rugo, Rita Nanda, Marie Davidian, Butch Tsiatis, A. Jo Chien, Anne M. Wallace, Mili Arora, Mariya Rozenblit, Dawn L. Hershman, Alexandra Zimmer, Amy S. Clark, Heather Beckwith, Anthony D. Elias, Erica Stringer-Reasor, Judy C. Boughey, Chaitali Nangia, Christos Vaklavas, Coral Omene, Kathy S. Albain, Kevin M. Kalinsky, Claudine Isaacs, Jennifer Tseng, Evanthia T. Roussos Torres, Brittani Thomas, Alexandra Thomas, Amy Sanford, Ronald Balassanian, Cheryl Ewing, Kay Yeung, Candice Sauder, Tara Sanft, Lajos Pusztai, Meghna S. Trivedi, Ashton Outhaythip, Wen Li, Natsuko Onishi, Adam L. Asare, Philip Beineke, Peter Norwood, Lamorna Brown-Swigart, Gillian L. Hirst, Jeffrey B. Matthews, Brian Moore, W. Fraser Symmans, Elissa Price, Carolyn Beedle, Jane Perlmutter, Paula Pohlmann, Rebecca A. Shatsky, Angela DeMichele, Douglas Yee, Laura J. van ‘t Veer, Nola M. Hylton, Laura J. Esserman","doi":"10.1038/s41591-024-03266-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Among the goals of patient-centric care are the advancement of effective personalized treatment, while minimizing toxicity. The phase 2 I-SPY2.2 trial uses a neoadjuvant sequential therapy approach in breast cancer to further these goals, testing promising new agents while optimizing individual outcomes. Here we tested datopotamab–deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) in the I-SPY2.2 trial for patients with high-risk stage 2/3 breast cancer. I-SPY2.2 uses a sequential multiple assignment randomization trial design that includes three sequential blocks of biologically targeted neoadjuvant treatment: the experimental agent(s) (block A), a taxane-based regimen tailored to the tumor subtype (block B) and doxorubicin–cyclophosphamide (block C). Patients are randomized into arms consisting of different investigational block A treatments. Algorithms based on magnetic resonance imaging and core biopsy guide treatment redirection after each block, including the option of early surgical resection in patients predicted to have a high likelihood of pathological complete response, the primary endpoint. There are two primary efficacy analyses: after block A and across all blocks for the six prespecified breast cancer subtypes (defined by clinical hormone receptor/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status and/or the response-predictive subtypes). We report results of 103 patients treated with Dato-DXd. While Dato-DXd did not meet the prespecified threshold for success (graduation) after block A in any subtype, the treatment strategy across all blocks graduated in the hormone receptor-negative HER2<sup>−</sup>Immune<sup>−</sup>DNA repair deficiency<sup>−</sup> subtype with an estimated pathological complete response rate of 41%. No new toxicities were observed, with stomatitis and ocular events occurring at low grades. Dato-DXd was particularly active in the hormone receptor-negative/HER2<sup>−</sup>Immune<sup>−</sup>DNA repair deficiency<sup>−</sup> signature, warranting further investigation, and was safe in other subtypes in patients who followed the treatment strategy. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT01042379.</p>","PeriodicalId":58,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Physical Chemistry ","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7810,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Datopotamab–deruxtecan in early-stage breast cancer: the sequential multiple assignment randomized I-SPY2.2 phase 2 trial\",\"authors\":\"Katia Khoury, Jane L. Meisel, Christina Yau, Hope S. Rugo, Rita Nanda, Marie Davidian, Butch Tsiatis, A. Jo Chien, Anne M. Wallace, Mili Arora, Mariya Rozenblit, Dawn L. Hershman, Alexandra Zimmer, Amy S. Clark, Heather Beckwith, Anthony D. Elias, Erica Stringer-Reasor, Judy C. Boughey, Chaitali Nangia, Christos Vaklavas, Coral Omene, Kathy S. Albain, Kevin M. Kalinsky, Claudine Isaacs, Jennifer Tseng, Evanthia T. Roussos Torres, Brittani Thomas, Alexandra Thomas, Amy Sanford, Ronald Balassanian, Cheryl Ewing, Kay Yeung, Candice Sauder, Tara Sanft, Lajos Pusztai, Meghna S. Trivedi, Ashton Outhaythip, Wen Li, Natsuko Onishi, Adam L. Asare, Philip Beineke, Peter Norwood, Lamorna Brown-Swigart, Gillian L. Hirst, Jeffrey B. Matthews, Brian Moore, W. Fraser Symmans, Elissa Price, Carolyn Beedle, Jane Perlmutter, Paula Pohlmann, Rebecca A. Shatsky, Angela DeMichele, Douglas Yee, Laura J. van ‘t Veer, Nola M. Hylton, Laura J. Esserman\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41591-024-03266-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Among the goals of patient-centric care are the advancement of effective personalized treatment, while minimizing toxicity. The phase 2 I-SPY2.2 trial uses a neoadjuvant sequential therapy