异氨硝酸盐还原(DNRA)会削弱持续还原的河岸沉积物的脱氮效果

IF 4.8 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Md. Moklesur Rahman*, Marc Peipoch, Jinjun Kan, Matthew Sena, Bisesh Joshi, Dipankar Dwivedi, Arthur J. Gold, Peter M. Groffman, Joseph G. Galella and Shreeram Inamdar, 
{"title":"异氨硝酸盐还原(DNRA)会削弱持续还原的河岸沉积物的脱氮效果","authors":"Md. Moklesur Rahman*,&nbsp;Marc Peipoch,&nbsp;Jinjun Kan,&nbsp;Matthew Sena,&nbsp;Bisesh Joshi,&nbsp;Dipankar Dwivedi,&nbsp;Arthur J. Gold,&nbsp;Peter M. Groffman,&nbsp;Joseph G. Galella and Shreeram Inamdar,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acsestwater.4c0018510.1021/acsestwater.4c00185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Denitrification (DNF) and dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium (DNRA) compete in reducing sediment conditions where DNF permanently removes nitrogen (N), while DNRA retains N with the conversion of nitrate (NO<sub>3</sub><sup>–</sup>) to ammonium (NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>). Thus, an increase in the level of DNRA can undermine permanent N removal. We investigated the relative magnitude and controls of these two processes at two milldam-affected riparian sites. DNRA (5.2–37.6 μg L<sup>–1</sup> h<sup>–1</sup>) accounted for 10–79% of total NO<sub>3</sub><sup>–</sup> reduction and was highest in riparian sediments with higher iron (Fe) and sodium (Na<sup>+</sup>) in groundwater. DNF was the primary mechanism for NO<sub>3</sub><sup>–</sup> reduction when Fe and Na<sup>+</sup> concentrations were low but when NO<sub>3</sub><sup>–</sup> was elevated. DNRA rates were higher for treatments with higher dissolved organic carbon (DOC):NO<sub>3</sub><sup>–</sup> and Fe:NO<sub>3</sub><sup>–</sup> ratios, indicating the stimulation of both heterotrophic and Fe<sup>2+</sup> driven autotrophic DNRA. DNF and DNRA rates and their microbial functional genes decreased with increasing sediment depths. These findings imply that hydrologically stagnant and persistently reducing conditions associated with relict milldams and similar anthropogenic structures may enhance DNRA at the expense of DNF and undermine permanent N removal in riparian zones. Thus, the effects of such structures need to be accounted for in watershed N management strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":93847,"journal":{"name":"ACS ES&T water","volume":"4 9","pages":"3873–3881 3873–3881"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dissimilatory Nitrate Reduction to Ammonium (DNRA) Can Undermine Nitrogen Removal Effectiveness of Persistently Reducing Riparian Sediments\",\"authors\":\"Md. Moklesur Rahman*,&nbsp;Marc Peipoch,&nbsp;Jinjun Kan,&nbsp;Matthew Sena,&nbsp;Bisesh Joshi,&nbsp;Dipankar Dwivedi,&nbsp;Arthur J. Gold,&nbsp;Peter M. Groffman,&nbsp;Joseph G. Galella and Shreeram Inamdar,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acsestwater.4c0018510.1021/acsestwater.4c00185\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Denitrification (DNF) and dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium (DNRA) compete in reducing sediment conditions where DNF permanently removes nitrogen (N), while DNRA retains N with the conversion of nitrate (NO<sub>3</sub><sup>–</sup>) to ammonium (NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>). Thus, an increase in the level of DNRA can undermine permanent N removal. We investigated the relative magnitude and controls of these two processes at two milldam-affected riparian sites. DNRA (5.2–37.6 μg L<sup>–1</sup> h<sup>–1</sup>) accounted for 10–79% of total NO<sub>3</sub><sup>–</sup> reduction and was highest in riparian sediments with higher iron (Fe) and sodium (Na<sup>+</sup>) in groundwater. DNF was the primary mechanism for NO<sub>3</sub><sup>–</sup> reduction when Fe and Na<sup>+</sup> concentrations were low but when NO<sub>3</sub><sup>–</sup> was elevated. DNRA rates were higher for treatments with higher dissolved organic carbon (DOC):NO<sub>3</sub><sup>–</sup> and Fe:NO<sub>3</sub><sup>–</sup> ratios, indicating the stimulation of both heterotrophic and Fe<sup>2+</sup> driven autotrophic DNRA. DNF and DNRA rates and their microbial functional genes decreased with increasing sediment depths. These findings imply that hydrologically stagnant and persistently reducing conditions associated with relict milldams and similar anthropogenic structures may enhance DNRA at the expense of DNF and undermine permanent N removal in riparian zones. Thus, the effects of such structures need to be accounted for in watershed N management strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS ES&T water\",\"volume\":\"4 9\",\"pages\":\"3873–3881 3873–3881\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS ES&T water\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsestwater.4c00185\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS ES&T water","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsestwater.4c00185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在还原沉积物条件下,反硝化作用(DNF)和硝酸盐异纤还原成铵作用(DNRA)相互竞争,DNF 可永久去除氮(N),而 DNRA 则通过将硝酸盐(NO3-)转化成铵(NH4+)来保留氮。因此,DNRA 水平的增加会影响氮的永久去除。我们在两个受水坝影响的河岸地点调查了这两个过程的相对大小和控制情况。DNRA(5.2-37.6 μg L-1 h-1)占 NO3- 总还原量的 10-79%,在河岸沉积物中含量最高,地下水中铁(Fe)和钠(Na+)含量较高。当铁和 Na+ 浓度较低但 NO3- 浓度较高时,DNF 是 NO3- 还原的主要机制。在溶解有机碳(DOC):NO3- 和铁:NO3- 比率较高的处理中,DNRA 的速率较高,这表明异养和 Fe2+ 驱动的自养 DNRA 都受到了刺激。随着沉积深度的增加,DNF 和 DNRA 的速率及其微生物功能基因均有所下降。这些研究结果表明,与遗迹水坝和类似人为结构相关的水文停滞和持续还原条件可能会以 DNF 为代价增强 DNRA,并破坏河岸带的永久性氮清除。因此,在流域氮管理战略中需要考虑到此类结构的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Dissimilatory Nitrate Reduction to Ammonium (DNRA) Can Undermine Nitrogen Removal Effectiveness of Persistently Reducing Riparian Sediments

