{"title":"利用离散时间霍克斯过程对政治暴力和冲突事件进行贝叶斯时空建模","authors":"Raiha Browning, Hamish Patten, Judith Rousseau, Kerrie Mengersen","doi":"arxiv-2408.14940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Monitoring of conflict risk in the humanitarian sector is largely based on\nsimple historic averages. To advance our understanding, we propose Hawkes\nprocesses, a self-exciting stochastic process used to describe phenomena\nwhereby past events increase the probability of future events occurring. The\noverarching goal of this work is to assess the potential for using a more\nstatistically rigorous approach to monitor the risk of political violence and\nconflict events in practice and characterise their temporal and spatial\npatterns. The region of South Asia was selected as an exemplar of how our model can be\napplied globally. We individually analyse the various types of conflict events\nfor the countries in this region and compare the results. A Bayesian,\nspatiotemporal variant of the Hawkes process is fitted to data gathered by the\nArmed Conflict Location and Event Data (ACLED) project to obtain sub-national\nestimates of conflict risk over time and space. Our model can effectively\nestimate the risk level of these events within a statistically sound framework,\nwith a more precise understanding of the uncertainty around these estimates\nthan was previously possible. This work enables a better understanding of\nconflict events which can inform preventative measures. We demonstrate the advantages of the Bayesian framework by comparing our\nresults to maximum likelihood estimation. While maximum likelihood gives\nreasonable point estimates, the Bayesian approach is preferred when possible.\nPractical examples are presented to demonstrate how the proposed model can be\nused to monitor conflict risk. Comparing to current practices that rely on\nhistorical averages, we also show that our model is more stable and robust to\noutliers. In this work we aim to support actors in the humanitarian sector in\nmaking data-informed decisions, such as the allocation of resources in\nconflict-prone regions.","PeriodicalId":501172,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - STAT - Applications","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bayesian spatiotemporal modelling of political violence and conflict events using discrete-time Hawkes processes\",\"authors\":\"Raiha Browning, Hamish Patten, Judith Rousseau, Kerrie Mengersen\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2408.14940\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Monitoring of conflict risk in the humanitarian sector is largely based on\\nsimple historic averages. To advance our understanding, we propose Hawkes\\nprocesses, a self-exciting stochastic process used to describe phenomena\\nwhereby past events increase the probability of future events occurring. The\\noverarching goal of this work is to assess the potential for using a more\\nstatistically rigorous approach to monitor the risk of political violence and\\nconflict events in practice and characterise their temporal and spatial\\npatterns. The region of South Asia was selected as an exemplar of how our model can be\\napplied globally. We individually analyse the various types of conflict events\\nfor the countries in this region and compare the results. A Bayesian,\\nspatiotemporal variant of the Hawkes process is fitted to data gathered by the\\nArmed Conflict Location and Event Data (ACLED) project to obtain sub-national\\nestimates of conflict risk over time and space. Our model can effectively\\nestimate the risk level of these events within a statistically sound framework,\\nwith a more precise understanding of the uncertainty around these estimates\\nthan was previously possible. This work enables a better understanding of\\nconflict events which can inform preventative measures. We demonstrate the advantages of the Bayesian framework by comparing our\\nresults to maximum likelihood estimation. While maximum likelihood gives\\nreasonable point estimates, the Bayesian approach is preferred when possible.\\nPractical examples are presented to demonstrate how the proposed model can be\\nused to monitor conflict risk. Comparing to current practices that rely on\\nhistorical averages, we also show that our model is more stable and robust to\\noutliers. In this work we aim to support actors in the humanitarian sector in\\nmaking data-informed decisions, such as the allocation of resources in\\nconflict-prone regions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501172,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - STAT - Applications\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - STAT - Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.14940\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - STAT - Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.14940","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Bayesian spatiotemporal modelling of political violence and conflict events using discrete-time Hawkes processes
Monitoring of conflict risk in the humanitarian sector is largely based on
simple historic averages. To advance our understanding, we propose Hawkes
processes, a self-exciting stochastic process used to describe phenomena
whereby past events increase the probability of future events occurring. The
overarching goal of this work is to assess the potential for using a more
statistically rigorous approach to monitor the risk of political violence and
conflict events in practice and characterise their temporal and spatial
patterns. The region of South Asia was selected as an exemplar of how our model can be
applied globally. We individually analyse the various types of conflict events
for the countries in this region and compare the results. A Bayesian,
spatiotemporal variant of the Hawkes process is fitted to data gathered by the
Armed Conflict Location and Event Data (ACLED) project to obtain sub-national
estimates of conflict risk over time and space. Our model can effectively
estimate the risk level of these events within a statistically sound framework,
with a more precise understanding of the uncertainty around these estimates
than was previously possible. This work enables a better understanding of
conflict events which can inform preventative measures. We demonstrate the advantages of the Bayesian framework by comparing our
results to maximum likelihood estimation. While maximum likelihood gives
reasonable point estimates, the Bayesian approach is preferred when possible.
Practical examples are presented to demonstrate how the proposed model can be
used to monitor conflict risk. Comparing to current practices that rely on
historical averages, we also show that our model is more stable and robust to
outliers. In this work we aim to support actors in the humanitarian sector in
making data-informed decisions, such as the allocation of resources in
conflict-prone regions.