新型超启发式算法:应用于自动电压调节器

Yunus Hinislioglu, Ugur Guvenc
{"title":"新型超启发式算法:应用于自动电压调节器","authors":"Yunus Hinislioglu, Ugur Guvenc","doi":"10.1007/s00521-024-10313-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper presents a novel optimization algorithm called hyper-heuristic fitness-distance balance success-history-based adaptive differential evolution (HH-FDB-SHADE). The hyper-heuristic algorithms have two main structures: a hyper-selection framework and a low-level heuristic (LLH) pool. In the proposed algorithm, the FDB method is preferred as a high-level selection framework to evaluate the LLH pool algorithms. In addition, a total of 10 different strategies is derived from five mutation operators and two crossover methods for using them as the LLH pool. Balancing the exploration and exploitation capability of FDB is the main reason for being the selection framework of the proposed algorithm. The success of the HH-FDB-SHADE algorithm was tested on CEC-17 and CEC-20 benchmark test suits for different dimensional search spaces, and the obtained solutions from the HH-FDB-SHADE were compared to 10 different LLH pool algorithms. In addition, the HH-FDB-SHADE algorithm has been applied to optimize the control parameters of PID, PIDF, FOPID, and PIDD<sup>2</sup> in the optimal automatic voltage regulator (AVR) design problem to reveal the improved algorithm's performance more clearly and prove its success in solving engineering problems. The results obtained from the AVR system are compared with five other effective meta-heuristic search algorithms such as the fitness-distance balance Lévy Flight distribution, differential evolution, Harris–Hawks optimization, Barnacles mating optimizer, and Moth–Flame optimization algorithms in the literature. The results of the statistical analyses indicate that HH-FDB-SHADE is the best-ranked algorithm for solving CEC-17 and CEC-20 benchmark problems and gives better results compared to the LLH pool algorithms. Besides, the proposed algorithm is more effective and robust than five other meta-heuristic algorithms in solving optimal AVR design problems.</p>","PeriodicalId":18925,"journal":{"name":"Neural Computing and Applications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A novel hyper-heuristic algorithm: an application to automatic voltage regulator\",\"authors\":\"Yunus Hinislioglu, Ugur Guvenc\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00521-024-10313-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This paper presents a novel optimization algorithm called hyper-heuristic fitness-distance balance success-history-based adaptive differential evolution (HH-FDB-SHADE). The hyper-heuristic algorithms have two main structures: a hyper-selection framework and a low-level heuristic (LLH) pool. In the proposed algorithm, the FDB method is preferred as a high-level selection framework to evaluate the LLH pool algorithms. In addition, a total of 10 different strategies is derived from five mutation operators and two crossover methods for using them as the LLH pool. Balancing the exploration and exploitation capability of FDB is the main reason for being the selection framework of the proposed algorithm. The success of the HH-FDB-SHADE algorithm was tested on CEC-17 and CEC-20 benchmark test suits for different dimensional search spaces, and the obtained solutions from the HH-FDB-SHADE were compared to 10 different LLH pool algorithms. In addition, the HH-FDB-SHADE algorithm has been applied to optimize the control parameters of PID, PIDF, FOPID, and PIDD<sup>2</sup> in the optimal automatic voltage regulator (AVR) design problem to reveal the improved algorithm's performance more clearly and prove its success in solving engineering problems. The results obtained from the AVR system are compared with five other effective meta-heuristic search algorithms such as the fitness-distance balance Lévy Flight distribution, differential evolution, Harris–Hawks optimization, Barnacles mating optimizer, and Moth–Flame optimization algorithms in the literature. The results of the statistical analyses indicate that HH-FDB-SHADE is the best-ranked algorithm for solving CEC-17 and CEC-20 benchmark problems and gives better results compared to the LLH pool algorithms. Besides, the proposed algorithm is more effective and robust than five other meta-heuristic algorithms in solving optimal AVR design problems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18925,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neural Computing and Applications\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neural Computing and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-024-10313-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neural Computing and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-024-10313-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文提出了一种新颖的优化算法,称为基于成功历史的超启发式适应性差分进化(HH-FDB-SHADE)。超启发式算法有两个主要结构:超选择框架和低级启发式(LLH)池。在所提出的算法中,首选 FDB 方法作为评估 LLH 池算法的高级选择框架。此外,五种突变算子和两种交叉方法共衍生出 10 种不同的策略,用作 LLH 池。平衡 FDB 的探索和利用能力是提出算法选择框架的主要原因。在不同维度搜索空间的 CEC-17 和 CEC-20 基准测试服上测试了 HH-FDB-SHADE 算法的成功性,并将 HH-FDB-SHADE 算法获得的解与 10 种不同的 LLH 池算法进行了比较。此外,HH-FDB-SHADE 算法还被应用于优化自动电压调节器(AVR)设计问题中的 PID、PIDF、FOPID 和 PIDD2 控制参数,以更清晰地揭示改进算法的性能,证明其在解决工程问题方面的成功。将 AVR 系统得到的结果与其他五种有效的元启发式搜索算法进行了比较,如文献中的适度-距离平衡 Lévy Flight 分布、差分进化、Harris-Hawks 优化、Barnacles 交配优化和 Moth-Flame 优化算法。统计分析结果表明,在解决 CEC-17 和 CEC-20 基准问题时,HH-FDB-SHADE 是排名最好的算法,与 LLH 池算法相比结果更好。此外,与其他五种元启发式算法相比,所提出的算法在解决 AVR 最佳设计问题时更加有效和稳健。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A novel hyper-heuristic algorithm: an application to automatic voltage regulator

A novel hyper-heuristic algorithm: an application to automatic voltage regulator

This paper presents a novel optimization algorithm called hyper-heuristic fitness-distance balance success-history-based adaptive differential evolution (HH-FDB-SHADE). The hyper-heuristic algorithms have two main structures: a hyper-selection framework and a low-level heuristic (LLH) pool. In the proposed algorithm, the FDB method is preferred as a high-level selection framework to evaluate the LLH pool algorithms. In addition, a total of 10 different strategies is derived from five mutation operators and two crossover methods for using them as the LLH pool. Balancing the exploration and exploitation capability of FDB is the main reason for being the selection framework of the proposed algorithm. The success of the HH-FDB-SHADE algorithm was tested on CEC-17 and CEC-20 benchmark test suits for different dimensional search spaces, and the obtained solutions from the HH-FDB-SHADE were compared to 10 different LLH pool algorithms. In addition, the HH-FDB-SHADE algorithm has been applied to optimize the control parameters of PID, PIDF, FOPID, and PIDD2 in the optimal automatic voltage regulator (AVR) design problem to reveal the improved algorithm's performance more clearly and prove its success in solving engineering problems. The results obtained from the AVR system are compared with five other effective meta-heuristic search algorithms such as the fitness-distance balance Lévy Flight distribution, differential evolution, Harris–Hawks optimization, Barnacles mating optimizer, and Moth–Flame optimization algorithms in the literature. The results of the statistical analyses indicate that HH-FDB-SHADE is the best-ranked algorithm for solving CEC-17 and CEC-20 benchmark problems and gives better results compared to the LLH pool algorithms. Besides, the proposed algorithm is more effective and robust than five other meta-heuristic algorithms in solving optimal AVR design problems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信