基于植物化学标记的 HPTLC 方法,用于从印度不同地区的地质样本中分离洋紫荆(Bauhinia vahlii Wight and Arn.

IF 1.1 4区 化学 Q4 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Himanshu Sharma, Sujeet K. Mishra, Rani Khan, Shyam Baboo Prasad, Ch. Venkata Narasimhaji, N. Srikanth, Rabinarayan Acharya
{"title":"基于植物化学标记的 HPTLC 方法,用于从印度不同地区的地质样本中分离洋紫荆(Bauhinia vahlii Wight and Arn.","authors":"Himanshu Sharma, Sujeet K. Mishra, Rani Khan, Shyam Baboo Prasad, Ch. Venkata Narasimhaji, N. Srikanth, Rabinarayan Acharya","doi":"10.1007/s00764-024-00314-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>Bauhinia vahlii</i> Wight and Arn. is a commonly used climber in traditional medicinal practices. The present work introduces a validated high-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC) method for identifying the superior <i>B. vahlii</i> species from various regions in India, such as Pune, Jhansi, and Ranikhet, by analyzing phytochemical markers. The current study identified and estimated lupeol and <i>β</i>-sitosterol in leaf extracts of <i>B. vahlii</i>, detecting them as magenta and violet grey bands using anisaldehyde‒sulfuric acid reagent at retention factor (<i>R</i><sub>F</sub>) ~0.68 and <i>R</i><sub>F</sub> ~0.53, respectively, at 514 nm. This was achieved using a mobile phase consisting of toluene‒ethyl acetate‒formic acid (8:2:0.2, <i>V/V</i>). The method was validated for parameters such as linearity, limits of detection, and quantification and precision, as per the International Council for Harmonisation (ICH) guidelines Q2R1. The calibration plots of the analyzed data exhibited a good linear relationship with <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.99 ± 0.02 in the concentration range 200‒1400 ng per spot for lupeol and 600‒1300 ng per spot for <i>β</i>-sitosterol with respect to the peak area. Lupeol was quantified as 61.61, 37.10, and 63.14 µg in 100 mg leaf extracts of <i>B. vahlii</i> collected from Pune, Jhansi, and Ranikhet regions of India, respectively. Meanwhile, <i>β</i>-sitosterol was determined to be 116.80, 105.13, and 90.25 µg from Pune, Jhansi, and Ranikhet, respectively, in 100.0 mg of the sample. Among the three locations, Ranikhet exhibited the highest lupeol content, while Pune showed the highest <i>β</i>-sitosterol estimation. The validated HPTLC method employed was simple, accurate, and reproducible for the rapid screening of <i>B. vahlii</i> collected from diverse Indian topographies. This study may be utilized as a valuable quality assessment tool for stakeholders, aiding adherence to Good Manufacturing Practice standards.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Graphical abstract</h3>\n","PeriodicalId":17616,"journal":{"name":"Jpc-journal of Planar Chromatography-modern Tlc","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A validated phytochemical marker based HPTLC method for the segregation of Bauhinia vahlii Wight and Arn. from geologically different samples of Indian zones\",\"authors\":\"Himanshu Sharma, Sujeet K. Mishra, Rani Khan, Shyam Baboo Prasad, Ch. Venkata Narasimhaji, N. Srikanth, Rabinarayan Acharya\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00764-024-00314-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><i>Bauhinia vahlii</i> Wight and Arn. is a commonly used climber in traditional medicinal practices. The present work introduces a validated high-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC) method for identifying the superior <i>B. vahlii</i> species from various regions in India, such as Pune, Jhansi, and Ranikhet, by analyzing phytochemical markers. The current study identified and estimated lupeol and <i>β</i>-sitosterol in leaf extracts of <i>B. vahlii</i>, detecting them as magenta and violet grey bands using anisaldehyde‒sulfuric acid reagent at retention factor (<i>R</i><sub>F</sub>) ~0.68 and <i>R</i><sub>F</sub> ~0.53, respectively, at 514 nm. This was achieved using a mobile phase consisting of toluene‒ethyl acetate‒formic acid (8:2:0.2, <i>V/V</i>). The method was validated for parameters such as linearity, limits of detection, and quantification and precision, as per the International Council for Harmonisation (ICH) guidelines Q2R1. The calibration plots of the analyzed data exhibited a good linear relationship with <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.99 ± 0.02 in the concentration range 200‒1400 ng per spot for lupeol and 600‒1300 ng per spot for <i>β</i>-sitosterol with respect to the peak area. Lupeol was quantified as 61.61, 37.10, and 63.14 µg in 100 mg leaf extracts of <i>B. vahlii</i> collected from Pune, Jhansi, and Ranikhet regions of India, respectively. Meanwhile, <i>β</i>-sitosterol was determined to be 116.80, 105.13, and 90.25 µg from Pune, Jhansi, and Ranikhet, respectively, in 100.0 mg of the sample. Among the three locations, Ranikhet exhibited the highest lupeol content, while Pune showed the highest <i>β</i>-sitosterol estimation. The validated HPTLC method employed was simple, accurate, and reproducible for the rapid screening of <i>B. vahlii</i> collected from diverse Indian topographies. This study may be utilized as a valuable quality assessment tool for stakeholders, aiding adherence to Good Manufacturing Practice standards.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Graphical abstract</h3>\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":17616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jpc-journal of Planar Chromatography-modern Tlc\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jpc-journal of Planar Chromatography-modern Tlc\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00764-024-00314-y\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jpc-journal of Planar Chromatography-modern Tlc","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00764-024-00314-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

