全系过渡到使用 STACK 的计算机辅助评估新模式

IF 1.2 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Ben Davies, Cosette Crisan, Eirini Geraniou, Teresa Smart
{"title":"全系过渡到使用 STACK 的计算机辅助评估新模式","authors":"Ben Davies, Cosette Crisan, Eirini Geraniou, Teresa Smart","doi":"10.1007/s40753-024-00251-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We focus on the integration of STACK—a Computer-Aided Assessment (CAA) technology—in the mathematics department of a high-ranking University in the United Kingdom. We study a department-wide project where instructors were expected to implement STACK into continuous assessment tasks for (nearly) all core modules across the first two years of undergraduate study. We present this work as a departmental case study, drawing on semi-structured interviews with six novice STACK assessment designers (and module leaders), supplemented by students’ responses to an open-response feedback questionnaire, and the reflections of a co-project lead (also first author). Our thematic analysis identified four themes related to the design of STACK-based assessments by novice to STACK tutors: the process of ‘STACKification’, technical challenges, users’ perspectives on the role of CAA, and finally, variations in assessment designers’ approaches to the role of feedback. In presenting our results, we are guided by Sangwin’s (2013) design principles for mathematics assessment. We consider various technical aspects of implementing STACK-based assessments as a first-time user, and the knowledge required to do so effectively and coherently. We conclude with a series of reflections on the role of CAA in undergraduate mathematics, and the ways in which such technology can be productively integrated with established practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":42532,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Department-Wide Transition to a New Mode of Computer-Aided Assessment Using STACK\",\"authors\":\"Ben Davies, Cosette Crisan, Eirini Geraniou, Teresa Smart\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40753-024-00251-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We focus on the integration of STACK—a Computer-Aided Assessment (CAA) technology—in the mathematics department of a high-ranking University in the United Kingdom. We study a department-wide project where instructors were expected to implement STACK into continuous assessment tasks for (nearly) all core modules across the first two years of undergraduate study. We present this work as a departmental case study, drawing on semi-structured interviews with six novice STACK assessment designers (and module leaders), supplemented by students’ responses to an open-response feedback questionnaire, and the reflections of a co-project lead (also first author). Our thematic analysis identified four themes related to the design of STACK-based assessments by novice to STACK tutors: the process of ‘STACKification’, technical challenges, users’ perspectives on the role of CAA, and finally, variations in assessment designers’ approaches to the role of feedback. In presenting our results, we are guided by Sangwin’s (2013) design principles for mathematics assessment. We consider various technical aspects of implementing STACK-based assessments as a first-time user, and the knowledge required to do so effectively and coherently. We conclude with a series of reflections on the role of CAA in undergraduate mathematics, and the ways in which such technology can be productively integrated with established practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":42532,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-024-00251-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-024-00251-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们重点研究了 STACK--计算机辅助评估(CAA)技术在英国一所名牌大学数学系的整合情况。我们研究了一个全系范围的项目,该项目要求教师在本科学习的前两年将 STACK 应用到(几乎)所有核心模块的持续评估任务中。我们通过对六位 STACK 评估设计新手(和模块负责人)进行半结构化访谈,辅以学生对开放式反馈问卷的回复,以及项目共同负责人(也是第一作者)的反思,将这项工作作为一项系级案例研究进行介绍。我们的主题分析确定了与新手到 STACK 辅导员设计基于 STACK 的评估相关的四个主题:"STACK 化 "过程、技术挑战、用户对 CAA 作用的看法,以及最后,评估设计者对反馈作用的不同处理方法。在介绍我们的成果时,我们以 Sangwin(2013 年)的数学评估设计原则为指导。作为首次使用者,我们考虑了实施基于 STACK 的评估的各种技术问题,以及有效、连贯地实施评估所需的知识。最后,我们对 CAA 在本科数学中的作用进行了一系列思考,并探讨了如何将此类技术与既有实践进行有效整合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Department-Wide Transition to a New Mode of Computer-Aided Assessment Using STACK

We focus on the integration of STACK—a Computer-Aided Assessment (CAA) technology—in the mathematics department of a high-ranking University in the United Kingdom. We study a department-wide project where instructors were expected to implement STACK into continuous assessment tasks for (nearly) all core modules across the first two years of undergraduate study. We present this work as a departmental case study, drawing on semi-structured interviews with six novice STACK assessment designers (and module leaders), supplemented by students’ responses to an open-response feedback questionnaire, and the reflections of a co-project lead (also first author). Our thematic analysis identified four themes related to the design of STACK-based assessments by novice to STACK tutors: the process of ‘STACKification’, technical challenges, users’ perspectives on the role of CAA, and finally, variations in assessment designers’ approaches to the role of feedback. In presenting our results, we are guided by Sangwin’s (2013) design principles for mathematics assessment. We consider various technical aspects of implementing STACK-based assessments as a first-time user, and the knowledge required to do so effectively and coherently. We conclude with a series of reflections on the role of CAA in undergraduate mathematics, and the ways in which such technology can be productively integrated with established practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education is dedicated to the interests of post secondary mathematics learning and teaching. It welcomes original research, including empirical, theoretical, and methodological reports of learning and teaching of undergraduate and graduate students.The journal contains insights on mathematics education from introductory courses such as calculus to higher level courses such as linear algebra, all the way through advanced courses in analysis and abstract algebra. It is also a venue for research that focuses on graduate level mathematics teaching and learning as well as research that examines how mathematicians go about their professional practice. In addition, the journal is an outlet for the publication of mathematics education research conducted in other tertiary settings, such as technical and community colleges. It provides the intellectual foundation for improving university mathematics teaching and learning and it will address specific problems in the secondary-tertiary transition. The journal contains original research reports in post-secondary mathematics. Empirical reports must be theoretically and methodologically rigorous. Manuscripts describing theoretical and methodological advances are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信