为什么韦尔认为埃米-诺特让代数成为公理数学的极乐世界?

Iulian D. Toader
{"title":"为什么韦尔认为埃米-诺特让代数成为公理数学的极乐世界?","authors":"Iulian D. Toader","doi":"arxiv-2408.08552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper attempts to clarify Weyl's metaphorical description of Emmy\nNoether's algebra as the Eldorado of axiomatics. It discusses Weyl's early view\non axiomatics, which is part of his criticism of Dedekind and Hilbert, as\nmotivated by Weyl's acquiescence to a phenomenological epistemology of\ncorrectness, then it describes Noether's work in algebra, emphasizing in\nparticular its ancestral relation to Dedekind's and Hilbert's works, as well as\nher mathematical methods, characterized by non-elementary reasoning, i.e.,\nreasoning detached from mathematical objects. The paper turns then to Weyl's\nremarks on Noether's work, and argues against assimilating her use of the\naxiomatic method in algebra to his late view on axiomatics, on the ground of\nthe latter's resistance to Noether's principle of detachment.","PeriodicalId":501462,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - MATH - History and Overview","volume":"181 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why Did Weyl Think that Emmy Noether Made Algebra the Eldorado of Axiomatics?\",\"authors\":\"Iulian D. Toader\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2408.08552\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper attempts to clarify Weyl's metaphorical description of Emmy\\nNoether's algebra as the Eldorado of axiomatics. It discusses Weyl's early view\\non axiomatics, which is part of his criticism of Dedekind and Hilbert, as\\nmotivated by Weyl's acquiescence to a phenomenological epistemology of\\ncorrectness, then it describes Noether's work in algebra, emphasizing in\\nparticular its ancestral relation to Dedekind's and Hilbert's works, as well as\\nher mathematical methods, characterized by non-elementary reasoning, i.e.,\\nreasoning detached from mathematical objects. The paper turns then to Weyl's\\nremarks on Noether's work, and argues against assimilating her use of the\\naxiomatic method in algebra to his late view on axiomatics, on the ground of\\nthe latter's resistance to Noether's principle of detachment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - MATH - History and Overview\",\"volume\":\"181 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - MATH - History and Overview\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.08552\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - MATH - History and Overview","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.08552","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文试图澄清魏尔将艾美-诺特代数比喻为公理学中的 "埃尔多拉多"。论文讨论了魏尔早期对公理的看法,这是他对戴金德和希尔伯特的批判的一部分,其动机是魏尔默认了关于正确性的现象学认识论,然后论文描述了诺特在代数学方面的工作,特别强调了其与戴金德和希尔伯特著作的祖先关系,以及她的数学方法,其特点是非元素推理,即脱离数学对象的推理。然后,论文转向韦尔对诺特工作的评论,反对将她在代数学中使用的公理化方法与他晚期关于公理化的观点相提并论,理由是后者抵制诺特的脱离原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Why Did Weyl Think that Emmy Noether Made Algebra the Eldorado of Axiomatics?
The paper attempts to clarify Weyl's metaphorical description of Emmy Noether's algebra as the Eldorado of axiomatics. It discusses Weyl's early view on axiomatics, which is part of his criticism of Dedekind and Hilbert, as motivated by Weyl's acquiescence to a phenomenological epistemology of correctness, then it describes Noether's work in algebra, emphasizing in particular its ancestral relation to Dedekind's and Hilbert's works, as well as her mathematical methods, characterized by non-elementary reasoning, i.e., reasoning detached from mathematical objects. The paper turns then to Weyl's remarks on Noether's work, and argues against assimilating her use of the axiomatic method in algebra to his late view on axiomatics, on the ground of the latter's resistance to Noether's principle of detachment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信