洋紫荆(Bauhinia vahlii Wight and Arn.本研究介绍了一种经过验证的高效薄层色谱(HPTLC)方法,通过分析植物化学标记物来鉴定印度不同地区(如普纳、詹西和拉尼赫特)的上等紫荆属植物。目前的研究鉴定并估算了 B. vahlii 叶提取物中的羽扇豆醇和 β-谷甾醇,使用苯甲醛-硫酸试剂在 514 纳米波长处分别检测到品红色和紫灰色条带,保留因子 (RF) 分别为 ~0.68 和 RF ~0.53。该方法采用甲苯-乙酸乙酯-甲酸(8:2:0.2, V/V)流动相。根据国际协调理事会(ICH)指南 Q2R1,对该方法的线性、检出限、定量和精密度等参数进行了验证。在羽扇豆醇和β-谷甾醇的浓度范围分别为200-1400 ng/点和600-1300 ng/点时,分析数据的校准图与峰面积呈良好的线性关系,R2 = 0.99 ± 0.02。从印度浦那、詹西和拉尼赫特地区采集的 100 毫克 B. vahlii 叶提取物中,羽扇豆醇的定量值分别为 61.61、37.10 和 63.14 微克。同时,在浦那、詹西和拉尼赫特采集的 100.0 毫克样本中,β-谷甾醇的含量分别为 116.80、105.13 和 90.25 微克。在这三个地点中,拉尼赫特的羽扇豆醇含量最高,而普纳的β-谷甾醇估计值最高。经过验证的 HPTLC 方法简单、准确、重现性好,可用于快速筛选从印度不同地形采集的 B. vahlii。这项研究可作为利益相关者的重要质量评估工具,帮助他们遵守良好生产规范标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A validated phytochemical marker based HPTLC method for the segregation of Bauhinia vahlii Wight and Arn. from geologically different samples of Indian zones

A validated phytochemical marker based HPTLC method for the segregation of Bauhinia vahlii Wight and Arn. from geologically different samples of Indian zones

Bauhinia vahlii Wight and Arn. is a commonly used climber in traditional medicinal practices. The present work introduces a validated high-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC) method for identifying the superior B. vahlii species from various regions in India, such as Pune, Jhansi, and Ranikhet, by analyzing phytochemical markers. The current study identified and estimated lupeol and β-sitosterol in leaf extracts of B. vahlii, detecting them as magenta and violet grey bands using anisaldehyde‒sulfuric acid reagent at retention factor (RF) ~0.68 and RF ~0.53, respectively, at 514 nm. This was achieved using a mobile phase consisting of toluene‒ethyl acetate‒formic acid (8:2:0.2, V/V). The method was validated for parameters such as linearity, limits of detection, and quantification and precision, as per the International Council for Harmonisation (ICH) guidelines Q2R1. The calibration plots of the analyzed data exhibited a good linear relationship with R2 = 0.99 ± 0.02 in the concentration range 200‒1400 ng per spot for lupeol and 600‒1300 ng per spot for β-sitosterol with respect to the peak area. Lupeol was quantified as 61.61, 37.10, and 63.14 µg in 100 mg leaf extracts of B. vahlii collected from Pune, Jhansi, and Ranikhet regions of India, respectively. Meanwhile, β-sitosterol was determined to be 116.80, 105.13, and 90.25 µg from Pune, Jhansi, and Ranikhet, respectively, in 100.0 mg of the sample. Among the three locations, Ranikhet exhibited the highest lupeol content, while Pune showed the highest β-sitosterol estimation. The validated HPTLC method employed was simple, accurate, and reproducible for the rapid screening of B. vahlii collected from diverse Indian topographies. This study may be utilized as a valuable quality assessment tool for stakeholders, aiding adherence to Good Manufacturing Practice standards.

Graphical abstract

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
18.80%
发文量
66
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: JPC - Journal of Planar Chromatography - Modern TLC is an international journal devoted exclusively to the publication of research papers on analytical and preparative planar chromatography. The journal covers all fields of planar chromatography, on all kinds of stationary phase (paper, layer, gel) and with various modes of migration of the mobile phase (capillary action or forced flow).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信