{"title":"关于 \"根据太阳系星历排除作为暗物质的原始黑洞 \"的评论","authors":"James M. Cline","doi":"10.3847/2515-5172/ad7674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It was recently claimed (<ext-link ext-link-type=\"arxiv\" xlink:href=\"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2408.10799\" xlink:type=\"simple\">https://arxiv.org/pdf/2408.10799</ext-link>) that solar system ephemeris data can exclude primordial black hole (PBH) dark matter in the mass range 10<sup>18</sup>–10<sup>22</sup> g. I show that this conclusion is based on an implausible, implicit assumption; namely the uncertainty on the solar system mass within 50 au is as small as the uncertainty on the mass of the Sun. Correcting for this error, I find that ephemeris data can only constrain PBH’s with mass below 10<sup>16</sup> g, which is already excluded by constraints on their evaporation via Hawking radiation. Correcting a further error concerning the time-averaged rate of such fluctuations nullifies even this weaker constraint.","PeriodicalId":74684,"journal":{"name":"Research notes of the AAS","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comment on “Excluding Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter Based on Solar System Ephemeris”\",\"authors\":\"James M. Cline\",\"doi\":\"10.3847/2515-5172/ad7674\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It was recently claimed (<ext-link ext-link-type=\\\"arxiv\\\" xlink:href=\\\"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2408.10799\\\" xlink:type=\\\"simple\\\">https://arxiv.org/pdf/2408.10799</ext-link>) that solar system ephemeris data can exclude primordial black hole (PBH) dark matter in the mass range 10<sup>18</sup>–10<sup>22</sup> g. I show that this conclusion is based on an implausible, implicit assumption; namely the uncertainty on the solar system mass within 50 au is as small as the uncertainty on the mass of the Sun. Correcting for this error, I find that ephemeris data can only constrain PBH’s with mass below 10<sup>16</sup> g, which is already excluded by constraints on their evaporation via Hawking radiation. Correcting a further error concerning the time-averaged rate of such fluctuations nullifies even this weaker constraint.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research notes of the AAS\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research notes of the AAS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3847/2515-5172/ad7674\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research notes of the AAS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3847/2515-5172/ad7674","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
最近有人声称(https://arxiv.org/pdf/2408.10799),太阳系星历数据可以排除质量范围在1018-1022 g的原始黑洞(PBH)暗物质。我的研究表明,这一结论是基于一个难以置信的隐含假设:即太阳系质量在 50 au 范围内的不确定性与太阳质量的不确定性一样小。修正这一误差后,我发现星历表数据只能约束质量低于1016 g的PBH,而通过霍金辐射对其蒸发的约束已经排除了这一质量。修正有关这种波动的时间平均速率的进一步误差,甚至会使这种较弱的约束失效。
Comment on “Excluding Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter Based on Solar System Ephemeris”
It was recently claimed (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2408.10799) that solar system ephemeris data can exclude primordial black hole (PBH) dark matter in the mass range 1018–1022 g. I show that this conclusion is based on an implausible, implicit assumption; namely the uncertainty on the solar system mass within 50 au is as small as the uncertainty on the mass of the Sun. Correcting for this error, I find that ephemeris data can only constrain PBH’s with mass below 1016 g, which is already excluded by constraints on their evaporation via Hawking radiation. Correcting a further error concerning the time-averaged rate of such fluctuations nullifies even this weaker constraint.