各种信息情景对基于层相关性传播的可解释卷积神经网络用于空气处理机组故障诊断的影响

IF 6.1 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Chenglong Xiong, Guannan Li, Ying Yan, Hanyuan Zhang, Chengliang Xu, Liang Chen
{"title":"各种信息情景对基于层相关性传播的可解释卷积神经网络用于空气处理机组故障诊断的影响","authors":"Chenglong Xiong, Guannan Li, Ying Yan, Hanyuan Zhang, Chengliang Xu, Liang Chen","doi":"10.1007/s12273-024-1154-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Deep learning (DL), especially convolutional neural networks (CNNs), has been widely applied in air handling unit (AHU) fault diagnosis (FD). However, its application faces two major challenges. Firstly, the accessibility of operational state variables for AHU systems is limited in practical, and the effectiveness and applicability of existing DL methods for diagnosis require further validation. Secondly, the interpretability performance of DL models under various information scenarios needs further exploration. To address these challenges, this study utilized publicly available ASHRAE RP-1312 AHU fault data and employed CNNs to construct three FD models under three various information scenarios. Furthermore, the layer-wise relevance propagation (LRP) method was used to interpret and explain the effects of these three various information scenarios on the CNN models. An <i>R</i>-threshold was proposed to systematically differentiate diagnostic criteria, which further elucidates the intrinsic reasons behind correct and incorrect decisions made by the models. The results showed that the CNN-based diagnostic models demonstrated good applicability under the three various information scenarios, with an average diagnostic accuracy of 98.55%. The LRP method provided good interpretation and explanation for understanding the decision mechanism of CNN models for the unlimited information scenarios. For the very limited information scenario, since the variables are restricted, although LRP can reveal key variables in the model’s decision-making process, these key variables have certain limitations in terms of data and physical explanations for further improving the model’s interpretation. Finally, an in-depth analysis of model parameters—such as the number of convolutional layers, learning rate, <i>β</i> parameters, and training set size—was conducted to examine their impact on the interpretative results. This study contributes to clarifying the effects of various information scenarios on the diagnostic performance and interpretability of LRP-based CNN models for AHU FD, which helps provide improved reliability of DL models in practical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":49226,"journal":{"name":"Building Simulation","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of various information scenarios on layer-wise relevance propagation-based interpretable convolutional neural networks for air handling unit fault diagnosis\",\"authors\":\"Chenglong Xiong, Guannan Li, Ying Yan, Hanyuan Zhang, Chengliang Xu, Liang Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12273-024-1154-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Deep learning (DL), especially convolutional neural networks (CNNs), has been widely applied in air handling unit (AHU) fault diagnosis (FD). However, its application faces two major challenges. Firstly, the accessibility of operational state variables for AHU systems is limited in practical, and the effectiveness and applicability of existing DL methods for diagnosis require further validation. Secondly, the interpretability performance of DL models under various information scenarios needs further exploration. To address these challenges, this study utilized publicly available ASHRAE RP-1312 AHU fault data and employed CNNs to construct three FD models under three various information scenarios. Furthermore, the layer-wise relevance propagation (LRP) method was used to interpret and explain the effects of these three various information scenarios on the CNN models. An <i>R</i>-threshold was proposed to systematically differentiate diagnostic criteria, which further elucidates the intrinsic reasons behind correct and incorrect decisions made by the models. The results showed that the CNN-based diagnostic models demonstrated good applicability under the three various information scenarios, with an average diagnostic accuracy of 98.55%. The LRP method provided good interpretation and explanation for understanding the decision mechanism of CNN models for the unlimited information scenarios. For the very limited information scenario, since the variables are restricted, although LRP can reveal key variables in the model’s decision-making process, these key variables have certain limitations in terms of data and physical explanations for further improving the model’s interpretation. Finally, an in-depth analysis of model parameters—such as the number of convolutional layers, learning rate, <i>β</i> parameters, and training set size—was conducted to examine their impact on the interpretative results. This study contributes to clarifying the effects of various information scenarios on the diagnostic performance and interpretability of LRP-based CNN models for AHU FD, which helps provide improved reliability of DL models in practical applications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Building Simulation\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Building Simulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-024-1154-1\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Building Simulation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-024-1154-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

