早期矫饰调查 (EPS):由家长报告的可靠的 4 至 47 个月大儿童假装类型发展测量方法

IF 1.8 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
{"title":"早期矫饰调查 (EPS):由家长报告的可靠的 4 至 47 个月大儿童假装类型发展测量方法","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cogdev.2024.101483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We present a new 18-item parent-report measure of pretense development for 4- to 47-month-olds: the Early Pretending Survey (EPS). Study 1 (<em>N</em> = 231) demonstrated good internal reliability, and a strongly correlated 2-factor structure for 4- to 47-month-olds. Study 2 (<em>N</em> = 587) also showed good internal reliability, and found the two factors loaded onto a latent second-order Pretend Play factor. Study 3 (<em>N</em> = 84) found the EPS correlated with a researcher-led pretense experiment, however it no longer correlated when controlling for age. Additional analyses using subsamples of parents from Studies 2 and 3 showed good inter-observer reliability between parents (<em>N</em> = 29), and good longitudinal stability after 6 months (<em>N</em> = 196). Additional analyses combining Study 1–3 participants (<em>N</em> ≤ 902) found no item functioning differences across demographic variables, including child age, country, and socio-economic factors. Children’s EPS scores increased as they aged; girls had higher scores than boys; and children of younger parents had higher scores. Finally, we examined the age patterns of each EPS item, demonstrating when 25 %, 50 %, and 75 % of children were predicted to pass each pretense type. The EPS is useful for researchers to better understand how pretending relates to other areas of development (e.g., cognition, language). The EPS could also help parents, early years educators, and children’s media professionals decide which pretense types to use with children of different ages.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51422,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885201424000686/pdfft?md5=a582122df9afb9bf76fb6371ed519e57&pid=1-s2.0-S0885201424000686-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Early Pretending Survey (EPS): A reliable parent-report measure of pretense type development for 4- to 47-month-olds\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cogdev.2024.101483\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We present a new 18-item parent-report measure of pretense development for 4- to 47-month-olds: the Early Pretending Survey (EPS). Study 1 (<em>N</em> = 231) demonstrated good internal reliability, and a strongly correlated 2-factor structure for 4- to 47-month-olds. Study 2 (<em>N</em> = 587) also showed good internal reliability, and found the two factors loaded onto a latent second-order Pretend Play factor. Study 3 (<em>N</em> = 84) found the EPS correlated with a researcher-led pretense experiment, however it no longer correlated when controlling for age. Additional analyses using subsamples of parents from Studies 2 and 3 showed good inter-observer reliability between parents (<em>N</em> = 29), and good longitudinal stability after 6 months (<em>N</em> = 196). Additional analyses combining Study 1–3 participants (<em>N</em> ≤ 902) found no item functioning differences across demographic variables, including child age, country, and socio-economic factors. Children’s EPS scores increased as they aged; girls had higher scores than boys; and children of younger parents had higher scores. Finally, we examined the age patterns of each EPS item, demonstrating when 25 %, 50 %, and 75 % of children were predicted to pass each pretense type. The EPS is useful for researchers to better understand how pretending relates to other areas of development (e.g., cognition, language). The EPS could also help parents, early years educators, and children’s media professionals decide which pretense types to use with children of different ages.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive Development\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885201424000686/pdfft?md5=a582122df9afb9bf76fb6371ed519e57&pid=1-s2.0-S0885201424000686-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885201424000686\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885201424000686","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们为 4 至 47 个月大的幼儿设计了一种新的 18 个项目的家长报告型矫饰发展测量方法:早期矫饰调查(EPS)。研究 1(N = 231)显示了良好的内部可靠性,以及针对 4 至 47 个月大儿童的强相关 2 因子结构。研究 2(样本数=587)也显示出良好的内部可靠性,并发现这两个因子负载于一个潜在的二阶假装游戏因子。研究 3(样本数=84)发现,EPS 与研究者主导的假装游戏实验相关,但在控制年龄后,EPS 与年龄不再相关。使用研究 2 和研究 3 中的家长子样本进行的其他分析表明,家长之间的观察者间可靠性良好(N = 29),6 个月后的纵向稳定性良好(N = 196)。结合研究 1-3 的参与者(N ≤ 902)进行的其他分析发现,不同人口统计学变量(包括儿童年龄、国家和社会经济因素)之间没有项目功能差异。儿童的 EPS 分数随着年龄的增长而增加;女孩的分数高于男孩;父母较年轻的儿童分数较高。最后,我们研究了 EPS 各项目的年龄模式,显示了 25%、50% 和 75% 的儿童通过每种矫饰类型的预测时间。EPS 有助于研究人员更好地了解假装与其他发育领域(如认知、语言)的关系。EPS 还可以帮助家长、幼儿教育工作者和儿童媒体专业人员决定对不同年龄的儿童使用哪种假装类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Early Pretending Survey (EPS): A reliable parent-report measure of pretense type development for 4- to 47-month-olds

We present a new 18-item parent-report measure of pretense development for 4- to 47-month-olds: the Early Pretending Survey (EPS). Study 1 (N = 231) demonstrated good internal reliability, and a strongly correlated 2-factor structure for 4- to 47-month-olds. Study 2 (N = 587) also showed good internal reliability, and found the two factors loaded onto a latent second-order Pretend Play factor. Study 3 (N = 84) found the EPS correlated with a researcher-led pretense experiment, however it no longer correlated when controlling for age. Additional analyses using subsamples of parents from Studies 2 and 3 showed good inter-observer reliability between parents (N = 29), and good longitudinal stability after 6 months (N = 196). Additional analyses combining Study 1–3 participants (N ≤ 902) found no item functioning differences across demographic variables, including child age, country, and socio-economic factors. Children’s EPS scores increased as they aged; girls had higher scores than boys; and children of younger parents had higher scores. Finally, we examined the age patterns of each EPS item, demonstrating when 25 %, 50 %, and 75 % of children were predicted to pass each pretense type. The EPS is useful for researchers to better understand how pretending relates to other areas of development (e.g., cognition, language). The EPS could also help parents, early years educators, and children’s media professionals decide which pretense types to use with children of different ages.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: Cognitive Development contains the very best empirical and theoretical work on the development of perception, memory, language, concepts, thinking, problem solving, metacognition, and social cognition. Criteria for acceptance of articles will be: significance of the work to issues of current interest, substance of the argument, and clarity of expression. For purposes of publication in Cognitive Development, moral and social development will be considered part of cognitive development when they are related to the development of knowledge or thought processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信