Oleksandr Kosenkov, Michael Unterkalmsteiner, Daniel Mendez, Jannik Fischbach
{"title":"大型企业的法规要求工程:欧洲无障碍法案访谈研究","authors":"Oleksandr Kosenkov, Michael Unterkalmsteiner, Daniel Mendez, Jannik Fischbach","doi":"arxiv-2409.07313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: Regulations, such as the European Accessibility Act (EAA), impact\nthe engineering of software products and services. Managing that impact while\nproviding meaningful inputs to development teams is one of the emerging\nrequirements engineering (RE) challenges. Problem: Enterprises conduct Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA) to consider the\neffects of regulations on software products offered and formulate requirements\nat an enterprise level. Despite its practical relevance, we are unaware of any\nstudies on this large-scale regulatory RE process. Methodology: We conducted an exploratory interview study of RIA in three\nlarge enterprises. We focused on how they conduct RIA, emphasizing\ncross-functional interactions, and using the EAA as an example. Results: RIA, as a regulatory RE process, is conducted to address the needs\nof executive management and central functions. It involves coordination between\ndifferent functions and levels of enterprise hierarchy. Enterprises use\nartifacts to support interpretation and communication of the results of RIA.\nChallenges to RIA are mainly related to the execution of such coordination and\nmanaging the knowledge involved. Conclusion: RIA in large enterprises demands close coordination of multiple\nstakeholders and roles. Applying interpretation and compliance artifacts is one\napproach to support such coordination. However, there are no established\npractices for creating and managing such artifacts.","PeriodicalId":501278,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Software Engineering","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regulatory Requirements Engineering in Large Enterprises: An Interview Study on the European Accessibility Act\",\"authors\":\"Oleksandr Kosenkov, Michael Unterkalmsteiner, Daniel Mendez, Jannik Fischbach\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.07313\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Context: Regulations, such as the European Accessibility Act (EAA), impact\\nthe engineering of software products and services. Managing that impact while\\nproviding meaningful inputs to development teams is one of the emerging\\nrequirements engineering (RE) challenges. Problem: Enterprises conduct Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA) to consider the\\neffects of regulations on software products offered and formulate requirements\\nat an enterprise level. Despite its practical relevance, we are unaware of any\\nstudies on this large-scale regulatory RE process. Methodology: We conducted an exploratory interview study of RIA in three\\nlarge enterprises. We focused on how they conduct RIA, emphasizing\\ncross-functional interactions, and using the EAA as an example. Results: RIA, as a regulatory RE process, is conducted to address the needs\\nof executive management and central functions. It involves coordination between\\ndifferent functions and levels of enterprise hierarchy. Enterprises use\\nartifacts to support interpretation and communication of the results of RIA.\\nChallenges to RIA are mainly related to the execution of such coordination and\\nmanaging the knowledge involved. Conclusion: RIA in large enterprises demands close coordination of multiple\\nstakeholders and roles. Applying interpretation and compliance artifacts is one\\napproach to support such coordination. However, there are no established\\npractices for creating and managing such artifacts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - CS - Software Engineering\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - CS - Software Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.07313\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.07313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:欧洲无障碍法案》(EAA)等法规对软件产品和服务的工程设计产生了影响。管理这种影响,同时为开发团队提供有意义的投入,是新出现的需求工程(RE)挑战之一。问题:企业会进行法规影响分析(RIA),以考虑法规对所提供软件产品的影响,并制定企业级需求。尽管具有实际意义,但我们还不知道有任何关于这种大规模监管 RE 流程的研究。研究方法:我们对三家大型企业的 RIA 进行了探索性访谈研究。我们重点研究了他们如何开展监管影响评估,强调跨职能互动,并以监管局为例。研究结果监管影响评估作为一种监管 RE 流程,是为了满足执行管理层和中央职能部门的需求而开展的。它涉及不同职能部门和企业层级之间的协调。监管影响评估面临的挑战主要与执行此类协调和管理相关知识有关。结论:大型企业的 RIA 需要多个利益相关者和角色的密切协调。应用解释和合规工件是支持这种协调的一种方法。然而,目前还没有创建和管理此类人工制品的成熟做法。
Regulatory Requirements Engineering in Large Enterprises: An Interview Study on the European Accessibility Act
Context: Regulations, such as the European Accessibility Act (EAA), impact
the engineering of software products and services. Managing that impact while
providing meaningful inputs to development teams is one of the emerging
requirements engineering (RE) challenges. Problem: Enterprises conduct Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA) to consider the
effects of regulations on software products offered and formulate requirements
at an enterprise level. Despite its practical relevance, we are unaware of any
studies on this large-scale regulatory RE process. Methodology: We conducted an exploratory interview study of RIA in three
large enterprises. We focused on how they conduct RIA, emphasizing
cross-functional interactions, and using the EAA as an example. Results: RIA, as a regulatory RE process, is conducted to address the needs
of executive management and central functions. It involves coordination between
different functions and levels of enterprise hierarchy. Enterprises use
artifacts to support interpretation and communication of the results of RIA.
Challenges to RIA are mainly related to the execution of such coordination and
managing the knowledge involved. Conclusion: RIA in large enterprises demands close coordination of multiple
stakeholders and roles. Applying interpretation and compliance artifacts is one
approach to support such coordination. However, there are no established
practices for creating and managing such artifacts.