用于穿越活动断层的隧道纵向力学分析的新型半分析方法

IF 1.9 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Xuepeng Ling, Mingnian Wang, Xiao Zhang, Li Yu, Henghong Yang, Langzhou Tang, Xun Luo
{"title":"用于穿越活动断层的隧道纵向力学分析的新型半分析方法","authors":"Xuepeng Ling, Mingnian Wang, Xiao Zhang, Li Yu, Henghong Yang, Langzhou Tang, Xun Luo","doi":"10.1007/s12205-024-2645-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Tunnels that cross active faults will inevitably be severely damaged, and there are mainly five fault types. There are five main fault types: strike-slip fault, normal fault, reverse fault, and oblique-slip fault (normal or reverse strike-slip fault). However, there is no calculation method of tunnel longitudinal mechanical analysis for all fault types, and the calculation accuracy is reduced by the assumptions used in the existing calculation models to simplify the solution of complex differential equations. In pursuit of this objective, this study presents a novel semi-analytical model that accounts for five distinct types of faults and analyzes complex mathematical problems via the finite difference method, thereby circumventing the need to derive intricate analytical solutions. Additionally, an unconventional iterative approach is suggested for the computation of the nonlinear interaction between the tunnel and soil. This method exhibits exceptional efficiency, requiring less than one second per calculation on a laptop. Furthermore, when compared to a numerical model based on finite elements and varying fault displacements, this model demonstrates that the longitudinal forces and displacements are quantitatively in good approval, even when massive fault displacements are considered. Finally, this model is utilized to assess the longitudinal displacements, forces, and safety factors of the Daliang tunnel under faulting, and the failure range and failure modes are consistent with the actual situation. The suggested approach addresses a gap in the existing literature and is valuable for quickly, cost-effectively, and stably analyzing and designing tunnels intersecting with active faults.</p>","PeriodicalId":17897,"journal":{"name":"KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Novel Semi-Analytical Method for Longitudinal Mechanical Analysis of Tunnels Crossing Active Faults\",\"authors\":\"Xuepeng Ling, Mingnian Wang, Xiao Zhang, Li Yu, Henghong Yang, Langzhou Tang, Xun Luo\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12205-024-2645-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Tunnels that cross active faults will inevitably be severely damaged, and there are mainly five fault types. There are five main fault types: strike-slip fault, normal fault, reverse fault, and oblique-slip fault (normal or reverse strike-slip fault). However, there is no calculation method of tunnel longitudinal mechanical analysis for all fault types, and the calculation accuracy is reduced by the assumptions used in the existing calculation models to simplify the solution of complex differential equations. In pursuit of this objective, this study presents a novel semi-analytical model that accounts for five distinct types of faults and analyzes complex mathematical problems via the finite difference method, thereby circumventing the need to derive intricate analytical solutions. Additionally, an unconventional iterative approach is suggested for the computation of the nonlinear interaction between the tunnel and soil. This method exhibits exceptional efficiency, requiring less than one second per calculation on a laptop. Furthermore, when compared to a numerical model based on finite elements and varying fault displacements, this model demonstrates that the longitudinal forces and displacements are quantitatively in good approval, even when massive fault displacements are considered. Finally, this model is utilized to assess the longitudinal displacements, forces, and safety factors of the Daliang tunnel under faulting, and the failure range and failure modes are consistent with the actual situation. The suggested approach addresses a gap in the existing literature and is valuable for quickly, cost-effectively, and stably analyzing and designing tunnels intersecting with active faults.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17897,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-024-2645-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-024-2645-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

穿越活动断层的隧道将不可避免地受到严重破坏,主要有五种断层类型。主要有五种断层类型:走向滑动断层、正向断层、逆向断层和斜向滑动断层(正向或逆向走向滑动断层)。然而,目前还没有针对所有断层类型的隧道纵向力学分析计算方法,而且现有计算模型为简化复杂微分方程的求解而使用的假设条件降低了计算精度。为了实现这一目标,本研究提出了一种新型半解析模型,该模型考虑了五种不同类型的断层,并通过有限差分法分析复杂的数学问题,从而避免了推导复杂解析解的需要。此外,还提出了一种非常规的迭代方法,用于计算隧道与土壤之间的非线性相互作用。这种方法效率极高,在笔记本电脑上每次计算只需不到一秒钟的时间。此外,在与基于有限元和不同断层位移的数值模型进行比较时,该模型表明,即使考虑到巨大的断层位移,纵向力和位移在数量上也是非常吻合的。最后,利用该模型评估了大梁隧道在断层作用下的纵向位移、力和安全系数,其破坏范围和破坏模式与实际情况一致。该方法填补了现有文献的空白,对于快速、经济、稳定地分析和设计与活动断层相交的隧道具有重要价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Novel Semi-Analytical Method for Longitudinal Mechanical Analysis of Tunnels Crossing Active Faults

Tunnels that cross active faults will inevitably be severely damaged, and there are mainly five fault types. There are five main fault types: strike-slip fault, normal fault, reverse fault, and oblique-slip fault (normal or reverse strike-slip fault). However, there is no calculation method of tunnel longitudinal mechanical analysis for all fault types, and the calculation accuracy is reduced by the assumptions used in the existing calculation models to simplify the solution of complex differential equations. In pursuit of this objective, this study presents a novel semi-analytical model that accounts for five distinct types of faults and analyzes complex mathematical problems via the finite difference method, thereby circumventing the need to derive intricate analytical solutions. Additionally, an unconventional iterative approach is suggested for the computation of the nonlinear interaction between the tunnel and soil. This method exhibits exceptional efficiency, requiring less than one second per calculation on a laptop. Furthermore, when compared to a numerical model based on finite elements and varying fault displacements, this model demonstrates that the longitudinal forces and displacements are quantitatively in good approval, even when massive fault displacements are considered. Finally, this model is utilized to assess the longitudinal displacements, forces, and safety factors of the Daliang tunnel under faulting, and the failure range and failure modes are consistent with the actual situation. The suggested approach addresses a gap in the existing literature and is valuable for quickly, cost-effectively, and stably analyzing and designing tunnels intersecting with active faults.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering ENGINEERING, CIVIL-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
329
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: The KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering is a technical bimonthly journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers. The journal reports original study results (both academic and practical) on past practices and present information in all civil engineering fields. The journal publishes original papers within the broad field of civil engineering, which includes, but are not limited to, the following: coastal and harbor engineering, construction management, environmental engineering, geotechnical engineering, highway engineering, hydraulic engineering, information technology, nuclear power engineering, railroad engineering, structural engineering, surveying and geo-spatial engineering, transportation engineering, tunnel engineering, and water resources and hydrologic engineering
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信