生成式人工智能:教育中教师角色的希望、争议和未来

IF 1.5 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Samar Aad, Mariann Hardey
{"title":"生成式人工智能:教育中教师角色的希望、争议和未来","authors":"Samar Aad, Mariann Hardey","doi":"10.1108/qae-02-2024-0043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Generative artificial intelligence (GAI) has seen exponential growth in recent years due to its capability to generate original content through natural language processing and comprehensive language models. This paper aims to investigate the transformative impact of GAI on higher education, focusing on the evolving roles of faculty in the classroom.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Using a phenomenological perspective and a process approach, the study involved 25 semi-structured interviews with academicians in higher education.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The findings reveal that GAI currently creates biased and commercially driven learning environments, challenging traditional pedagogical models. Despite its potential for enhancing education, the autonomous nature of GAI often prioritizes commercial interests over pedagogical goals.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>The study is limited to faculty perspectives, suggesting future research should include student viewpoints and diverse educational contexts.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>The study highlights the need for higher education institutions to develop comprehensive policies, provide training for faculty and students and design new courses that leverage GAI for personalized learning experiences and enhanced faculty research.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This paper contributes to the emerging literature on GAI’s impact on education, highlighting its dual nature as both a transformative tool and a potential threat to traditional educational roles and outcomes.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":46734,"journal":{"name":"QUALITY ASSURANCE IN EDUCATION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Generative AI: hopes, controversies and the future of faculty roles in education\",\"authors\":\"Samar Aad, Mariann Hardey\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/qae-02-2024-0043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>Generative artificial intelligence (GAI) has seen exponential growth in recent years due to its capability to generate original content through natural language processing and comprehensive language models. This paper aims to investigate the transformative impact of GAI on higher education, focusing on the evolving roles of faculty in the classroom.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>Using a phenomenological perspective and a process approach, the study involved 25 semi-structured interviews with academicians in higher education.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>The findings reveal that GAI currently creates biased and commercially driven learning environments, challenging traditional pedagogical models. Despite its potential for enhancing education, the autonomous nature of GAI often prioritizes commercial interests over pedagogical goals.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\\n<p>The study is limited to faculty perspectives, suggesting future research should include student viewpoints and diverse educational contexts.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\\n<p>The study highlights the need for higher education institutions to develop comprehensive policies, provide training for faculty and students and design new courses that leverage GAI for personalized learning experiences and enhanced faculty research.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>This paper contributes to the emerging literature on GAI’s impact on education, highlighting its dual nature as both a transformative tool and a potential threat to traditional educational roles and outcomes.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":46734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"QUALITY ASSURANCE IN EDUCATION\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"QUALITY ASSURANCE IN EDUCATION\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/qae-02-2024-0043\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"QUALITY ASSURANCE IN EDUCATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/qae-02-2024-0043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的人工智能(GAI)通过自然语言处理和综合语言模型生成原创内容的能力,近年来呈指数级增长。本文旨在研究 GAI 对高等教育的变革性影响,重点关注教师在课堂中不断演变的角色。研究结果研究结果表明,GAI 目前创造了有偏见和商业驱动的学习环境,对传统教学模式提出了挑战。尽管 GAI 具有促进教育的潜力,但其自主性往往将商业利益置于教学目标之上。研究局限/启示该研究仅限于教师的观点,建议未来的研究应包括学生观点和不同的教育背景。实践意义该研究强调,高等教育机构需要制定全面的政策,为教师和学生提供培训,并设计新课程,利用 GAI 实现个性化学习体验并加强教师研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Generative AI: hopes, controversies and the future of faculty roles in education

Purpose

Generative artificial intelligence (GAI) has seen exponential growth in recent years due to its capability to generate original content through natural language processing and comprehensive language models. This paper aims to investigate the transformative impact of GAI on higher education, focusing on the evolving roles of faculty in the classroom.

Design/methodology/approach

Using a phenomenological perspective and a process approach, the study involved 25 semi-structured interviews with academicians in higher education.

Findings

The findings reveal that GAI currently creates biased and commercially driven learning environments, challenging traditional pedagogical models. Despite its potential for enhancing education, the autonomous nature of GAI often prioritizes commercial interests over pedagogical goals.

Research limitations/implications

The study is limited to faculty perspectives, suggesting future research should include student viewpoints and diverse educational contexts.

Practical implications

The study highlights the need for higher education institutions to develop comprehensive policies, provide training for faculty and students and design new courses that leverage GAI for personalized learning experiences and enhanced faculty research.

Originality/value

This paper contributes to the emerging literature on GAI’s impact on education, highlighting its dual nature as both a transformative tool and a potential threat to traditional educational roles and outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
QUALITY ASSURANCE IN EDUCATION
QUALITY ASSURANCE IN EDUCATION EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: QAE publishes original empirical or theoretical articles on Quality Assurance issues, including dimensions and indicators of Quality and Quality Improvement, as applicable to education at all levels, including pre-primary, primary, secondary, higher and professional education. Periodically, QAE also publishes systematic reviews, research syntheses and assessment policy articles on topics of current significance. As an international journal, QAE seeks submissions on topics that have global relevance. Article submissions could pertain to the following areas integral to QAE''s mission: -organizational or program development, change and improvement -educational testing or assessment programs -evaluation of educational innovations, programs and projects -school efficiency assessments -standards, reforms, accountability, accreditation, and audits in education -tools, criteria and methods for examining or assuring quality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信