全面描述 BTK 抑制剂的特异性、效力和生物效应:洞察共价和非共价机制特征

Antonia C Darragh, Andrew M Hanna, Justin H Lipner, Alastair J King, Nicole B Servant, Mirza Jahic
{"title":"全面描述 BTK 抑制剂的特异性、效力和生物效应:洞察共价和非共价机制特征","authors":"Antonia C Darragh, Andrew M Hanna, Justin H Lipner, Alastair J King, Nicole B Servant, Mirza Jahic","doi":"10.1101/2024.09.06.611550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Uncovering a drug's mechanism of action and possible adverse effects are critical components in drug discovery and development. Moreover, it provides evidence for why some drugs prove more effective than others, and how to design better drugs altogether. Here we demonstrate the utility of a high-throughput in vitro screening platform along with a comprehensive panel to aid in the characterization of fifteen BTK inhibitors that are either approved by the FDA or presently under clinical evaluation. To compare the potency of these drugs, we measured the binding affinity of each to wild-type BTK, as well as a clinically relevant resistance mutant of BTK (BTK C481S). In doing so, we discovered a considerable difference in the selectivity and potency of these BTK inhibitors to the wild-type and mutant proteins. Some of this potentially contributes to the adverse effects experienced by patients undergoing therapy using these drugs. Overall, non-covalent BTK inhibitors showed stronger potency for both the wild-type and mutant BTK when compared with that of covalent inhibitors, with the majority demonstrating a higher specificity and less off-target modulation. Additionally, we compared biological outcomes for four of these inhibitors in human cell-based models. As expected, we found different phenotypic profiles for each inhibitor. However, the two non-covalent inhibitors had fewer off-target biological effects when compared with the two covalent inhibitors. This and similar in-depth preclinical characterization of drug candidates can provide critical insights into the efficacy and mechanism of action of a compound that may affect its safety in a clinical setting.","PeriodicalId":501518,"journal":{"name":"bioRxiv - Pharmacology and Toxicology","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comprehensive Characterization of BTK Inhibitor Specificity, Potency, and Biological Effects: Insights into Covalent and Non-covalent Mechanistic Signatures\",\"authors\":\"Antonia C Darragh, Andrew M Hanna, Justin H Lipner, Alastair J King, Nicole B Servant, Mirza Jahic\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.09.06.611550\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Uncovering a drug's mechanism of action and possible adverse effects are critical components in drug discovery and development. Moreover, it provides evidence for why some drugs prove more effective than others, and how to design better drugs altogether. Here we demonstrate the utility of a high-throughput in vitro screening platform along with a comprehensive panel to aid in the characterization of fifteen BTK inhibitors that are either approved by the FDA or presently under clinical evaluation. To compare the potency of these drugs, we measured the binding affinity of each to wild-type BTK, as well as a clinically relevant resistance mutant of BTK (BTK C481S). In doing so, we discovered a considerable difference in the selectivity and potency of these BTK inhibitors to the wild-type and mutant proteins. Some of this potentially contributes to the adverse effects experienced by patients undergoing therapy using these drugs. Overall, non-covalent BTK inhibitors showed stronger potency for both the wild-type and mutant BTK when compared with that of covalent inhibitors, with the majority demonstrating a higher specificity and less off-target modulation. Additionally, we compared biological outcomes for four of these inhibitors in human cell-based models. As expected, we found different phenotypic profiles for each inhibitor. However, the two non-covalent inhibitors had fewer off-target biological effects when compared with the two covalent inhibitors. This and similar in-depth preclinical characterization of drug candidates can provide critical insights into the efficacy and mechanism of action of a compound that may affect its safety in a clinical setting.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"bioRxiv - Pharmacology and Toxicology\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"bioRxiv - Pharmacology and Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.06.611550\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"bioRxiv - Pharmacology and Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.06.611550","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

揭示药物的作用机制和可能的不良反应是药物发现和开发的关键组成部分。此外,它还能证明为什么有些药物比其他药物更有效,以及如何设计出更好的药物。在这里,我们展示了高通量体外筛选平台和综合面板的实用性,以帮助确定 15 种 BTK 抑制剂的特性,这些抑制剂或已获得 FDA 批准,或目前正在接受临床评估。为了比较这些药物的效力,我们测量了每种药物与野生型 BTK 以及与临床相关的 BTK 抗性突变体(BTK C481S)的结合亲和力。在此过程中,我们发现这些 BTK 抑制剂对野生型和突变型蛋白的选择性和效力存在很大差异。这可能是使用这些药物进行治疗的患者出现不良反应的部分原因。总的来说,与共价抑制剂相比,非共价 BTK 抑制剂对野生型和突变型 BTK 都有更强的效力,其中大多数抑制剂的特异性更高,脱靶调节更少。此外,我们还比较了其中四种抑制剂在人体细胞模型中的生物学结果。不出所料,我们发现每种抑制剂都有不同的表型特征。不过,与两种共价抑制剂相比,两种非共价抑制剂的脱靶生物效应较小。对候选药物进行这种深入的临床前表征以及类似的表征,可以为了解化合物的疗效和作用机制提供重要的见解,而这些见解可能会影响其在临床环境中的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comprehensive Characterization of BTK Inhibitor Specificity, Potency, and Biological Effects: Insights into Covalent and Non-covalent Mechanistic Signatures
Uncovering a drug's mechanism of action and possible adverse effects are critical components in drug discovery and development. Moreover, it provides evidence for why some drugs prove more effective than others, and how to design better drugs altogether. Here we demonstrate the utility of a high-throughput in vitro screening platform along with a comprehensive panel to aid in the characterization of fifteen BTK inhibitors that are either approved by the FDA or presently under clinical evaluation. To compare the potency of these drugs, we measured the binding affinity of each to wild-type BTK, as well as a clinically relevant resistance mutant of BTK (BTK C481S). In doing so, we discovered a considerable difference in the selectivity and potency of these BTK inhibitors to the wild-type and mutant proteins. Some of this potentially contributes to the adverse effects experienced by patients undergoing therapy using these drugs. Overall, non-covalent BTK inhibitors showed stronger potency for both the wild-type and mutant BTK when compared with that of covalent inhibitors, with the majority demonstrating a higher specificity and less off-target modulation. Additionally, we compared biological outcomes for four of these inhibitors in human cell-based models. As expected, we found different phenotypic profiles for each inhibitor. However, the two non-covalent inhibitors had fewer off-target biological effects when compared with the two covalent inhibitors. This and similar in-depth preclinical characterization of drug candidates can provide critical insights into the efficacy and mechanism of action of a compound that may affect its safety in a clinical setting.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信