评估院前护理点脑电图的可行性:院前实施快速脑电图(PHIRE)研究

IF 1.6 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Elan L. Guterman MD, MAS, Mary P. Mercer MD, MPH, Andrew J. Wood MPH, Edilberto Amorim MD, Jonathan K. Kleen MD, PhD, Daniel Gerard MS, NRP, Colleen Kellison EMT-P, Scott Yamashita BA, Benjamin Auerbach, Nikita Joshi MD, Karl A. Sporer MD
{"title":"评估院前护理点脑电图的可行性:院前实施快速脑电图(PHIRE)研究","authors":"Elan L. Guterman MD, MAS,&nbsp;Mary P. Mercer MD, MPH,&nbsp;Andrew J. Wood MPH,&nbsp;Edilberto Amorim MD,&nbsp;Jonathan K. Kleen MD, PhD,&nbsp;Daniel Gerard MS, NRP,&nbsp;Colleen Kellison EMT-P,&nbsp;Scott Yamashita BA,&nbsp;Benjamin Auerbach,&nbsp;Nikita Joshi MD,&nbsp;Karl A. Sporer MD","doi":"10.1002/emp2.13303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Point-of-care electroencephalography (EEG) devices can be rapidly applied and do not require specialized technologists, creating new opportunities to use EEG during prehospital care. We evaluated the feasibility of point-of-care EEG during ambulance transport for 911 calls.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This mixed-methods study was conducted between May 28, 2022 and October 28, 2023. Emergency Medical Services (EMS) clinicians identified eligible individuals, provided emergent treatment, applied EEG, and obtained an EEG recording during ambulance transport. Eligible patients were aged 6 years or older and evaluated for seizure, stroke, or altered mental status. EMS clinicians completed a survey and a brief phone interview following every enrollment. Two epileptologists reviewed EEG recordings for interpretability and artifact.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>There were 34 prehospital encounters in which EEG was applied. Patients had a mean age of 69 years, and 15 (44%) were female. EEG recordings had a median duration of 10 min 30 s. It took EMS clinicians an average of 2.5 min to apply the device and begin EEG recording. There were 14 (47%) recordings where clinicians achieved a high-quality connection for all 10 electrodes and 32 (94%) recordings that were sufficient in quality to interpret. There were 24 (71%) recordings with six or more channels free of artifact for 5 min or more. All clinicians agreed or strongly agreed that the device was easy to use.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Among real-world prehospital encounters for patients with neurologic symptoms, point-of-care EEG was rapidly applied and yielded EEG recordings that could be used for clinical interpretation, demonstrating the feasibility of point-of-care EEG in future prehospital care.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":73967,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/emp2.13303","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the feasibility of prehospital point-of-care EEG: The prehospital implementation of rapid EEG (PHIRE) study\",\"authors\":\"Elan L. Guterman MD, MAS,&nbsp;Mary P. Mercer MD, MPH,&nbsp;Andrew J. Wood MPH,&nbsp;Edilberto Amorim MD,&nbsp;Jonathan K. Kleen MD, PhD,&nbsp;Daniel Gerard MS, NRP,&nbsp;Colleen Kellison EMT-P,&nbsp;Scott Yamashita BA,&nbsp;Benjamin Auerbach,&nbsp;Nikita Joshi MD,&nbsp;Karl A. Sporer MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/emp2.13303\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Point-of-care electroencephalography (EEG) devices can be rapidly applied and do not require specialized technologists, creating new opportunities to use EEG during prehospital care. We evaluated the feasibility of point-of-care EEG during ambulance transport for 911 calls.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This mixed-methods study was conducted between May 28, 2022 and October 28, 2023. Emergency Medical Services (EMS) clinicians identified eligible individuals, provided emergent treatment, applied EEG, and obtained an EEG recording during ambulance transport. Eligible patients were aged 6 years or older and evaluated for seizure, stroke, or altered mental status. EMS clinicians completed a survey and a brief phone interview following every enrollment. Two epileptologists reviewed EEG recordings for interpretability and artifact.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>There were 34 prehospital encounters in which EEG was applied. Patients had a mean age of 69 years, and 15 (44%) were female. EEG recordings had a median duration of 10 min 30 s. It took EMS clinicians an average of 2.5 min to apply the device and begin EEG recording. There were 14 (47%) recordings where clinicians achieved a high-quality connection for all 10 electrodes and 32 (94%) recordings that were sufficient in quality to interpret. There were 24 (71%) recordings with six or more channels free of artifact for 5 min or more. All clinicians agreed or strongly agreed that the device was easy to use.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Among real-world prehospital encounters for patients with neurologic symptoms, point-of-care EEG was rapidly applied and yielded EEG recordings that could be used for clinical interpretation, demonstrating the feasibility of point-of-care EEG in future prehospital care.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73967,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/emp2.13303\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/emp2.13303\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/emp2.13303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 护理点脑电图(EEG)设备可以快速应用,不需要专业技术人员,这为在院前护理中使用脑电图创造了新的机会。我们评估了在救护车运送 911 求救者的过程中使用护理点脑电图的可行性。 方法 这项混合方法研究在 2022 年 5 月 28 日至 2023 年 10 月 28 日期间进行。急诊医疗服务(EMS)临床医生确定符合条件的患者,提供紧急治疗,应用脑电图,并在救护车运送过程中获取脑电图记录。符合条件的患者年龄在 6 岁或以上,并接受过癫痫发作、中风或精神状态改变的评估。急救临床医生在每次登记后都会填写一份调查问卷并进行简短的电话访谈。两名癫痫专家审查了脑电图记录的可解释性和伪影。 结果 共有 34 次院前会诊使用了脑电图。患者的平均年龄为 69 岁,其中 15 人(44%)为女性。脑电图记录的中位持续时间为 10 分 30 秒。急救临床医生平均需要 2.5 分钟来使用设备并开始脑电图记录。临床医生在 14 次(47%)记录中实现了所有 10 个电极的高质量连接,32 次(94%)记录的质量足以进行判读。在 24 次(71%)记录中,有 6 个或更多通道在 5 分钟或更长时间内没有出现伪影。所有临床医生都同意或非常同意该设备易于使用。 结论 在真实世界的院前遇到有神经症状的患者时,可快速应用护理点脑电图,并获得可用于临床解读的脑电图记录,这证明了护理点脑电图在未来院前护理中的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluating the feasibility of prehospital point-of-care EEG: The prehospital implementation of rapid EEG (PHIRE) study

