中低收入国家诊断新生儿败血症的临床预测模型:范围综述

Samuel R Neal, Sarah Sturrock, David Musorowegomo, Hannah Gannon, Michele Zaman, Mario Cortina-Borja, Kirsty Le Doare, Michelle Heys, Gwen Chimhini, Felicity Fitzgerald
{"title":"中低收入国家诊断新生儿败血症的临床预测模型:范围综述","authors":"Samuel R Neal, Sarah Sturrock, David Musorowegomo, Hannah Gannon, Michele Zaman, Mario Cortina-Borja, Kirsty Le Doare, Michelle Heys, Gwen Chimhini, Felicity Fitzgerald","doi":"10.1101/2024.09.05.24313133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Neonatal sepsis causes significant morbidity and mortality worldwide but is difficult to diagnose clinically. Clinical prediction models (CPMs) could improve diagnostic accuracy. Neonates in low-income and middle-income countries are disproportionately affected by sepsis, yet no review has comprehensively synthesised CPMs validated in this setting. We performed a scoping review of CPMs for neonatal sepsis diagnosis validated in low-income and middle-income countries. From 4598 unique records, we included 82 studies validating 44 distinct models. Most studies were set in neonatal intensive or special care units in middle-income countries and included neonates already suspected of sepsis. Three quarters of models were only validated in one study. Our review highlights several literature gaps, particularly a paucity of studies validating models in low-income countries and the WHO African region, and models for the general neonatal population. Furthermore, heterogeneity in study populations, definitions of sepsis and reporting of models may hinder progress in this field.","PeriodicalId":501549,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Pediatrics","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical prediction models to diagnose neonatal sepsis in low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review\",\"authors\":\"Samuel R Neal, Sarah Sturrock, David Musorowegomo, Hannah Gannon, Michele Zaman, Mario Cortina-Borja, Kirsty Le Doare, Michelle Heys, Gwen Chimhini, Felicity Fitzgerald\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.09.05.24313133\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Neonatal sepsis causes significant morbidity and mortality worldwide but is difficult to diagnose clinically. Clinical prediction models (CPMs) could improve diagnostic accuracy. Neonates in low-income and middle-income countries are disproportionately affected by sepsis, yet no review has comprehensively synthesised CPMs validated in this setting. We performed a scoping review of CPMs for neonatal sepsis diagnosis validated in low-income and middle-income countries. From 4598 unique records, we included 82 studies validating 44 distinct models. Most studies were set in neonatal intensive or special care units in middle-income countries and included neonates already suspected of sepsis. Three quarters of models were only validated in one study. Our review highlights several literature gaps, particularly a paucity of studies validating models in low-income countries and the WHO African region, and models for the general neonatal population. Furthermore, heterogeneity in study populations, definitions of sepsis and reporting of models may hinder progress in this field.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.05.24313133\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.05.24313133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新生儿败血症在全球范围内造成了严重的发病率和死亡率,但临床诊断却很困难。临床预测模型(CPM)可以提高诊断的准确性。低收入和中等收入国家的新生儿受败血症的影响尤为严重,但目前还没有综述对在这种情况下验证的 CPM 进行全面总结。我们对在低收入和中等收入国家验证的新生儿败血症诊断 CPM 进行了范围界定。从 4598 份独特的记录中,我们纳入了 82 项研究,验证了 44 种不同的模型。大多数研究都是在中等收入国家的新生儿重症监护室或特殊监护室进行的,并纳入了已被怀疑患有败血症的新生儿。四分之三的模型仅在一项研究中得到验证。我们的综述强调了一些文献空白,尤其是在低收入国家和世界卫生组织非洲地区验证模型的研究以及针对普通新生儿人群的模型的研究很少。此外,研究人群、败血症定义和模型报告的异质性可能会阻碍这一领域的进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical prediction models to diagnose neonatal sepsis in low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review
Neonatal sepsis causes significant morbidity and mortality worldwide but is difficult to diagnose clinically. Clinical prediction models (CPMs) could improve diagnostic accuracy. Neonates in low-income and middle-income countries are disproportionately affected by sepsis, yet no review has comprehensively synthesised CPMs validated in this setting. We performed a scoping review of CPMs for neonatal sepsis diagnosis validated in low-income and middle-income countries. From 4598 unique records, we included 82 studies validating 44 distinct models. Most studies were set in neonatal intensive or special care units in middle-income countries and included neonates already suspected of sepsis. Three quarters of models were only validated in one study. Our review highlights several literature gaps, particularly a paucity of studies validating models in low-income countries and the WHO African region, and models for the general neonatal population. Furthermore, heterogeneity in study populations, definitions of sepsis and reporting of models may hinder progress in this field.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信