Eymen Berkay Yorulmaz, Elif Kartal, Mehmet Cüneyd Demirel
{"title":"面向分布式模型评估的稳健模式相似度量","authors":"Eymen Berkay Yorulmaz, Elif Kartal, Mehmet Cüneyd Demirel","doi":"10.1007/s00477-024-02790-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>SPAtial EFficiency (SPAEF) metric is one of the most thoroughly used metrics in hydrologic community. In this study, our aim is to improve SPAEF by replacing the histogram match component with other statistical indices, i.e. kurtosis and earth mover’s distance, or by adding a fourth or fifth component such as kurtosis and skewness. The existing spatial metrics i.e. SPAtial efficiency (SPAEF), structural similarity (SSIM) and spatial pattern efficiency metric (SPEM) were compared with newly proposed metrics to assess their converging performance. The mesoscale hydrologic model (mHM) of the Moselle River is used to simulate streamflow (Q) and actual evapotranspiration (AET). The two-source energy balance AET during the growing season is used as monthly reference maps to calculate the spatial performance of the model. The moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer based leaf area index is utilized by the mHM via pedo-transfer functions and multi-scale parameter regionalization approach to scale the potential ET. In addition to the real monthly AET maps, we also tested these metrics using a synthetic true AET map simulated with a known parameter set for a randomly selected day. The results demonstrate that the newly developed four-component metric i.e. SPAtial Hybrid 4 (SPAH4) slightly outperforms conventional three-component metric i.e. SPAEF (3% better). However, SPAH4 significantly outperforms the other existing metrics i.e. 40% better than SSIM and 50% better than SPEM. We believe that other fields such as remote sensing, change detection, function space optimization and image processing can also benefit from SPAH4.</p>","PeriodicalId":21987,"journal":{"name":"Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment","volume":"76 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toward robust pattern similarity metric for distributed model evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Eymen Berkay Yorulmaz, Elif Kartal, Mehmet Cüneyd Demirel\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00477-024-02790-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>SPAtial EFficiency (SPAEF) metric is one of the most thoroughly used metrics in hydrologic community. In this study, our aim is to improve SPAEF by replacing the histogram match component with other statistical indices, i.e. kurtosis and earth mover’s distance, or by adding a fourth or fifth component such as kurtosis and skewness. The existing spatial metrics i.e. SPAtial efficiency (SPAEF), structural similarity (SSIM) and spatial pattern efficiency metric (SPEM) were compared with newly proposed metrics to assess their converging performance. The mesoscale hydrologic model (mHM) of the Moselle River is used to simulate streamflow (Q) and actual evapotranspiration (AET). The two-source energy balance AET during the growing season is used as monthly reference maps to calculate the spatial performance of the model. The moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer based leaf area index is utilized by the mHM via pedo-transfer functions and multi-scale parameter regionalization approach to scale the potential ET. In addition to the real monthly AET maps, we also tested these metrics using a synthetic true AET map simulated with a known parameter set for a randomly selected day. The results demonstrate that the newly developed four-component metric i.e. SPAtial Hybrid 4 (SPAH4) slightly outperforms conventional three-component metric i.e. SPAEF (3% better). However, SPAH4 significantly outperforms the other existing metrics i.e. 40% better than SSIM and 50% better than SPEM. We believe that other fields such as remote sensing, change detection, function space optimization and image processing can also benefit from SPAH4.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21987,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment\",\"volume\":\"76 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-024-02790-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-024-02790-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
水文平均效率(SPAEF)指标是水文界最常用的指标之一。在这项研究中,我们的目标是用其他统计指标(即峰度和地球移动距离)取代直方图匹配成分,或增加第四或第五个成分(如峰度和倾斜度),从而改进 SPAEF。现有的空间指标,即空间效率指标(SPAEF)、结构相似性指标(SSIM)和空间模式效率指标(SPEM)与新提出的指标进行了比较,以评估它们的收敛性能。摩泽尔河中尺度水文模型(mHM)用于模拟河水流量(Q)和实际蒸散量(AET)。生长季节的双源能量平衡 AET 被用作月度参考图,以计算模型的空间性能。基于中分辨率成像分光辐射计的叶面积指数被 mHM 利用,通过植物转移函数和多尺度参数区域化方法来缩放潜在蒸散发。除了真实的月度 AET 地图,我们还使用随机选择一天的已知参数集模拟的合成真实 AET 地图对这些指标进行了测试。结果表明,新开发的四分量指标 SPAtial Hybrid 4(SPAH4)略优于传统的三分量指标 SPAEF(好 3%)。不过,SPAH4 明显优于其他现有指标,即比 SSIM 高 40%,比 SPEM 高 50%。我们相信,遥感、变化检测、函数空间优化和图像处理等其他领域也能从 SPAH4 中受益。
Toward robust pattern similarity metric for distributed model evaluation
SPAtial EFficiency (SPAEF) metric is one of the most thoroughly used metrics in hydrologic community. In this study, our aim is to improve SPAEF by replacing the histogram match component with other statistical indices, i.e. kurtosis and earth mover’s distance, or by adding a fourth or fifth component such as kurtosis and skewness. The existing spatial metrics i.e. SPAtial efficiency (SPAEF), structural similarity (SSIM) and spatial pattern efficiency metric (SPEM) were compared with newly proposed metrics to assess their converging performance. The mesoscale hydrologic model (mHM) of the Moselle River is used to simulate streamflow (Q) and actual evapotranspiration (AET). The two-source energy balance AET during the growing season is used as monthly reference maps to calculate the spatial performance of the model. The moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer based leaf area index is utilized by the mHM via pedo-transfer functions and multi-scale parameter regionalization approach to scale the potential ET. In addition to the real monthly AET maps, we also tested these metrics using a synthetic true AET map simulated with a known parameter set for a randomly selected day. The results demonstrate that the newly developed four-component metric i.e. SPAtial Hybrid 4 (SPAH4) slightly outperforms conventional three-component metric i.e. SPAEF (3% better). However, SPAH4 significantly outperforms the other existing metrics i.e. 40% better than SSIM and 50% better than SPEM. We believe that other fields such as remote sensing, change detection, function space optimization and image processing can also benefit from SPAH4.
期刊介绍:
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment (SERRA) will publish research papers, reviews and technical notes on stochastic and probabilistic approaches to environmental sciences and engineering, including interactions of earth and atmospheric environments with people and ecosystems. The basic idea is to bring together research papers on stochastic modelling in various fields of environmental sciences and to provide an interdisciplinary forum for the exchange of ideas, for communicating on issues that cut across disciplinary barriers, and for the dissemination of stochastic techniques used in different fields to the community of interested researchers. Original contributions will be considered dealing with modelling (theoretical and computational), measurements and instrumentation in one or more of the following topical areas:
- Spatiotemporal analysis and mapping of natural processes.
- Enviroinformatics.
- Environmental risk assessment, reliability analysis and decision making.
- Surface and subsurface hydrology and hydraulics.
- Multiphase porous media domains and contaminant transport modelling.
- Hazardous waste site characterization.
- Stochastic turbulence and random hydrodynamic fields.
- Chaotic and fractal systems.
- Random waves and seafloor morphology.
- Stochastic atmospheric and climate processes.
- Air pollution and quality assessment research.
- Modern geostatistics.
- Mechanisms of pollutant formation, emission, exposure and absorption.
- Physical, chemical and biological analysis of human exposure from single and multiple media and routes; control and protection.
- Bioinformatics.
- Probabilistic methods in ecology and population biology.
- Epidemiological investigations.
- Models using stochastic differential equations stochastic or partial differential equations.
- Hazardous waste site characterization.