利用离散时间霍克斯过程对政治暴力和冲突事件进行贝叶斯时空建模

Raiha Browning, Hamish Patten, Judith Rousseau, Kerrie Mengersen
{"title":"利用离散时间霍克斯过程对政治暴力和冲突事件进行贝叶斯时空建模","authors":"Raiha Browning, Hamish Patten, Judith Rousseau, Kerrie Mengersen","doi":"arxiv-2408.14940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Monitoring of conflict risk in the humanitarian sector is largely based on\nsimple historic averages. To advance our understanding, we propose Hawkes\nprocesses, a self-exciting stochastic process used to describe phenomena\nwhereby past events increase the probability of future events occurring. The\noverarching goal of this work is to assess the potential for using a more\nstatistically rigorous approach to monitor the risk of political violence and\nconflict events in practice and characterise their temporal and spatial\npatterns. The region of South Asia was selected as an exemplar of how our model can be\napplied globally. We individually analyse the various types of conflict events\nfor the countries in this region and compare the results. A Bayesian,\nspatiotemporal variant of the Hawkes process is fitted to data gathered by the\nArmed Conflict Location and Event Data (ACLED) project to obtain sub-national\nestimates of conflict risk over time and space. Our model can effectively\nestimate the risk level of these events within a statistically sound framework,\nwith a more precise understanding of the uncertainty around these estimates\nthan was previously possible. This work enables a better understanding of\nconflict events which can inform preventative measures. We demonstrate the advantages of the Bayesian framework by comparing our\nresults to maximum likelihood estimation. While maximum likelihood gives\nreasonable point estimates, the Bayesian approach is preferred when possible.\nPractical examples are presented to demonstrate how the proposed model can be\nused to monitor conflict risk. Comparing to current practices that rely on\nhistorical averages, we also show that our model is more stable and robust to\noutliers. In this work we aim to support actors in the humanitarian sector in\nmaking data-informed decisions, such as the allocation of resources in\nconflict-prone regions.","PeriodicalId":501172,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - STAT - Applications","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bayesian spatiotemporal modelling of political violence and conflict events using discrete-time Hawkes processes\",\"authors\":\"Raiha Browning, Hamish Patten, Judith Rousseau, Kerrie Mengersen\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2408.14940\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Monitoring of conflict risk in the humanitarian sector is largely based on\\nsimple historic averages. To advance our understanding, we propose Hawkes\\nprocesses, a self-exciting stochastic process used to describe phenomena\\nwhereby past events increase the probability of future events occurring. The\\noverarching goal of this work is to assess the potential for using a more\\nstatistically rigorous approach to monitor the risk of political violence and\\nconflict events in practice and characterise their temporal and spatial\\npatterns. The region of South Asia was selected as an exemplar of how our model can be\\napplied globally. We individually analyse the various types of conflict events\\nfor the countries in this region and compare the results. A Bayesian,\\nspatiotemporal variant of the Hawkes process is fitted to data gathered by the\\nArmed Conflict Location and Event Data (ACLED) project to obtain sub-national\\nestimates of conflict risk over time and space. Our model can effectively\\nestimate the risk level of these events within a statistically sound framework,\\nwith a more precise understanding of the uncertainty around these estimates\\nthan was previously possible. This work enables a better understanding of\\nconflict events which can inform preventative measures. We demonstrate the advantages of the Bayesian framework by comparing our\\nresults to maximum likelihood estimation. While maximum likelihood gives\\nreasonable point estimates, the Bayesian approach is preferred when possible.\\nPractical examples are presented to demonstrate how the proposed model can be\\nused to monitor conflict risk. Comparing to current practices that rely on\\nhistorical averages, we also show that our model is more stable and robust to\\noutliers. In this work we aim to support actors in the humanitarian sector in\\nmaking data-informed decisions, such as the allocation of resources in\\nconflict-prone regions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501172,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - STAT - Applications\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - STAT - Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.14940\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - STAT - Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.14940","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人道主义部门对冲突风险的监测主要基于简单的历史平均值。为了加深理解,我们提出了霍克斯过程(Hawkesprocesses),这是一种自激随机过程,用于描述过去的事件增加了未来事件发生概率的现象。这项工作的总体目标是评估在实践中使用更加严格的统计方法来监控政治暴力和冲突事件风险的潜力,并描述其时间和空间模式。我们选择了南亚地区作为范例,说明我们的模型可以在全球范围内应用。我们分别分析了该地区各国的各类冲突事件,并对结果进行了比较。我们将霍克斯过程的贝叶斯时空变体拟合到武装冲突地点和事件数据(ACLED)项目收集的数据中,以获得冲突风险在时间和空间上的次国家级估计值。我们的模型可以在统计框架内有效地估计这些事件的风险水平,并对这些估计值的不确定性有比以前更精确的了解。这项工作有助于更好地了解冲突事件,为采取预防措施提供依据。我们将贝叶斯框架的结果与最大似然估计进行了比较,从而证明了贝叶斯框架的优势。虽然最大似然法给出了合理的点估计,但在可能的情况下,我们更倾向于使用贝叶斯方法。与当前依赖历史平均值的做法相比,我们还表明,我们的模型更加稳定,对异常值也更加稳健。在这项工作中,我们的目标是支持人道主义领域的行动者在了解数据的基础上做出决策,例如在冲突易发地区分配资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bayesian spatiotemporal modelling of political violence and conflict events using discrete-time Hawkes processes
Monitoring of conflict risk in the humanitarian sector is largely based on simple historic averages. To advance our understanding, we propose Hawkes processes, a self-exciting stochastic process used to describe phenomena whereby past events increase the probability of future events occurring. The overarching goal of this work is to assess the potential for using a more statistically rigorous approach to monitor the risk of political violence and conflict events in practice and characterise their temporal and spatial patterns. The region of South Asia was selected as an exemplar of how our model can be applied globally. We individually analyse the various types of conflict events for the countries in this region and compare the results. A Bayesian, spatiotemporal variant of the Hawkes process is fitted to data gathered by the Armed Conflict Location and Event Data (ACLED) project to obtain sub-national estimates of conflict risk over time and space. Our model can effectively estimate the risk level of these events within a statistically sound framework, with a more precise understanding of the uncertainty around these estimates than was previously possible. This work enables a better understanding of conflict events which can inform preventative measures. We demonstrate the advantages of the Bayesian framework by comparing our results to maximum likelihood estimation. While maximum likelihood gives reasonable point estimates, the Bayesian approach is preferred when possible. Practical examples are presented to demonstrate how the proposed model can be used to monitor conflict risk. Comparing to current practices that rely on historical averages, we also show that our model is more stable and robust to outliers. In this work we aim to support actors in the humanitarian sector in making data-informed decisions, such as the allocation of resources in conflict-prone regions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信