再治疗时间重要吗?预测复发性脑转移瘤重复SRS后放射性坏死的NTCP模型纳入了随时间变化的折算剂量

Manju Sharma, Issam El Naqa, Penny K Sneed
{"title":"再治疗时间重要吗?预测复发性脑转移瘤重复SRS后放射性坏死的NTCP模型纳入了随时间变化的折算剂量","authors":"Manju Sharma, Issam El Naqa, Penny K Sneed","doi":"arxiv-2409.07647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To develop and compare normal tissue complication probability (NTCP)\nmodels for recurrent brain metastases (BMs) treated with repeat single-fraction\nstereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), considering time-dependent discounted prior\ndose. Methods: We developed three NTCP models of BMs treated with\nGammaKnife-based SRS. The maximum dose to 0.2cc (D0.2cc) of each\nlesion-specific brain and one-year radionecrosis was fitted using a logistic\nmodel with equivalent-dose conversions in 2 Gy (EQD2). The M0 and M1-retreat\nmodeled radionecrosis risk following SRS to 1029 non-recurrent lesions\n(patients=262) and 2nd SRS to 149 recurrent lesions (patients=87). The M1-combo\nmodel accounted for 2nd SRS and time-dependent discounted 1st SRS dose for\nrecurrent lesions estimated by a modified Gompertzian function. Results: All\nthree models fitted the data well (Chi-2 = 0.039-0.089 and p = 0.999-1.000).\nThe fitted EQD250 was ~103 Gy for M0, ~88 Gy for M1-retreat, and ~165 Gy for\nM1-combo. The fitted EQD2_50 exhibited a progressively flatter dose-response\ncurve across the three models, with values of 1.2 Gy for M0, 0.6 Gy for\nM1-retreat, and 0.4 Gy for M1-combo. For the brain D0.2cc of 29Gy and 19Gy, the\nsteepest to shallowest dose-response or largest change in NTCP, i.e., NTCP29Gy\n- NTCP19Gy was observed in M1-retreat (0.16), M0 (0.14) and M1-combo (0.06).\nConclusions: The model-fitted parameters predict that recurrent BMs have a\nlower threshold dose tolerance and a more gradual dose response for the 2nd SRS\nthan non-recurrent BMs. This gradual dose-response becomes even more apparent\nwhen considering the time-dependent discounted 1st SRS as a cumulative 2nd SRS.\nTailoring SRS retreatment protocols based on NTCP modeling can potentially\nenhance therapeutic efficacy.","PeriodicalId":501378,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Medical Physics","volume":"63 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does time to retreatment matter? An NTCP model to predict radionecrosis after repeat SRS for recurrent brain metastases incorporating time-dependent discounted dose\",\"authors\":\"Manju Sharma, Issam El Naqa, Penny K Sneed\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.07647\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: To develop and compare normal tissue complication probability (NTCP)\\nmodels for recurrent brain metastases (BMs) treated with repeat single-fraction\\nstereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), considering time-dependent discounted prior\\ndose. Methods: We developed three NTCP models of BMs treated with\\nGammaKnife-based SRS. The maximum dose to 0.2cc (D0.2cc) of each\\nlesion-specific brain and one-year radionecrosis was fitted using a logistic\\nmodel with equivalent-dose conversions in 2 Gy (EQD2). The M0 and M1-retreat\\nmodeled radionecrosis risk following SRS to 1029 non-recurrent lesions\\n(patients=262) and 2nd SRS to 149 recurrent lesions (patients=87). The M1-combo\\nmodel accounted for 2nd SRS and time-dependent discounted 1st SRS dose for\\nrecurrent lesions estimated by a modified Gompertzian function. Results: All\\nthree models fitted the data well (Chi-2 = 0.039-0.089 and p = 0.999-1.000).