Wei Chen, Chao Guo, Fanghao Lin, Ruixin Zhao, Tao Li, Paraskevas Tsangaratos, Ioanna Ilia
{"title":"探索先进的机器学习技术,绘制中国延川县滑坡易发性地图","authors":"Wei Chen, Chao Guo, Fanghao Lin, Ruixin Zhao, Tao Li, Paraskevas Tsangaratos, Ioanna Ilia","doi":"10.1007/s12145-024-01455-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Many landslides occurred every year, causing extensive property losses and casualties in China. Landslide susceptibility mapping is crucial for disaster prevention by the government or related organizations to protect people's lives and property. This study compared the performance of random forest (RF), classification and regression trees (CART), Bayesian network (BN), and logistic model trees (LMT) methods in generating landslide susceptibility maps in Yanchuan County using optimization strategy. A field survey was conducted to map 311 landslides. The dataset was divided into a training dataset and a validation dataset with a ratio of 7:3. Sixteen factors influencing landslides were identified based on a geological survey of the study area, including elevation, plan curvature, profile curvature, slope aspect, slope angle, slope length, topographic position index (TPI), terrain ruggedness index (TRI), convergence index, normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), distance to roads, distance to rivers, rainfall, soil type, lithology, and land use. The training dataset was used to train the models in Weka software, and landslide susceptibility maps were generated in GIS software. The performance of the four models was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, confusion matrix, chi-square test, and other statistical analysis methods. The comparison results show that all four machine learning models are suitable for evaluating landslide susceptibility in the study area. The performances of the RF and LMT methods are more stable than those of the other two models; thus, they are suitable for landslide susceptibility mapping.</p>","PeriodicalId":49318,"journal":{"name":"Earth Science Informatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring advanced machine learning techniques for landslide susceptibility mapping in Yanchuan County, China\",\"authors\":\"Wei Chen, Chao Guo, Fanghao Lin, Ruixin Zhao, Tao Li, Paraskevas Tsangaratos, Ioanna Ilia\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12145-024-01455-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Many landslides occurred every year, causing extensive property losses and casualties in China. Landslide susceptibility mapping is crucial for disaster prevention by the government or related organizations to protect people's lives and property. This study compared the performance of random forest (RF), classification and regression trees (CART), Bayesian network (BN), and logistic model trees (LMT) methods in generating landslide susceptibility maps in Yanchuan County using optimization strategy. A field survey was conducted to map 311 landslides. The dataset was divided into a training dataset and a validation dataset with a ratio of 7:3. Sixteen factors influencing landslides were identified based on a geological survey of the study area, including elevation, plan curvature, profile curvature, slope aspect, slope angle, slope length, topographic position index (TPI), terrain ruggedness index (TRI), convergence index, normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), distance to roads, distance to rivers, rainfall, soil type, lithology, and land use. The training dataset was used to train the models in Weka software, and landslide susceptibility maps were generated in GIS software. The performance of the four models was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, confusion matrix, chi-square test, and other statistical analysis methods. The comparison results show that all four machine learning models are suitable for evaluating landslide susceptibility in the study area. The performances of the RF and LMT methods are more stable than those of the other two models; thus, they are suitable for landslide susceptibility mapping.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Earth Science Informatics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Earth Science Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-024-01455-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth Science Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-024-01455-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Exploring advanced machine learning techniques for landslide susceptibility mapping in Yanchuan County, China
Many landslides occurred every year, causing extensive property losses and casualties in China. Landslide susceptibility mapping is crucial for disaster prevention by the government or related organizations to protect people's lives and property. This study compared the performance of random forest (RF), classification and regression trees (CART), Bayesian network (BN), and logistic model trees (LMT) methods in generating landslide susceptibility maps in Yanchuan County using optimization strategy. A field survey was conducted to map 311 landslides. The dataset was divided into a training dataset and a validation dataset with a ratio of 7:3. Sixteen factors influencing landslides were identified based on a geological survey of the study area, including elevation, plan curvature, profile curvature, slope aspect, slope angle, slope length, topographic position index (TPI), terrain ruggedness index (TRI), convergence index, normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), distance to roads, distance to rivers, rainfall, soil type, lithology, and land use. The training dataset was used to train the models in Weka software, and landslide susceptibility maps were generated in GIS software. The performance of the four models was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, confusion matrix, chi-square test, and other statistical analysis methods. The comparison results show that all four machine learning models are suitable for evaluating landslide susceptibility in the study area. The performances of the RF and LMT methods are more stable than those of the other two models; thus, they are suitable for landslide susceptibility mapping.
期刊介绍:
The Earth Science Informatics [ESIN] journal aims at rapid publication of high-quality, current, cutting-edge, and provocative scientific work in the area of Earth Science Informatics as it relates to Earth systems science and space science. This includes articles on the application of formal and computational methods, computational Earth science, spatial and temporal analyses, and all aspects of computer applications to the acquisition, storage, processing, interchange, and visualization of data and information about the materials, properties, processes, features, and phenomena that occur at all scales and locations in the Earth system’s five components (atmosphere, hydrosphere, geosphere, biosphere, cryosphere) and in space (see "About this journal" for more detail). The quarterly journal publishes research, methodology, and software articles, as well as editorials, comments, and book and software reviews. Review articles of relevant findings, topics, and methodologies are also considered.