approach in breast cancer to further these goals, testing promising new agents while optimizing individual outcomes. Here we tested datopotamab–deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) in the I-SPY2.2 trial for patients with high-risk stage 2/3 breast cancer. I-SPY2.2 uses a sequential multiple assignment randomization trial design that includes three sequential blocks of biologically targeted neoadjuvant treatment: the experimental agent(s) (block A), a taxane-based regimen tailored to the tumor subtype (block B) and doxorubicin–cyclophosphamide (block C). Patients are randomized into arms consisting of different investigational block A treatments. Algorithms based on magnetic resonance imaging and core biopsy guide treatment redirection after each block, including the option of early surgical resection in patients predicted to have a high likelihood of pathological complete response, the primary endpoint. There are two primary efficacy analyses: after block A and across all blocks for the six prespecified breast cancer subtypes (defined by clinical hormone receptor/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status and/or the response-predictive subtypes). We report results of 103 patients treated with Dato-DXd. While Dato-DXd did not meet the prespecified threshold for success (graduation) after block A in any subtype, the treatment strategy across all blocks graduated in the hormone receptor-negative HER2<sup>−</sup>Immune<sup>−</sup>DNA repair deficiency<sup>−</sup> subtype with an estimated pathological complete response rate of 41%. No new toxicities were observed, with stomatitis and ocular events occurring at low grades. Dato-DXd was particularly active in the hormone receptor-negative/HER2<sup>−</sup>Immune<sup>−</sup>DNA repair deficiency<sup>−</sup> signature, warranting further investigation, and was safe in other subtypes in patients who followed the treatment strategy. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT01042379.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":58,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Physical Chemistry \",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7810,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Physical Chemistry \",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-024-03266-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Physical Chemistry ","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-024-03266-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Datopotamab–deruxtecan in early-stage breast cancer: the sequential multiple assignment randomized I-SPY2.2 phase 2 trial
Among the goals of patient-centric care are the advancement of effective personalized treatment, while minimizing toxicity. The phase 2 I-SPY2.2 trial uses a neoadjuvant sequential therapy approach in breast cancer to further these goals, testing promising new agents while optimizing individual outcomes. Here we tested datopotamab–deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) in the I-SPY2.2 trial for patients with high-risk stage 2/3 breast cancer. I-SPY2.2 uses a sequential multiple assignment randomization trial design that includes three sequential blocks of biologically targeted neoadjuvant treatment: the experimental agent(s) (block A), a taxane-based regimen tailored to the tumor subtype (block B) and doxorubicin–cyclophosphamide (block C). Patients are randomized into arms consisting of different investigational block A treatments. Algorithms based on magnetic resonance imaging and core biopsy guide treatment redirection after each block, including the option of early surgical resection in patients predicted to have a high likelihood of pathological complete response, the primary endpoint. There are two primary efficacy analyses: after block A and across all blocks for the six prespecified breast cancer subtypes (defined by clinical hormone receptor/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status and/or the response-predictive subtypes). We report results of 103 patients treated with Dato-DXd. While Dato-DXd did not meet the prespecified threshold for success (graduation) after block A in any subtype, the treatment strategy across all blocks graduated in the hormone receptor-negative HER2−Immune−DNA repair deficiency− subtype with an estimated pathological complete response rate of 41%. No new toxicities were observed, with stomatitis and ocular events occurring at low grades. Dato-DXd was particularly active in the hormone receptor-negative/HER2−Immune−DNA repair deficiency− signature, warranting further investigation, and was safe in other subtypes in patients who followed the treatment strategy. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT01042379.