在印度西印度-冈底斯平原的长期小麦生产试验中,保护性耕作提高了能源效率,减轻了碳足迹和温室气体排放

IF 2.1 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Ved Prakash Chaudhary, Chetankumar Prakash Sawant, Rahul Chaudhary, Rahul Gautam, Goraksha C. Wakchaure
{"title":"在印度西印度-冈底斯平原的长期小麦生产试验中,保护性耕作提高了能源效率,减轻了碳足迹和温室气体排放","authors":"Ved Prakash Chaudhary, Chetankumar Prakash Sawant, Rahul Chaudhary, Rahul Gautam, Goraksha C. Wakchaure","doi":"10.1007/s42106-024-00308-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Traditional rice and wheat cropping system (RWCS) of the western Indo-Gangetic Plains (IGP) is not only less productive, but also unsustainable owing to its elevated energy demands and environmental carbon footprint. Transition towards the long-term adoption of conservation agriculture (CA) technologies can possibility overcomes these constraints and making it a crucial component of modern farming systems. Therefore, the effects of conservation tillage and residue retention on wheat cultivation were evaluated from 2015–2016 to 2019–2020 under RWCS on CA fields maintained for twenty one years. Five tillage treatments viz., zero tillage without residue retention (ZT-R), zero tillage with residue retention (ZT+R), permanent bed planting without residue retention (PBP-R), rotary tillage without residue retention (RT-R) and conventional tillage without residue retention (CT-R) were evaluated in four times replicated randomised complete block design. The CT-R recorded 28%, 25%, 24%, and 16% higher energy inputs than those of the ZT+R, ZT-R, PRB-R, and RT-R, respectively. Nevertheless, the lowest grain energy output was recorded in RT-R (86,769 MJ ha<sup>−1</sup>) and CT-R (86,926 MJ ha<sup>−1</sup>). Under CT-R, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions were approximately 20%, 19%, 17%, and 10% greater than those under ZT-R, ZT+R, PRB-R, and RT-R, respectively. Compared to ZT-R, ZT+R, PRB-R, and RT-R plots, CT-R exhibited significantly lower carbon efficiency ratio and carbon sustainability index. The long-term study revealed that ZT+R represent a promising step towards sustainability, characterized by low global warming potential and high energy use efficiency. This makes it an appealing agricultural technique for wheat production in the sub-tropical IGP regions under irrigated RWCS.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Graphical Abstract</h3>","PeriodicalId":54947,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Plant Production","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conservation Tillage Enhances Energy Efficiency and Mitigates Carbon Footprint and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Long-Term Wheat Production Trials in the Western Indo-Gangetic Plain of India\",\"authors\":\"Ved Prakash Chaudhary, Chetankumar Prakash Sawant, Rahul Chaudhary, Rahul Gautam, Goraksha C. Wakchaure\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s42106-024-00308-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Traditional rice and wheat cropping system (RWCS) of the western Indo-Gangetic Plains (IGP) is not only less productive, but also unsustainable owing to its elevated energy demands and environmental carbon footprint. Transition towards the long-term adoption of conservation agriculture (CA) technologies can possibility overcomes these constraints and making it a crucial component of modern farming systems. Therefore, the effects of conservation tillage and residue retention on wheat cultivation were evaluated from 2015–2016 to 2019–2020 under RWCS on CA fields maintained for twenty one years. Five tillage treatments viz., zero tillage without residue retention (ZT-R), zero tillage with residue retention (ZT+R), permanent bed planting without residue retention (PBP-R), rotary tillage without residue retention (RT-R) and conventional tillage without residue retention (CT-R) were evaluated in four times replicated randomised complete block design. The CT-R recorded 28%, 25%, 24%, and 16% higher energy inputs than those of the ZT+R, ZT-R, PRB-R, and RT-R, respectively. Nevertheless, the lowest grain energy output was recorded in RT-R (86,769 MJ ha<sup>−1</sup>) and CT-R (86,926 MJ ha<sup>−1</sup>). Under CT-R, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions were approximately 20%, 19%, 17%, and 10% greater than those under ZT-R, ZT+R, PRB-R, and RT-R, respectively. Compared to ZT-R, ZT+R, PRB-R, and RT-R plots, CT-R exhibited significantly lower carbon efficiency ratio and carbon sustainability index. The long-term study revealed that ZT+R represent a promising step towards sustainability, characterized by low global warming potential and high energy use efficiency. This makes it an appealing agricultural technique for wheat production in the sub-tropical IGP regions under irrigated RWCS.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Graphical Abstract</h3>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54947,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Plant Production\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Plant Production\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42106-024-00308-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Plant Production","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42106-024-00308-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

