差异化双重垄断中的自由许可

IF 0.7 Q3 ECONOMICS
Tarun Kabiraj, Rittwik Chatterjee, Srobonti Chattopadhyay
{"title":"差异化双重垄断中的自由许可","authors":"Tarun Kabiraj, Rittwik Chatterjee, Srobonti Chattopadhyay","doi":"10.1007/s40953-024-00406-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We construct a differentiated duopoly model to study whether free licensing can be profitable without network externalities and demand shift effect. The efficient firm possesses a superior input-saving technology and sells inputs to the backward firm. However, the optimal input price can be constrained or unconstrained in equilibrium depending on the constellation of parameters. We have shown that free licensing can be profitable if the innovation size is small and the transferee’s input production cost is sufficiently large. But free licensing is never profitable if products are homogeneous. An increase in market size also reduces the possibility of free licensing. We have also derived an implication of free licensing in the context of pollution problem.</p>","PeriodicalId":42219,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE ECONOMICS","volume":"111 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Free Licensing in a Differentiated Duopoly\",\"authors\":\"Tarun Kabiraj, Rittwik Chatterjee, Srobonti Chattopadhyay\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40953-024-00406-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We construct a differentiated duopoly model to study whether free licensing can be profitable without network externalities and demand shift effect. The efficient firm possesses a superior input-saving technology and sells inputs to the backward firm. However, the optimal input price can be constrained or unconstrained in equilibrium depending on the constellation of parameters. We have shown that free licensing can be profitable if the innovation size is small and the transferee’s input production cost is sufficiently large. But free licensing is never profitable if products are homogeneous. An increase in market size also reduces the possibility of free licensing. We have also derived an implication of free licensing in the context of pollution problem.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":42219,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE ECONOMICS\",\"volume\":\"111 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE ECONOMICS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40953-024-00406-w\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE ECONOMICS","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40953-024-00406-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们构建了一个差异化双头垄断模型,以研究在没有网络外部性和需求转移效应的情况下,免费许可是否有利可图。高效企业拥有卓越的投入节约技术,并向落后企业出售投入品。然而,均衡时的最优投入价格可能是受约束的,也可能是无约束的,这取决于参数的组合。我们已经证明,如果创新规模较小,且受让方的投入生产成本足够大,那么自由许可是有利可图的。但如果产品是同质的,免费许可就永远无法盈利。市场规模的扩大也会降低免费许可的可能性。我们还得出了自由许可对污染问题的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Free Licensing in a Differentiated Duopoly

Free Licensing in a Differentiated Duopoly

We construct a differentiated duopoly model to study whether free licensing can be profitable without network externalities and demand shift effect. The efficient firm possesses a superior input-saving technology and sells inputs to the backward firm. However, the optimal input price can be constrained or unconstrained in equilibrium depending on the constellation of parameters. We have shown that free licensing can be profitable if the innovation size is small and the transferee’s input production cost is sufficiently large. But free licensing is never profitable if products are homogeneous. An increase in market size also reduces the possibility of free licensing. We have also derived an implication of free licensing in the context of pollution problem.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Quantitative Economics (JQEC) is a refereed journal of the Indian Econometric Society (TIES). It solicits quantitative papers with basic or applied research orientation in all sub-fields of Economics that employ rigorous theoretical, empirical and experimental methods. The Journal also encourages Short Papers and Review Articles. Innovative and fundamental papers that focus on various facets of Economics of the Emerging Market and Developing Economies are particularly welcome. With the help of an international Editorial board and carefully selected referees, it aims to minimize the time taken to complete the review process while preserving the quality of the articles published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信