强脉冲光 (IPL) 的特定波长和强度对微生物灭活的影响

IF 5.3 2区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Hee-Jeong Hwang, Jee-Woo Kim, Jun-Bong Choi, Myong-Soo Chung
{"title":"强脉冲光 (IPL) 的特定波长和强度对微生物灭活的影响","authors":"Hee-Jeong Hwang, Jee-Woo Kim, Jun-Bong Choi, Myong-Soo Chung","doi":"10.1007/s11947-024-03560-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study aimed to determine the effects of the specific wavelength and intensity of IPL on microbial inactivation by applying IPL under various conditions with the same fluence. Nine different filters were used to obtain pulse light sources with various composition ratios in the ultraviolet (UV), visible light (VL), and infrared (IR) ranges, and the inactivation was compared among gram-positive bacteria, gram-negative bacteria, and yeast. When gram-positive bacteria were treated with a light source that accounted for 85.29% of the total wavelength in the UV range, a significant reduction of bacteria by 6 logs was achieved at the fluence of 2.16 J/cm<sup>2</sup>. However, it was noteworthy that even when UV accounted for only 11.66%, a 6-log reduction was achieved at 3.94 J/cm<sup>2</sup>. This study confirmed that the intensity of single pulses in IPL is as important as the UV range in microbial inactivation. Even if the proportion of UV in IPL is low, strong intensity of single pulses delivered to microorganisms can cause significant damage and increase inactivation. There was no significant difference in resistance to IPL between gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, but yeast showed relatively higher resistance to IPL, and this tendency was more pronounced in IPL with higher UV content.</p>","PeriodicalId":562,"journal":{"name":"Food and Bioprocess Technology","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of the Specific Wavelength and Intensity of Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) on Microbial Inactivation\",\"authors\":\"Hee-Jeong Hwang, Jee-Woo Kim, Jun-Bong Choi, Myong-Soo Chung\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11947-024-03560-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study aimed to determine the effects of the specific wavelength and intensity of IPL on microbial inactivation by applying IPL under various conditions with the same fluence. Nine different filters were used to obtain pulse light sources with various composition ratios in the ultraviolet (UV), visible light (VL), and infrared (IR) ranges, and the inactivation was compared among gram-positive bacteria, gram-negative bacteria, and yeast. When gram-positive bacteria were treated with a light source that accounted for 85.29% of the total wavelength in the UV range, a significant reduction of bacteria by 6 logs was achieved at the fluence of 2.16 J/cm<sup>2</sup>. However, it was noteworthy that even when UV accounted for only 11.66%, a 6-log reduction was achieved at 3.94 J/cm<sup>2</sup>. This study confirmed that the intensity of single pulses in IPL is as important as the UV range in microbial inactivation. Even if the proportion of UV in IPL is low, strong intensity of single pulses delivered to microorganisms can cause significant damage and increase inactivation. There was no significant difference in resistance to IPL between gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, but yeast showed relatively higher resistance to IPL, and this tendency was more pronounced in IPL with higher UV content.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":562,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food and Bioprocess Technology\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food and Bioprocess Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-024-03560-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food and Bioprocess Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-024-03560-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是通过在不同条件下使用相同流量的强脉冲光,确定强脉冲光的特定波长和强度对微生物灭活的影响。研究人员使用了九种不同的滤光片,获得了紫外线(UV)、可见光(VL)和红外线(IR)范围内不同成分比例的脉冲光源,并比较了革兰氏阳性菌、革兰氏阴性菌和酵母菌的灭活情况。当使用占紫外线范围总波长 85.29% 的光源处理革兰氏阳性细菌时,在 2.16 J/cm2 的通量下,细菌数量显著减少了 6 个对数。然而,值得注意的是,即使紫外线只占 11.66%,在 3.94 J/cm2 的通量下也能减少 6 个对数的细菌。这项研究证实,在灭活微生物方面,IPL 中单脉冲的强度与紫外线范围同样重要。即使紫外线在强脉冲光中所占的比例较低,但强强度的单脉冲照射到微生物上也会造成重大损害并增加灭活效果。革兰氏阳性菌和革兰氏阴性菌对 IPL 的抗性没有明显差异,但酵母菌对 IPL 的抗性相对较高,这种趋势在紫外线含量较高的 IPL 中更为明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effects of the Specific Wavelength and Intensity of Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) on Microbial Inactivation

Effects of the Specific Wavelength and Intensity of Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) on Microbial Inactivation

This study aimed to determine the effects of the specific wavelength and intensity of IPL on microbial inactivation by applying IPL under various conditions with the same fluence. Nine different filters were used to obtain pulse light sources with various composition ratios in the ultraviolet (UV), visible light (VL), and infrared (IR) ranges, and the inactivation was compared among gram-positive bacteria, gram-negative bacteria, and yeast. When gram-positive bacteria were treated with a light source that accounted for 85.29% of the total wavelength in the UV range, a significant reduction of bacteria by 6 logs was achieved at the fluence of 2.16 J/cm2. However, it was noteworthy that even when UV accounted for only 11.66%, a 6-log reduction was achieved at 3.94 J/cm2. This study confirmed that the intensity of single pulses in IPL is as important as the UV range in microbial inactivation. Even if the proportion of UV in IPL is low, strong intensity of single pulses delivered to microorganisms can cause significant damage and increase inactivation. There was no significant difference in resistance to IPL between gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, but yeast showed relatively higher resistance to IPL, and this tendency was more pronounced in IPL with higher UV content.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Food and Bioprocess Technology
Food and Bioprocess Technology 农林科学-食品科技
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
19.60%
发文量
200
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: Food and Bioprocess Technology provides an effective and timely platform for cutting-edge high quality original papers in the engineering and science of all types of food processing technologies, from the original food supply source to the consumer’s dinner table. It aims to be a leading international journal for the multidisciplinary agri-food research community. The journal focuses especially on experimental or theoretical research findings that have the potential for helping the agri-food industry to improve process efficiency, enhance product quality and, extend shelf-life of fresh and processed agri-food products. The editors present critical reviews on new perspectives to established processes, innovative and emerging technologies, and trends and future research in food and bioproducts processing. The journal also publishes short communications for rapidly disseminating preliminary results, letters to the Editor on recent developments and controversy, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信