\\nThe fitted EQD250 was ~103 Gy for M0, ~88 Gy for M1-retreat, and ~165 Gy for\\nM1-combo. The fitted EQD2_50 exhibited a progressively flatter dose-response\\ncurve across the three models, with values of 1.2 Gy for M0, 0.6 Gy for\\nM1-retreat, and 0.4 Gy for M1-combo. For the brain D0.2cc of 29Gy and 19Gy, the\\nsteepest to shallowest dose-response or largest change in NTCP, i.e., NTCP29Gy\\n- NTCP19Gy was observed in M1-retreat (0.16), M0 (0.14) and M1-combo (0.06).\\nConclusions: The model-fitted parameters predict that recurrent BMs have a\\nlower threshold dose tolerance and a more gradual dose response for the 2nd SRS\\nthan non-recurrent BMs. This gradual dose-response becomes even more apparent\\nwhen considering the time-dependent discounted 1st SRS as a cumulative 2nd SRS.\\nTailoring SRS retreatment protocols based on NTCP modeling can potentially\\nenhance therapeutic efficacy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - PHYS - Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - PHYS - Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.07647\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.07647","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:考虑时间依赖性贴现前剂量,建立并比较重复单分量立体定向放射手术(SRS)治疗复发性脑转移瘤(BMs)的正常组织并发症概率(NTCP)模型。方法:我们为使用基于伽玛刀的 SRS 治疗的脑转移瘤建立了三个 NTCP 模型。每个椎体特异性脑0.2cc(D0.2cc)的最大剂量和一年的放射性坏死是用2 Gy等效剂量转换(EQD2)的Logistic模型拟合的。M0和M1-再治疗模型对1029例非复发病灶(患者=262例)和149例复发病灶(患者=87例)进行SRS治疗后的放射性坏死风险进行了模拟。M1-组合模型考虑了第2次SRS以及通过改良贡培兹函数估算的复发病灶第1次SRS剂量的时间依赖性折扣。结果:所有三个模型都很好地拟合了数据(Chi-2 = 0.039-0.089 和 p = 0.999-1.000)。M0 的拟合 EQD250 为 ~103 Gy,M1-retreat 为 ~88 Gy,M1-combo 为 ~165 Gy。在三个模型中,拟合的 EQD2_50 呈逐渐平坦的剂量-反应曲线,M0 为 1.2 Gy,M1-retreat 为 0.6 Gy,M1-combo 为 0.4 Gy。对于 29Gy 和 19Gy 的脑 D0.2cc,在 M1-retreat(0.16)、M0(0.14)和 M1-combo (0.06)中观察到最深到最浅的剂量反应或最大的 NTCP 变化,即 NTCP29Gy- NTCP19Gy:根据模型拟合参数预测,与非复发性骨髓瘤相比,复发性骨髓瘤对第 2 次 SRS 的阈值剂量耐受性更低,剂量反应更渐进。如果将随时间变化的第 1 次 SRS 折算为累积的第 2 次 SRS,这种渐进的剂量反应会更加明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does time to retreatment matter? An NTCP model to predict radionecrosis after repeat SRS for recurrent brain metastases incorporating time-dependent discounted dose
Purpose: To develop and compare normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models for recurrent brain metastases (BMs) treated with repeat single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), considering time-dependent discounted prior dose. Methods: We developed three NTCP models of BMs treated with GammaKnife-based SRS. The maximum dose to 0.2cc (D0.2cc) of each lesion-specific brain and one-year radionecrosis was fitted using a logistic model with equivalent-dose conversions in 2 Gy (EQD2). The M0 and M1-retreat modeled radionecrosis risk following SRS to 1029 non-recurrent lesions (patients=262) and 2nd SRS to 149 recurrent lesions (patients=87). The M1-combo model accounted for 2nd SRS and time-dependent discounted 1st SRS dose for recurrent lesions estimated by a modified Gompertzian function. Results: All three models fitted the data well (Chi-2 = 0.039-0.089 and p = 0.999-1.000). The fitted EQD250 was ~103 Gy for M0, ~88 Gy for M1-retreat, and ~165 Gy for M1-combo. The fitted EQD2_50 exhibited a progressively flatter dose-response curve across the three models, with values of 1.2 Gy for M0, 0.6 Gy for M1-retreat, and 0.4 Gy for M1-combo. For the brain D0.2cc of 29Gy and 19Gy, the steepest to shallowest dose-response or largest change in NTCP, i.e., NTCP29Gy - NTCP19Gy was observed in M1-retreat (0.16), M0 (0.14) and M1-combo (0.06). Conclusions: The model-fitted parameters predict that recurrent BMs have a lower threshold dose tolerance and a more gradual dose response for the 2nd SRS than non-recurrent BMs. This gradual dose-response becomes even more apparent when considering the time-dependent discounted 1st SRS as a cumulative 2nd SRS. Tailoring SRS retreatment protocols based on NTCP modeling can potentially enhance therapeutic efficacy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信