Dissimilatory Nitrate Reduction to Ammonium (DNRA) Can Undermine Nitrogen Removal Effectiveness of Persistently Reducing Riparian Sediments

Denitrification (DNF) and dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium (DNRA) compete in reducing sediment conditions where DNF permanently removes nitrogen (N), while DNRA retains N with the conversion of nitrate (NO3) to ammonium (NH4+). Thus, an increase in the level of DNRA can undermine permanent N removal. We investigated the relative magnitude and controls of these two processes at two milldam-affected riparian sites. DNRA (5.2–37.6 μg L–1 h–1) accounted for 10–79% of total NO3 reduction and was highest in riparian sediments with higher iron (Fe) and sodium (Na+) in groundwater. DNF was the primary mechanism for NO3 reduction when Fe and Na+ concentrations were low but when NO3 was elevated. DNRA rates were higher for treatments with higher dissolved organic carbon (DOC):NO3 and Fe:NO3 ratios, indicating the stimulation of both heterotrophic and Fe2+ driven autotrophic DNRA. DNF and DNRA rates and their microbial functional genes decreased with increasing sediment depths. These findings imply that hydrologically stagnant and persistently reducing conditions associated with relict milldams and similar anthropogenic structures may enhance DNRA at the expense of DNF and undermine permanent N removal in riparian zones. Thus, the effects of such structures need to be accounted for in watershed N management strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信