以公平为重点的加拿大六省 COVID-19 疫苗推广和优先策略综合分析:满足弱势和高危人群的需求

Mercedes Sobers, Vajini Atukorale, Dane Mauer-Vakil, Kainat Bashir, Mariame O Ouedraogo, Christoffer Dharma, Anushka Ataullahjan, Shaza A Fadel, Sara Allin
{"title":"以公平为重点的加拿大六省 COVID-19 疫苗推广和优先策略综合分析:满足弱势和高危人群的需求","authors":"Mercedes Sobers, Vajini Atukorale, Dane Mauer-Vakil, Kainat Bashir, Mariame O Ouedraogo, Christoffer Dharma, Anushka Ataullahjan, Shaza A Fadel, Sara Allin","doi":"10.1101/2024.08.28.24312721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: This study examined how six Canadian provinces (Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, Nova Scotia, Ontario, Quebec) adapted guidelines from the National Advisory Committee on Immunization to prioritize COVID-19 vaccines equitably for five key populations at high risk: Black communities; First Nations, Inuit, and Métis populations; non-medical essential workers; individuals experiencing homelessness; and individuals with disabilities. The objective was to compare timelines, justifications, and contextual factors that influenced provincial prioritization for early vaccine access. Methods: A mixed-methods approach was used to investigate how provinces operationalized equity in their vaccine rollout plans. Environmental scans (December 2020 – May 2021) gathered data on prioritization and distribution from provincial reports and media articles. Key informant interviews (December 2021 – April 2022) with provincial experts provided context on decision-making and justifications for prioritizing key populations. Data analysis employed the “Reach” component of the RE-AIM framework, with qualitative analysis of interviews following an interpretive descriptive approach. Results: Provinces used age-, risk-, and health status-based approaches to select priority populations. While all provinces consulted the National Advisory Committee on Immunization guidelines and various ethical frameworks to guide their decisions, deviations occurred due to local contexts. First Nations, Inuit, and Métis populations were prioritized earliest in all provinces, while Black communities received the least prioritization. Key subgroups, such as urban First Nations, Inuit, and Métis, unsheltered homeless individuals, and homebound disabled persons, were often overlooked. Factors that emerged as key drivers of priority population selection were data availability, population size, and geography. Conclusions: This study fills gaps in the literature by highlighting key contextual factors unique to each province that drove provincial justifications for their prioritization decisions. We provide several examples of the importance of data availability and early community-led partnerships when designing a successful mass vaccination rollout.","PeriodicalId":501276,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Public and Global Health","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Equity-Focused Comprehensive Analysis of COVID-19 Vaccine Rollout and Prioritization Strategies Across Six Canadian Provinces: Addressing the Needs of Vulnerable and High-Risk Populations\",\"authors\":\"Mercedes Sobers, Vajini Atukorale, Dane Mauer-Vakil, Kainat Bashir, Mariame O Ouedraogo, Christoffer Dharma, Anushka Ataullahjan, Shaza A Fadel, Sara Allin\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.08.28.24312721\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: This study examined how six Canadian provinces (Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, Nova Scotia, Ontario, Quebec) adapted guidelines from the National Advisory Committee on Immunization to prioritize COVID-19 vaccines equitably for five key populations at high risk: Black communities; First Nations, Inuit, and Métis populations; non-medical essential workers; individuals experiencing homelessness; and individuals with disabilities. The objective was to compare timelines, justifications, and contextual factors that influenced provincial prioritization for early vaccine access. Methods: A mixed-methods approach was used to investigate how provinces operationalized equity in their vaccine rollout plans. Environmental scans (December 2020 – May 2021) gathered data on prioritization and distribution from provincial reports and media articles. Key informant interviews (December 2021 – April 2022) with provincial experts provided context on decision-making and justifications for prioritizing key populations. Data analysis employed the “Reach” component of the RE-AIM framework, with qualitative analysis of interviews following an interpretive descriptive approach. Results: Provinces used