反对自我定位

Emily Adlam
{"title":"反对自我定位","authors":"Emily Adlam","doi":"arxiv-2409.05259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I distinguish between pure self-locating credences and superficially\nself-locating credences, and argue that there is never any rationally\ncompelling way to assign pure self-locating credences. I first argue that from\na practical point of view, pure self-locating credences simply encode our\npragmatic goals, and thus pragmatic rationality does not dictate how they must\nbe set. I then use considerations motivated by Bertrand's paradox to argue that\nthe indifference principle and other popular constraints on self-locating\ncredences fail to be a priori principles of epistemic rationality, and I\ncritique some approaches to deriving self-locating credences based on analogies\nto non-self-locating cases. Finally, I consider the implications of this\nconclusion for various applications of self-locating probabilities in\nscientific contexts, arguing that it may undermine certain kinds of reasoning\nabout multiverses, the simulation hypothesis, and Boltzmann brains.","PeriodicalId":501042,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - History and Philosophy of Physics","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Against Self-Location\",\"authors\":\"Emily Adlam\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.05259\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I distinguish between pure self-locating credences and superficially\\nself-locating credences, and argue that there is never any rationally\\ncompelling way to assign pure self-locating credences. I first argue that from\\na practical point of view, pure self-locating credences simply encode our\\npragmatic goals, and thus pragmatic rationality does not dictate how they must\\nbe set. I then use considerations motivated by Bertrand's paradox to argue that\\nthe indifference principle and other popular constraints on self-locating\\ncredences fail to be a priori principles of epistemic rationality, and I\\ncritique some approaches to deriving self-locating credences based on analogies\\nto non-self-locating cases. Finally, I consider the implications of this\\nconclusion for various applications of self-locating probabilities in\\nscientific contexts, arguing that it may undermine certain kinds of reasoning\\nabout multiverses, the simulation hypothesis, and Boltzmann brains.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - PHYS - History and Philosophy of Physics\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - PHYS - History and Philosophy of Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.05259\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - History and Philosophy of Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.05259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我将纯粹的自我定位信条与表面上的自我定位信条区分开来,并认为从理性上讲,从来没有任何令人信服的方法来分配纯粹的自我定位信条。我首先论证说,从实用的角度来看,纯粹的自我定位信条只是编码了我们的实用目标,因此实用理性并不决定必须如何设定这些信条。然后,我利用贝特朗悖论所引发的思考来论证,冷漠原则和其他流行的自我定位信条约束并不能成为认识理性的先验原则,我还批判了一些基于对非自我定位案例的类比来推导自我定位信条的方法。最后,我考虑了这一结论对自我定位概率在科学语境中的各种应用的影响,认为它可能会破坏某些关于多重宇宙、模拟假说和玻尔兹曼大脑的推理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Against Self-Location
I distinguish between pure self-locating credences and superficially self-locating credences, and argue that there is never any rationally compelling way to assign pure self-locating credences. I first argue that from a practical point of view, pure self-locating credences simply encode our pragmatic goals, and thus pragmatic rationality does not dictate how they must be set. I then use considerations motivated by Bertrand's paradox to argue that the indifference principle and other popular constraints on self-locating credences fail to be a priori principles of epistemic rationality, and I critique some approaches to deriving self-locating credences based on analogies to non-self-locating cases. Finally, I consider the implications of this conclusion for various applications of self-locating probabilities in scientific contexts, arguing that it may undermine certain kinds of reasoning about multiverses, the simulation hypothesis, and Boltzmann brains.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信