评估未离心血清和血浆分析物在采集后不同时间段的稳定性

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Atiqah Mokhsin, Poonaresi Subramaniam, Sivasooriar Sivaneson, Nelson Nheu, Gobhy Ramaloo, Azana S. Hanifah, Sumitha B. Mahathevan, Mohanaraja Nadarajah, Gayathiri Sampasivam, Aletza Mohd Ismail, Thuhairah Abdul Rahman
{"title":"评估未离心血清和血浆分析物在采集后不同时间段的稳定性","authors":"Atiqah Mokhsin, Poonaresi Subramaniam, Sivasooriar Sivaneson, Nelson Nheu, Gobhy Ramaloo, Azana S. Hanifah, Sumitha B. Mahathevan, Mohanaraja Nadarajah, Gayathiri Sampasivam, Aletza Mohd Ismail, Thuhairah Abdul Rahman","doi":"10.1515/labmed-2024-0062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives Our study aimed to assess the stability of 26 biochemistry analytes in serum or plasma samples separated from blood samples centrifuged at different time intervals after collection, simulating sample transport via despatch delivery systems. Methods Blood from forty-one volunteers were collected using five serum separator tubes (SST) and five fluoride oxalate tubes (FOT) for each volunteer following written informed consent. Each of the five tubes in both groups of SST and FOT was centrifuged at one of the time intervals: 0.5 h, 4 h, 8 h, 12 and 24 h after collection. These samples were left standing prior to centrifugation at room temperature. We calculated the percentage difference for each analyte between the 0.5 h and other time intervals to assess analyte stability. The percentage difference was compared to the desirable specification for bias and reference change value (RCV). Results Mean concentration of serum potassium showed a significant increase in the percentage RCV after 8 h, while CKMB showed an increase after 12 h of delayed centrifugation compared to the baseline (0.5 h). There were no significant percentage RCV for the other analytes at all timelines. Conclusions Serum potassium and CKMB were stable up to 8 and 12 h of delayed centrifugation respectively whilst all other analytes appear stable up to 24 h, suggesting that sample transport delay of up to 8 h, with the condition that room temperature is maintained, may not have a significant impact on accuracy of the biochemistry/immunochemistry test results.","PeriodicalId":55986,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laboratory Medicine","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the stability of uncentrifuged serum and plasma analytes at various post-collection intervals\",\"authors\":\"Atiqah Mokhsin, Poonaresi Subramaniam, Sivasooriar Sivaneson, Nelson Nheu, Gobhy Ramaloo, Azana S. Hanifah, Sumitha B. Mahathevan, Mohanaraja Nadarajah, Gayathiri Sampasivam, Aletza Mohd Ismail, Thuhairah Abdul Rahman\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/labmed-2024-0062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives Our study aimed to assess the stability of 26 biochemistry analytes in serum or plasma samples separated from blood samples centrifuged at different time intervals after collection, simulating sample transport via despatch delivery systems. Methods Blood from forty-one volunteers were collected using five serum separator tubes (SST) and five fluoride oxalate tubes (FOT) for each volunteer following written informed consent. Each of the five tubes in both groups of SST and FOT was centrifuged at one of the time intervals: 0.5 h, 4 h, 8 h, 12 and 24 h after collection. These samples were left standing prior to centrifugation at room temperature. We calculated the percentage difference for each analyte between the 0.5 h and other time intervals to assess analyte stability. The percentage difference was compared to the desirable specification for bias and reference change value (RCV). Results Mean concentration of serum potassium showed a significant increase in the percentage RCV after 8 h, while CKMB showed an increase after 12 h of delayed centrifugation compared to the baseline (0.5 h). There were no significant percentage RCV for the other analytes at all timelines. Conclusions Serum potassium and CKMB were stable up to 8 and 12 h of delayed centrifugation respectively whilst all other analytes appear stable up to 24 h, suggesting that sample transport delay of up to 8 h, with the condition that room temperature is maintained, may not have a significant impact on accuracy of the biochemistry/immunochemistry test results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Laboratory Medicine\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Laboratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/labmed-2024-0062\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/labmed-2024-0062","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 我们的研究旨在评估从采集后不同时间间隔离心分离的血液样本中分离出来的血清或血浆样本中 26 种生化分析物的稳定性,模拟样本通过运送系统的运输过程。方法 在获得书面知情同意后,使用五支血清分离管(SST)和五支草酸氟化物管(FOT)采集 41 名志愿者的血液。在采集后的 0.5 小时、4 小时、8 小时、12 小时和 24 小时的时间间隔内,对 SST 和 FOT 两组的五支试管中的每支试管进行离心。离心前,这些样本在室温下静置。我们计算每种分析物在 0.5 小时和其他时间间隔之间的百分比差异,以评估分析物的稳定性。将百分比差与偏差和参考变化值(RCV)的理想规范进行比较。结果 血清钾的平均浓度在 8 小时后显示 RCV 百分比显著增加,而 CKMB 在延迟离心 12 小时后显示比基线(0.5 小时)增加。其他分析物在所有时间段的 RCV 百分比均无明显变化。结论 血清钾和 CKMB 分别在延迟离心 8 小时和 12 小时内保持稳定,而所有其他分析物在 24 小时内保持稳定,这表明在保持室温的条件下,样本运输延迟 8 小时可能不会对生化/免疫化学检验结果的准确性产生重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing the stability of uncentrifuged serum and plasma analytes at various post-collection intervals
Objectives Our study aimed to assess the stability of 26 biochemistry analytes in serum or plasma samples separated from blood samples centrifuged at different time intervals after collection, simulating sample transport via despatch delivery systems. Methods Blood from forty-one volunteers were collected using five serum separator tubes (SST) and five fluoride oxalate tubes (FOT) for each volunteer following written informed consent. Each of the five tubes in both groups of SST and FOT was centrifuged at one of the time intervals: 0.5 h, 4 h, 8 h, 12 and 24 h after collection. These samples were left standing prior to centrifugation at room temperature. We calculated the percentage difference for each analyte between the 0.5 h and other time intervals to assess analyte stability. The percentage difference was compared to the desirable specification for bias and reference change value (RCV). Results Mean concentration of serum potassium showed a significant increase in the percentage RCV after 8 h, while CKMB showed an increase after 12 h of delayed centrifugation compared to the baseline (0.5 h). There were no significant percentage RCV for the other analytes at all timelines. Conclusions Serum potassium and CKMB were stable up to 8 and 12 h of delayed centrifugation respectively whilst all other analytes appear stable up to 24 h, suggesting that sample transport delay of up to 8 h, with the condition that room temperature is maintained, may not have a significant impact on accuracy of the biochemistry/immunochemistry test results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Laboratory Medicine
Journal of Laboratory Medicine Mathematics-Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Laboratory Medicine (JLM) is a bi-monthly published journal that reports on the latest developments in laboratory medicine. Particular focus is placed on the diagnostic aspects of the clinical laboratory, although technical, regulatory, and educational topics are equally covered. The Journal specializes in the publication of high-standard, competent and timely review articles on clinical, methodological and pathogenic aspects of modern laboratory diagnostics. These reviews are critically reviewed by expert reviewers and JLM’s Associate Editors who are specialists in the various subdisciplines of laboratory medicine. In addition, JLM publishes original research articles, case reports, point/counterpoint articles and letters to the editor, all of which are peer reviewed by at least two experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信