达帕格列净治疗心力衰竭:关于功能能力、症状和安全性结果的综合荟萃分析

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Basilio Addo, Walter Agyeman, Sammudeen Ibrahim, Patrick Berchie
{"title":"达帕格列净治疗心力衰竭:关于功能能力、症状和安全性结果的综合荟萃分析","authors":"Basilio Addo,&nbsp;Walter Agyeman,&nbsp;Sammudeen Ibrahim,&nbsp;Patrick Berchie","doi":"10.1007/s40256-024-00669-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the comparative effects of dapagliflozin versus placebo in patients with heart failure (HF), focusing on functional capacity, symptoms, and safety outcomes.</p><h3>Background</h3><p>Despite advancements in heart failure (HF) therapy, HF is still a significant cause of recurrent hospitalization and death worldwide. Dapagliflozin has demonstrated potential in lowering hospitalizations and mortality associated with heart failure; however, its impact on functional capacity, particularly the 6-min walk distance (6MWD), and the comprehensive assessment of safety outcomes in diverse HF populations, including those with preserved or reduced ejection fraction (HFpEF and HFrEF, respectively), requires further investigation.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases were comprehensively searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the efficacy of dapagliflozin in comparison with control interventions for heart failure. The primary outcome was a change in the 6MWD, KCCQ score, and safety measures included hospitalization, all-cause mortality, and adverse events.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>In our meta-analysis of ten studies involving 12,695 patients with heart failure, dapagliflozin showed significantly improved Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) scores [risk ratio (RR) of 2.75, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.95–3.569), <i>p</i> &lt; 0.00001] and no significant differences in 6-min walk distance [6MWD; RR of 3.59, 95% CI (− 1.44 to 8.63), <i>p</i> = 0.16]. Dapagliflozin demonstrated a notable reduction in hospitalization for heart failure [RR of 0.76, 95% CI (0.68–0.84), <i>p</i> &lt; 0.00001], significant overall reduction on the effect of any cause mortality [RR of 0.90, 95% CI (0.83–0.99), <i>p</i> = 0.03). There was, however, no significant effect on adverse events [RR of 0.96, 95% CI (0.98–1.03), <i>p</i> = 0.39).</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our meta-analysis of ten trials concluded that dapagliflozin significantly improved KCCQ scores in both HFrEF and HFpEF. The improvement in 6MWD was not statistically significant but trended toward dapagliflozin. Dapagliflozin also showed a mortality benefit in patients with reduced ejection fraction; however, in patients with preserved ejection fraction, the result was not statistically significant. There was also a statistically significant reduction in heart failure hospitalizations across all classes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7652,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs","volume":"24 6","pages":"753 - 773"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dapagliflozin in Heart Failure: A Comprehensive Meta-analysis on Functional Capacity, Symptoms, and Safety Outcomes\",\"authors\":\"Basilio Addo,&nbsp;Walter Agyeman,&nbsp;Sammudeen Ibrahim,&nbsp;Patrick Berchie\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40256-024-00669-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the comparative effects of dapagliflozin versus placebo in patients with heart failure (HF), focusing on functional capacity, symptoms, and safety outcomes.</p><h3>Background</h3><p>Despite advancements in heart failure (HF) therapy, HF is still a significant cause of recurrent hospitalization and death worldwide. Dapagliflozin has demonstrated potential in lowering hospitalizations and mortality associated with heart failure; however, its impact on functional capacity, particularly the 6-min walk distance (6MWD), and the comprehensive assessment of safety outcomes in diverse HF populations, including those with preserved or reduced ejection fraction (HFpEF and HFrEF, respectively), requires further investigation.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases were comprehensively searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the efficacy of dapagliflozin in comparison with control interventions for heart failure. The primary outcome was a change in the 6MWD, KCCQ score, and safety measures included hospitalization, all-cause mortality, and adverse events.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>In our meta-analysis of ten studies involving 12,695 patients with heart failure, dapagliflozin showed significantly improved Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) scores [risk ratio (RR) of 2.75, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.95–3.569), <i>p</i> &lt; 0.00001] and no significant differences in 6-min walk distance [6MWD; RR of 3.59, 95% CI (− 1.44 to 8.63), <i>p</i> = 0.16]. Dapagliflozin demonstrated a notable reduction in hospitalization for heart failure [RR of 0.76, 95% CI (0.68–0.84), <i>p</i> &lt; 0.00001], significant overall reduction on the effect of any cause mortality [RR of 0.90, 95% CI (0.83–0.99), <i>p</i> = 0.03). There was, however, no significant effect on adverse events [RR of 0.96, 95% CI (0.98–1.03), <i>p</i> = 0.39).</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our meta-analysis of ten trials concluded that dapagliflozin significantly improved KCCQ scores in both HFrEF and HFpEF. The improvement in 6MWD was not statistically significant but trended toward dapagliflozin. Dapagliflozin also showed a mortality benefit in patients with reduced ejection fraction; however, in patients with preserved ejection fraction, the result was not statistically significant. There was also a statistically significant reduction in heart failure hospitalizations across all classes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7652,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs\",\"volume\":\"24 6\",\"pages\":\"753 - 773\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40256-024-00669-x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40256-024-00669-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景尽管心力衰竭(HF)治疗取得了进步,但心力衰竭仍是全球反复住院和死亡的重要原因。达帕格列净已证明具有降低心衰相关住院率和死亡率的潜力;然而,它对功能能力(尤其是 6 分钟步行距离 (6MWD))的影响以及对不同心衰人群(包括射血分数保留或降低的人群(分别为 HFpEF 和 HFrEF))安全性结果的综合评估还需要进一步研究。方法全面检索了PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane Library和Scopus数据库,以确定研究达帕格列净与对照干预治疗心衰疗效比较的随机对照试验(RCT)。结果在我们对10项涉及12695名心衰患者的研究进行的荟萃分析中,达帕格列净显著改善了堪萨斯城心肌病问卷(KCCQ)评分[风险比(RR)为2.75,95% 置信区间 (CI) (1.95-3.569),p < 0.00001],而 6 分钟步行距离[6MWD;RR 为 3.59,95% CI (- 1.44 至 8.63),p = 0.16]无显著差异。达帕格列净明显降低了心力衰竭住院率[RR 为 0.76,95% CI (0.68-0.84),p = 0.00001],显著降低了任何原因导致的死亡率[RR 为 0.90,95% CI (0.83-0.99),p = 0.03]。结论我们对十项试验进行的荟萃分析得出结论,达帕格列净能显著改善 HFrEF 和 HFpEF 患者的 KCCQ 评分。6MWD的改善无统计学意义,但有趋向于达帕格列净。在射血分数降低的患者中,达帕格列净也显示出对死亡率的益处;但在射血分数保留的患者中,这一结果并无统计学意义。在所有级别中,心力衰竭住院人数的减少也具有统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Dapagliflozin in Heart Failure: A Comprehensive Meta-analysis on Functional Capacity, Symptoms, and Safety Outcomes

