立体定向放射外科治疗药物难治性非局限性癫痫:基于病例的放射外科协会(RSS)实践回顾

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
{"title":"立体定向放射外科治疗药物难治性非局限性癫痫:基于病例的放射外科协会(RSS)实践回顾","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Medically refractory epilepsy (MRE) occurs in about 30 % of patients with epilepsy, and the treatment options available to them have evolved over time. The classic treatment for medial temporal lobe epilepsy (mTLE) is anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL), but an initiative to find less invasive options has resulted in treatments such as neuromodulation, ablative procedures, and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). SRS has been an appealing non-invasive option and has developed an increasing presence in the literature over the last few decades. This article provides an overview of SRS for MRE with two example cases, and we discuss the optimal technique as well as the advantages, alternatives, and risks of this therapeutic option.</p></div><div><h3>Cases</h3><p>We present two example cases of patients with MRE, who were poor candidates for invasive surgical treatment options and underwent SRS. The first case is a 65-year-old female with multiple medical comorbidities, whose seizure focus was localized to the left temporal lobe, and the second case is a 19-year-old male with Protein C deficiency and medial temporal lobe sclerosis. Both patients underwent SRS to targets within the medial temporal lobe, and both achieve significant improvements in seizure frequency and severity.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>SRS has generally been shown to be inferior to ATL for seizure reduction in medically refractory mTLE. However, there are patients with epilepsy for which SRS can be considered, such as patients with medical comorbidities that make surgery high risk, patients with epileptogenic foci in eloquent cortex, patients who have failed to respond to surgical management, patients who choose not to undergo surgery, and patients with geographic constraints to epilepsy centers. Patients and their physicians should be aware that SRS is not risk-free. Patients should be counseled on the latency period and monitored for risks such as delayed cerebral edema, visual field deficits, and radiation necrosis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10385,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stereotactic radiosurgery for medically refractory non-lesional epilepsy: A case-based Radiosurgery Society (RSS) practice review\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108550\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Medically refractory epilepsy (MRE) occurs in about 30 % of patients with epilepsy, and the treatment options available to them have evolved over time. The classic treatment for medial temporal lobe epilepsy (mTLE) is anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL), but an initiative to find less invasive options has resulted in treatments such as neuromodulation, ablative procedures, and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). SRS has been an appealing non-invasive option and has developed an increasing presence in the literature over the last few decades. This article provides an overview of SRS for MRE with two example cases, and we discuss the optimal technique as well as the advantages, alternatives, and risks of this therapeutic option.</p></div><div><h3>Cases</h3><p>We present two example cases of patients with MRE, who were poor candidates for invasive surgical treatment options and underwent SRS. The first case is a 65-year-old female with multiple medical comorbidities, whose seizure focus was localized to the left temporal lobe, and the second case is a 19-year-old male with Protein C deficiency and medial temporal lobe sclerosis. Both patients underwent SRS to targets within the medial temporal lobe, and both achieve significant improvements in seizure frequency and severity.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>SRS has generally been shown to be inferior to ATL for seizure reduction in medically refractory mTLE. However, there are patients with epilepsy for which SRS can be considered, such as patients with medical comorbidities that make surgery high risk, patients with epileptogenic foci in eloquent cortex, patients who have failed to respond to surgical management, patients who choose not to undergo surgery, and patients with geographic constraints to epilepsy centers. Patients and their physicians should be aware that SRS is not risk-free. Patients should be counseled on the latency period and monitored for risks such as delayed cerebral edema, visual field deficits, and radiation necrosis.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0303846724004372\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0303846724004372","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言约有 30% 的癫痫患者会出现医学难治性癫痫 (MRE),可供选择的治疗方法也在不断演变。内侧颞叶癫痫(mTLE)的经典治疗方法是前颞叶切除术(ATL),但为了寻找创伤性较小的治疗方法,神经调控、消融术和立体定向放射外科(SRS)等治疗方法应运而生。SRS 是一种极具吸引力的非侵入性治疗方法,在过去的几十年里,SRS 在文献中的出现率越来越高。本文通过两个病例概述了 SRS 治疗 MRE 的情况,并讨论了这种治疗方法的最佳技术以及优势、替代方案和风险。病例我们介绍了两个 MRE 患者的病例,这些患者不适合采用侵入性手术治疗方案,因此接受了 SRS 治疗。第一个病例是一名 65 岁的女性,患有多种并发症,其癫痫灶位于左侧颞叶;第二个病例是一名 19 岁的男性,患有蛋白 C 缺乏症和内侧颞叶硬化症。这两名患者都接受了针对颞叶内侧靶点的SRS治疗,其癫痫发作频率和严重程度都得到了显著改善。然而,有些癫痫患者可以考虑接受SRS治疗,如合并有内科疾病而手术风险较高的患者、致痫灶位于大脑皮质的患者、手术治疗无效的患者、选择不接受手术的患者以及受癫痫中心地理位置限制的患者。患者及其医生应认识到 SRS 并非没有风险。应告知患者潜伏期,并监测延迟性脑水肿、视野缺损和辐射坏死等风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stereotactic radiosurgery for medically refractory non-lesional epilepsy: A case-based Radiosurgery Society (RSS) practice review

Introduction

Medically refractory epilepsy (MRE) occurs in about 30 % of patients with epilepsy, and the treatment options available to them have evolved over time. The classic treatment for medial temporal lobe epilepsy (mTLE) is anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL), but an initiative to find less invasive options has resulted in treatments such as neuromodulation, ablative procedures, and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). SRS has been an appealing non-invasive option and has developed an increasing presence in the literature over the last few decades. This article provides an overview of SRS for MRE with two example cases, and we discuss the optimal technique as well as the advantages, alternatives, and risks of this therapeutic option.

Cases

We present two example cases of patients with MRE, who were poor candidates for invasive surgical treatment options and underwent SRS. The first case is a 65-year-old female with multiple medical comorbidities, whose seizure focus was localized to the left temporal lobe, and the second case is a 19-year-old male with Protein C deficiency and medial temporal lobe sclerosis. Both patients underwent SRS to targets within the medial temporal lobe, and both achieve significant improvements in seizure frequency and severity.

Discussion

SRS has generally been shown to be inferior to ATL for seizure reduction in medically refractory mTLE. However, there are patients with epilepsy for which SRS can be considered, such as patients with medical comorbidities that make surgery high risk, patients with epileptogenic foci in eloquent cortex, patients who have failed to respond to surgical management, patients who choose not to undergo surgery, and patients with geographic constraints to epilepsy centers. Patients and their physicians should be aware that SRS is not risk-free. Patients should be counseled on the latency period and monitored for risks such as delayed cerebral edema, visual field deficits, and radiation necrosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
358
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery is devoted to publishing papers and reports on the clinical aspects of neurology and neurosurgery. It is an international forum for papers of high scientific standard that are of interest to Neurologists and Neurosurgeons world-wide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信