{"title":"GeO$_2$ 玻璃中的中程阶:使用机器学习原子间势的分子动力学与实验数据的反向蒙特卡洛拟合的比较","authors":"Kenta Matsutani, Shusuke Kasamatsu, Takeshi Usuki","doi":"arxiv-2409.06982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The short and intermediate-range order in GeO$_2$ glass are investigated by\nmolecular dynamics using machine-learning interatomic potential trained on ab\ninitio calculation data and compared with reverse Monte Carlo fitting of\nneutron diffraction data. To characterize the structural differences in each\nmodel, the total/partial structure factors, coordination number, ring size and\nshape distributions, and persistent homology analysis were performed. These\nresults show that although the two approaches yield similar two-body\ncorrelations, they can lead to three-dimensional models with very different\nshort and intermediate-range ordering. A clear difference was observed\nespecially in the ring distributions; RMC models exhibit a broad distribution\nin the ring size distribution, while neural network potential molecular\ndynamics yield much narrower ring distributions. This confirms that the density\nfunctional approximation in the ab initio calculations determines the preferred\nnetwork assembly more strictly than RMC with simple coordination constraints\nand neutron diffraction data with isotope substitution.","PeriodicalId":501234,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Materials Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of intermediate-range order in GeO$_2$ glass: molecular dynamics using machine-learning interatomic potential vs.\\\\ reverse Monte Carlo fitting to experimental data\",\"authors\":\"Kenta Matsutani, Shusuke Kasamatsu, Takeshi Usuki\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.06982\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The short and intermediate-range order in GeO$_2$ glass are investigated by\\nmolecular dynamics using machine-learning interatomic potential trained on ab\\ninitio calculation data and compared with reverse Monte Carlo fitting of\\nneutron diffraction data. To characterize the structural differences in each\\nmodel, the total/partial structure factors, coordination number, ring size and\\nshape distributions, and persistent homology analysis were performed. These\\nresults show that although the two approaches yield similar two-body\\ncorrelations, they can lead to three-dimensional models with very different\\nshort and intermediate-range ordering. A clear difference was observed\\nespecially in the ring distributions; RMC models exhibit a broad distribution\\nin the ring size distribution, while neural network potential molecular\\ndynamics yield much narrower ring distributions. This confirms that the density\\nfunctional approximation in the ab initio calculations determines the preferred\\nnetwork assembly more strictly than RMC with simple coordination constraints\\nand neutron diffraction data with isotope substitution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - PHYS - Materials Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - PHYS - Materials Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.06982\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Materials Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.06982","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究人员利用基于 abinitio 计算数据训练的机器学习原子间势,通过分子动力学研究了 GeO$_2$ 玻璃中的短程和中程阶次,并与中子衍射数据的反向蒙特卡罗拟合进行了比较。为了描述每个模型的结构差异,研究人员进行了总/部分结构因子、配位数、环尺寸和形状分布以及持久同源性分析。结果表明,尽管这两种方法产生了相似的二体相关性,但它们可以导致具有非常不同的短程和中程排序的三维模型。特别是在环的分布上观察到了明显的差异;RMC 模型在环的大小分布上表现出了宽广的分布,而神经网络势能分子动力学则产生了窄得多的环分布。这证实了 ab initio 计算中的密度函数近似比使用简单配位约束的 RMC 和同位素置换的中子衍射数据更严格地确定了首选的网络组装。
Comparison of intermediate-range order in GeO$_2$ glass: molecular dynamics using machine-learning interatomic potential vs.\ reverse Monte Carlo fitting to experimental data
The short and intermediate-range order in GeO$_2$ glass are investigated by
molecular dynamics using machine-learning interatomic potential trained on ab
initio calculation data and compared with reverse Monte Carlo fitting of
neutron diffraction data. To characterize the structural differences in each
model, the total/partial structure factors, coordination number, ring size and
shape distributions, and persistent homology analysis were performed. These
results show that although the two approaches yield similar two-body
correlations, they can lead to three-dimensional models with very different
short and intermediate-range ordering. A clear difference was observed
especially in the ring distributions; RMC models exhibit a broad distribution
in the ring size distribution, while neural network potential molecular
dynamics yield much narrower ring distributions. This confirms that the density
functional approximation in the ab initio calculations determines the preferred
network assembly more strictly than RMC with simple coordination constraints
and neutron diffraction data with isotope substitution.