二氧化碳对红霉素体外活性的影响。

W L Dibb, A Digranes, K L Bottolfsen
{"title":"二氧化碳对红霉素体外活性的影响。","authors":"W L Dibb,&nbsp;A Digranes,&nbsp;K L Bottolfsen","doi":"10.1111/j.1699-0463.1986.tb03038.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The in vitro activity of erythromycin against clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus pyogenes and Haemophilus influenzae was examined by agar dilution and agar diffusion methods. The plates were incubated in air alone or in 8% CO2 and air. The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) measured in air alone were lower for most of the isolates, compared to those found in 8% CO2. The greatest differences in MIC values were found for H. influenzae; the MIC 50% was 0.5 mg/l in air and 4 mg/l in 8% CO2. Sensitivity testing by the agar diffusion method (ICS) showed considerable differences between results obtained in air and in 8% CO2; the inhibition zones were generally smaller in CO2. The most marked reduction in zone sizes after incubation in 8% CO2 was seen with the H. influenzae isolates; 15 out of 43 isolates moved from the \"sensitive\" to \"moderately sensitive\" group. Sensitivity determination of aerobic bacteria for erythromycin should be performed in air alone in the routine laboratory.</p>","PeriodicalId":7045,"journal":{"name":"Acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica. Section B, Microbiology","volume":"94 3","pages":"173-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1699-0463.1986.tb03038.x","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of carbon dioxide upon the in vitro activity of erythromycin.\",\"authors\":\"W L Dibb,&nbsp;A Digranes,&nbsp;K L Bottolfsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/j.1699-0463.1986.tb03038.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The in vitro activity of erythromycin against clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus pyogenes and Haemophilus influenzae was examined by agar dilution and agar diffusion methods. The plates were incubated in air alone or in 8% CO2 and air. The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) measured in air alone were lower for most of the isolates, compared to those found in 8% CO2. The greatest differences in MIC values were found for H. influenzae; the MIC 50% was 0.5 mg/l in air and 4 mg/l in 8% CO2. Sensitivity testing by the agar diffusion method (ICS) showed considerable differences between results obtained in air and in 8% CO2; the inhibition zones were generally smaller in CO2. The most marked reduction in zone sizes after incubation in 8% CO2 was seen with the H. influenzae isolates; 15 out of 43 isolates moved from the \\\"sensitive\\\" to \\\"moderately sensitive\\\" group. Sensitivity determination of aerobic bacteria for erythromycin should be performed in air alone in the routine laboratory.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica. Section B, Microbiology\",\"volume\":\"94 3\",\"pages\":\"173-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1986-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1699-0463.1986.tb03038.x\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica. Section B, Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1699-0463.1986.tb03038.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica. Section B, Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1699-0463.1986.tb03038.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

采用琼脂稀释法和琼脂扩散法检测红霉素对临床分离的金黄色葡萄球菌、表皮葡萄球菌、肺炎链球菌、化脓性链球菌和流感嗜血杆菌的体外活性。培养皿单独在空气中或在8%的二氧化碳和空气中孵育。与在8% CO2中发现的菌株相比,单独在空气中测量的大多数菌株的最低抑菌浓度(mic)较低。流感嗜血杆菌的MIC值差异最大;MIC 50%在空气中为0.5 mg/l,在8% CO2中为4 mg/l。琼脂扩散法(ICS)的敏感性试验表明,在空气中和在8% CO2中得到的结果有相当大的差异;在CO2中,抑制区一般较小。在8%的CO2中孵育后,流感嗜血杆菌分离株的区大小减少最为显著;43个分离株中有15个从“敏感”组变为“中度敏感”组。需氧菌对红霉素的敏感性测定应在常规实验室单独空气中进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of carbon dioxide upon the in vitro activity of erythromycin.

The in vitro activity of erythromycin against clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus pyogenes and Haemophilus influenzae was examined by agar dilution and agar diffusion methods. The plates were incubated in air alone or in 8% CO2 and air. The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) measured in air alone were lower for most of the isolates, compared to those found in 8% CO2. The greatest differences in MIC values were found for H. influenzae; the MIC 50% was 0.5 mg/l in air and 4 mg/l in 8% CO2. Sensitivity testing by the agar diffusion method (ICS) showed considerable differences between results obtained in air and in 8% CO2; the inhibition zones were generally smaller in CO2. The most marked reduction in zone sizes after incubation in 8% CO2 was seen with the H. influenzae isolates; 15 out of 43 isolates moved from the "sensitive" to "moderately sensitive" group. Sensitivity determination of aerobic bacteria for erythromycin should be performed in air alone in the routine laboratory.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信