深度学习(DL),尤其是卷积神经网络(CNN),已广泛应用于空气处理机组(AHU)故障诊断(FD)。然而,其应用面临两大挑战。首先,AHU 系统运行状态变量的可获取性在实践中受到限制,现有 DL 诊断方法的有效性和适用性需要进一步验证。其次,需要进一步探讨 DL 模型在各种信息情景下的可解释性。为了应对这些挑战,本研究利用公开的 ASHRAE RP-1312 AHU 故障数据,采用 CNN 构建了三种不同信息情景下的 FD 模型。此外,还使用了层相关性传播(LRP)方法来解释和说明这三种不同信息情景对 CNN 模型的影响。还提出了一个 R 门限来系统地区分诊断标准,这进一步阐明了模型做出正确和错误决定背后的内在原因。结果表明,基于 CNN 的诊断模型在三种不同的信息场景下都表现出良好的适用性,平均诊断准确率为 98.55%。LRP 方法为理解 CNN 模型在无限信息情景下的决策机制提供了很好的解释和说明。对于信息非常有限的情景,由于变量受到限制,虽然 LRP 可以揭示模型决策过程中的关键变量,但这些关键变量在数据和物理解释方面存在一定的局限性,无法进一步完善模型的解释。最后,对模型参数进行了深入分析,如卷积层数、学习率、β 参数和训练集大小等,以研究它们对解释结果的影响。这项研究有助于阐明各种信息情景对基于 LRP 的空调机组故障诊断 CNN 模型的诊断性能和可解释性的影响,从而有助于提高 DL 模型在实际应用中的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of various information scenarios on layer-wise relevance propagation-based interpretable convolutional neural networks for air handling unit fault diagnosis

Deep learning (DL), especially convolutional neural networks (CNNs), has been widely applied in air handling unit (AHU) fault diagnosis (FD). However, its application faces two major challenges. Firstly, the accessibility of operational state variables for AHU systems is limited in practical, and the effectiveness and applicability of existing DL methods for diagnosis require further validation. Secondly, the interpretability performance of DL models under various information scenarios needs further exploration. To address these challenges, this study utilized publicly available ASHRAE RP-1312 AHU fault data and employed CNNs to construct three FD models under three various information scenarios. Furthermore, the layer-wise relevance propagation (LRP) method was used to interpret and explain the effects of these three various information scenarios on the CNN models. An R-threshold was proposed to systematically differentiate diagnostic criteria, which further elucidates the intrinsic reasons behind correct and incorrect decisions made by the models. The results showed that the CNN-based diagnostic models demonstrated good applicability under the three various information scenarios, with an average diagnostic accuracy of 98.55%. The LRP method provided good interpretation and explanation for understanding the decision mechanism of CNN models for the unlimited information scenarios. For the very limited information scenario, since the variables are restricted, although LRP can reveal key variables in the model’s decision-making process, these key variables have certain limitations in terms of data and physical explanations for further improving the model’s interpretation. Finally, an in-depth analysis of model parameters—such as the number of convolutional layers, learning rate, β parameters, and training set size—was conducted to examine their impact on the interpretative results. This study contributes to clarifying the effects of various information scenarios on the diagnostic performance and interpretability of LRP-based CNN models for AHU FD, which helps provide improved reliability of DL models in practical applications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Building Simulation
Building Simulation THERMODYNAMICS-CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
16.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Building Simulation: An International Journal publishes original, high quality, peer-reviewed research papers and review articles dealing with modeling and simulation of buildings including their systems. The goal is to promote the field of building science and technology to such a level that modeling will eventually be used in every aspect of building construction as a routine instead of an exception. Of particular interest are papers that reflect recent developments and applications of modeling tools and their impact on advances of building science and technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信