Evaluating the feasibility of prehospital point-of-care EEG: The prehospital implementation of rapid EEG (PHIRE) study

Background

Point-of-care electroencephalography (EEG) devices can be rapidly applied and do not require specialized technologists, creating new opportunities to use EEG during prehospital care. We evaluated the feasibility of point-of-care EEG during ambulance transport for 911 calls.

Methods

This mixed-methods study was conducted between May 28, 2022 and October 28, 2023. Emergency Medical Services (EMS) clinicians identified eligible individuals, provided emergent treatment, applied EEG, and obtained an EEG recording during ambulance transport. Eligible patients were aged 6 years or older and evaluated for seizure, stroke, or altered mental status. EMS clinicians completed a survey and a brief phone interview following every enrollment. Two epileptologists reviewed EEG recordings for interpretability and artifact.

Results

There were 34 prehospital encounters in which EEG was applied. Patients had a mean age of 69 years, and 15 (44%) were female. EEG recordings had a median duration of 10 min 30 s. It took EMS clinicians an average of 2.5 min to apply the device and begin EEG recording. There were 14 (47%) recordings where clinicians achieved a high-quality connection for all 10 electrodes and 32 (94%) recordings that were sufficient in quality to interpret. There were 24 (71%) recordings with six or more channels free of artifact for 5 min or more. All clinicians agreed or strongly agreed that the device was easy to use.

Conclusion

Among real-world prehospital encounters for patients with neurologic symptoms, point-of-care EEG was rapidly applied and yielded EEG recordings that could be used for clinical interpretation, demonstrating the feasibility of point-of-care EEG in future prehospital care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信