age-, risk-, and health status-based approaches to select priority populations. While all provinces consulted the National Advisory Committee on Immunization guidelines and various ethical frameworks to guide their decisions, deviations occurred due to local contexts. First Nations, Inuit, and Métis populations were prioritized earliest in all provinces, while Black communities received the least prioritization. Key subgroups, such as urban First Nations, Inuit, and Métis, unsheltered homeless individuals, and homebound disabled persons, were often overlooked. Factors that emerged as key drivers of priority population selection were data availability, population size, and geography. Conclusions: This study fills gaps in the literature by highlighting key contextual factors unique to each province that drove provincial justifications for their prioritization decisions. We provide several examples of the importance of data availability and early community-led partnerships when designing a successful mass vaccination rollout.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Public and Global Health\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Public and Global Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.28.24312721\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Public and Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.28.24312721","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究考察了加拿大六个省份(艾伯塔省、不列颠哥伦比亚省、马尼托巴省、新斯科舍省、安大略省、魁北克省)如何调整国家免疫咨询委员会的指导方针,以公平地优先为五个主要高危人群接种 COVID-19 疫苗:黑人社区;原住民、因努伊特人和梅蒂斯人;非医疗基本工作者;无家可归者;以及残疾人。目的是比较影响各省确定早期疫苗接种优先次序的时间表、理由和背景因素。方法:采用混合方法调查各省如何在疫苗推广计划中实现公平。环境扫描(2020 年 12 月至 2021 年 5 月)从各省报告和媒体文章中收集有关优先顺序和分配的数据。对各省专家进行的关键信息访谈(2021 年 12 月至 2022 年 4 月)提供了决策背景以及优先考虑重点人群的理由。数据分析采用了 RE-AIM 框架中的 "到达 "部分,对访谈的定性分析采用了解释性描述方法。结果各省采用基于年龄、风险和健康状况的方法来选择优先人群。虽然所有省份都参考了国家免疫咨询委员会的指导方针和各种伦理框架来指导他们的决策,但由于当地的具体情况,还是出现了偏差。在所有省份中,原住民、因纽特人和梅蒂斯人最早被列为优先人群,而黑人社区的优先程度最低。城市原住民、伊努伊特人和梅蒂斯人、无家可归者和居家残疾人等关键亚群体往往被忽视。数据可用性、人口数量和地理位置是选择优先人群的关键因素。结论:本研究通过强调各省特有的关键背景因素,填补了文献中的空白,这些因素是各省做出优先决定的理由。我们提供了几个例子,说明在设计成功的大规模疫苗接种时,数据可用性和早期社区主导的合作关系的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Equity-Focused Comprehensive Analysis of COVID-19 Vaccine Rollout and Prioritization Strategies Across Six Canadian Provinces: Addressing the Needs of Vulnerable and High-Risk Populations
Objectives: This study examined how six Canadian provinces (Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, Nova Scotia, Ontario, Quebec) adapted guidelines from the National Advisory Committee on Immunization to prioritize COVID-19 vaccines equitably for five key populations at high risk: Black communities; First Nations, Inuit, and Métis populations; non-medical essential workers; individuals experiencing homelessness; and individuals with disabilities. The objective was to compare timelines, justifications, and contextual factors that influenced provincial prioritization for early vaccine access. Methods: A mixed-methods approach was used to investigate how provinces operationalized equity in their vaccine rollout plans. Environmental scans (December 2020 – May 2021) gathered data on prioritization and distribution from provincial reports and media articles. Key informant interviews (December 2021 – April 2022) with provincial experts provided context on decision-making and justifications for prioritizing key populations. Data analysis employed the “Reach” component of the RE-AIM framework, with qualitative analysis of interviews following an interpretive descriptive approach. Results: Provinces used age-, risk-, and health status-based approaches to select priority populations. While all provinces consulted the National Advisory Committee on Immunization guidelines and various ethical frameworks to guide their decisions, deviations occurred due to local contexts. First Nations, Inuit, and Métis populations were prioritized earliest in all provinces, while Black communities received the least prioritization. Key subgroups, such as urban First Nations, Inuit, and Métis, unsheltered homeless individuals, and homebound disabled persons, were often overlooked. Factors that emerged as key drivers of priority population selection were data availability, population size, and geography. Conclusions: This study fills gaps in the literature by highlighting key contextual factors unique to each province that drove provincial justifications for their prioritization decisions. We provide several examples of the importance of data availability and early community-led partnerships when designing a successful mass vaccination rollout.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信