印度洋-遗传平原(IGP)西部传统的水稻和小麦种植系统(RWCS)不仅产量较低,而且由于其能源需求和环境碳足迹的增加而不可持续。长期采用保护性耕作(CA)技术可以克服这些制约因素,使其成为现代农业系统的重要组成部分。因此,从 2015-2016 年到 2019-2020 年,在 RWCS 条件下,在保持了 21 年的 CA 田块上评估了保护性耕作和残留物保留对小麦种植的影响。在四次重复随机完全区组设计中,评估了五种耕作处理,即无残留物保留的零耕作(ZT-R)、有残留物保留的零耕作(ZT+R)、无残留物保留的永久床种植(PBP-R)、无残留物保留的旋耕(RT-R)和无残留物保留的常规耕作(CT-R)。与 ZT+R、ZT-R、PRB-R 和 RT-R 相比,CT-R 的能量输入分别高出 28%、25%、24% 和 16%。然而,RT-R(86,769 兆焦耳/公顷-1)和 CT-R(86,926 兆焦耳/公顷-1)的谷物能量产出最低。与 ZT-R、ZT+R、PRB-R 和 RT-R 相比,CT-R 的温室气体排放量分别高出约 20%、19%、17% 和 10%。与 ZT-R、ZT+R、PRB-R 和 RT-R 地块相比,CT-R 的碳效率比和碳可持续性指数明显较低。长期研究表明,ZT+R 具有全球变暖潜势低、能源利用效率高的特点,是实现可持续发展的一个很有前景的步骤。这使其成为亚热带 IGP 地区灌溉 RWCS 条件下小麦生产的一项有吸引力的农业技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Conservation Tillage Enhances Energy Efficiency and Mitigates Carbon Footprint and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Long-Term Wheat Production Trials in the Western Indo-Gangetic Plain of India

Conservation Tillage Enhances Energy Efficiency and Mitigates Carbon Footprint and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Long-Term Wheat Production Trials in the Western Indo-Gangetic Plain of India

Traditional rice and wheat cropping system (RWCS) of the western Indo-Gangetic Plains (IGP) is not only less productive, but also unsustainable owing to its elevated energy demands and environmental carbon footprint. Transition towards the long-term adoption of conservation agriculture (CA) technologies can possibility overcomes these constraints and making it a crucial component of modern farming systems. Therefore, the effects of conservation tillage and residue retention on wheat cultivation were evaluated from 2015–2016 to 2019–2020 under RWCS on CA fields maintained for twenty one years. Five tillage treatments viz., zero tillage without residue retention (ZT-R), zero tillage with residue retention (ZT+R), permanent bed planting without residue retention (PBP-R), rotary tillage without residue retention (RT-R) and conventional tillage without residue retention (CT-R) were evaluated in four times replicated randomised complete block design. The CT-R recorded 28%, 25%, 24%, and 16% higher energy inputs than those of the ZT+R, ZT-R, PRB-R, and RT-R, respectively. Nevertheless, the lowest grain energy output was recorded in RT-R (86,769 MJ ha−1) and CT-R (86,926 MJ ha−1). Under CT-R, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions were approximately 20%, 19%, 17%, and 10% greater than those under ZT-R, ZT+R, PRB-R, and RT-R, respectively. Compared to ZT-R, ZT+R, PRB-R, and RT-R plots, CT-R exhibited significantly lower carbon efficiency ratio and carbon sustainability index. The long-term study revealed that ZT+R represent a promising step towards sustainability, characterized by low global warming potential and high energy use efficiency. This makes it an appealing agricultural technique for wheat production in the sub-tropical IGP regions under irrigated RWCS.

Graphical Abstract

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
4.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: IJPP publishes original research papers and review papers related to physiology, ecology and production of field crops and forages at field, farm and landscape level. Preferred topics are: (1) yield gap in cropping systems: estimation, causes and closing measures, (2) ecological intensification of plant production, (3) improvement of water and nutrients management in plant production systems, (4) environmental impact of plant production, (5) climate change and plant production, and (6) responses of plant communities to extreme weather conditions. Please note that IJPP does not publish papers with a background in genetics and plant breeding, plant molecular biology, plant biotechnology, as well as soil science, meteorology, product process and post-harvest management unless they are strongly related to plant production under field conditions. Papers based on limited data or of local importance, and results from routine experiments will not normally be considered for publication. Field experiments should include at least two years and/or two environments. Papers on plants other than field crops and forages, and papers based on controlled-environment experiments will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信