Dapagliflozin in Heart Failure: A Comprehensive Meta-analysis on Functional Capacity, Symptoms, and Safety Outcomes

Objective

To evaluate the comparative effects of dapagliflozin versus placebo in patients with heart failure (HF), focusing on functional capacity, symptoms, and safety outcomes.

Background

Despite advancements in heart failure (HF) therapy, HF is still a significant cause of recurrent hospitalization and death worldwide. Dapagliflozin has demonstrated potential in lowering hospitalizations and mortality associated with heart failure; however, its impact on functional capacity, particularly the 6-min walk distance (6MWD), and the comprehensive assessment of safety outcomes in diverse HF populations, including those with preserved or reduced ejection fraction (HFpEF and HFrEF, respectively), requires further investigation.

Methods

PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases were comprehensively searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the efficacy of dapagliflozin in comparison with control interventions for heart failure. The primary outcome was a change in the 6MWD, KCCQ score, and safety measures included hospitalization, all-cause mortality, and adverse events.

Results

In our meta-analysis of ten studies involving 12,695 patients with heart failure, dapagliflozin showed significantly improved Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) scores [risk ratio (RR) of 2.75, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.95–3.569), p < 0.00001] and no significant differences in 6-min walk distance [6MWD; RR of 3.59, 95% CI (− 1.44 to 8.63), p = 0.16]. Dapagliflozin demonstrated a notable reduction in hospitalization for heart failure [RR of 0.76, 95% CI (0.68–0.84), p < 0.00001], significant overall reduction on the effect of any cause mortality [RR of 0.90, 95% CI (0.83–0.99), p = 0.03). There was, however, no significant effect on adverse events [RR of 0.96, 95% CI (0.98–1.03), p = 0.39).

Conclusions

Our meta-analysis of ten trials concluded that dapagliflozin significantly improved KCCQ scores in both HFrEF and HFpEF. The improvement in 6MWD was not statistically significant but trended toward dapagliflozin. Dapagliflozin also showed a mortality benefit in patients with reduced ejection fraction; however, in patients with preserved ejection fraction, the result was not statistically significant. There was also a statistically significant reduction in heart failure hospitalizations across all classes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
38
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Promoting rational therapy within the discipline of cardiology, the American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs covers all aspects of the treatment of cardiovascular disorders, particularly the place in therapy of newer and established agents. Via a program of reviews and original clinical research articles, the journal addresses major issues relating to treatment of these disorders, including the pharmacology, efficacy and adverse effects of the major classes of drugs; information on newly developed drugs and drug classes; the therapeutic implications of latest research into the aetiology of cardiovascular disorders; and the practical management of specific clinical situations. The American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs offers a range of additional enhanced features designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. Each article is accompanied by a Key Points summary, giving a time-efficient overview of the content to a wide readership. Articles may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist patients, caregivers and others in understanding important medical advances. The journal also provides the option to include various other types of enhanced features including slide sets, videos and animations. All enhanced features are peer reviewed to the same high standard as the article itself. Peer review is conducted using Editorial Manager®, supported by a database of international experts. This database is shared with other Adis journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信