跨学科研究:学术界在多大程度上响应了与产业界、政府和非营利组织等社会利益相关者更紧密合作的号召?

Philip James Purnell
{"title":"跨学科研究:学术界在多大程度上响应了与产业界、政府和非营利组织等社会利益相关者更紧密合作的号召?","authors":"Philip James Purnell","doi":"arxiv-2408.14024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Transdisciplinary research, the co-creation of scientific knowledge by\nmultiple stakeholders, is considered essential for addressing major societal\nproblems. Research policy makers and academic leaders frequently call for\ncloser collaboration between academia and societal stakeholders to address the\ngrand challenges of our time. This bibliometric study evaluates progress in\ncollaboration between academia and three societal stakeholders: industry,\ngovernment, and nonprofit organisations. It analyses the level of co-publishing\nbetween academia and these societal stakeholders over the period 2013-2022. We\nfound that research collaboration between academia and all stakeholder types\nstudied grew in absolute terms. However, academia-industry collaboration\ndeclined 16% relative to overall academic output while academia-government and\nacademia-nonprofit collaboration grew at roughly the same pace as academic\noutput. Country and field of research breakdowns revealed wide variance. In\nlight of previous work, we consider potential explanations for the gap between\npolicymakers' aspirations and the real global trends. This study is a useful\ndemonstration of large scale, quantitative bibliometric techniques for research\npolicymakers to track the impact of decisions related to funding, intellectual\nproperty law, and nonprofit support.","PeriodicalId":501285,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Digital Libraries","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transdisciplinary research: How much is academia heeding the call to work more closely with societal stakeholders such as industry, government, and nonprofits?\",\"authors\":\"Philip James Purnell\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2408.14024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Transdisciplinary research, the co-creation of scientific knowledge by\\nmultiple stakeholders, is considered essential for addressing major societal\\nproblems. Research policy makers and academic leaders frequently call for\\ncloser collaboration between academia and societal stakeholders to address the\\ngrand challenges of our time. This bibliometric study evaluates progress in\\ncollaboration between academia and three societal stakeholders: industry,\\ngovernment, and nonprofit organisations. It analyses the level of co-publishing\\nbetween academia and these societal stakeholders over the period 2013-2022. We\\nfound that research collaboration between academia and all stakeholder types\\nstudied grew in absolute terms. However, academia-industry collaboration\\ndeclined 16% relative to overall academic output while academia-government and\\nacademia-nonprofit collaboration grew at roughly the same pace as academic\\noutput. Country and field of research breakdowns revealed wide variance. In\\nlight of previous work, we consider potential explanations for the gap between\\npolicymakers' aspirations and the real global trends. This study is a useful\\ndemonstration of large scale, quantitative bibliometric techniques for research\\npolicymakers to track the impact of decisions related to funding, intellectual\\nproperty law, and nonprofit support.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - CS - Digital Libraries\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - CS - Digital Libraries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.14024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Digital Libraries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.14024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

跨学科研究,即由多个利益相关方共同创造科学知识,被认为是解决重大社会问题的关键。研究政策制定者和学术带头人经常呼吁学术界与社会利益相关者开展更紧密的合作,以应对我们这个时代的重大挑战。这项文献计量学研究评估了学术界与三个社会利益相关者(工业界、政府和非营利组织)之间的合作进展。它分析了 2013-2022 年间学术界与这些社会利益相关者之间的合作出版水平。我们发现,学术界与所研究的所有利益相关者类型之间的研究合作在绝对值上都有所增长。然而,相对于整体学术产出而言,学术界与产业界的合作下降了 16%,而学术界与政府和学术界与非营利组织的合作与学术产出的增长速度基本持平。国家和研究领域的细分显示了巨大的差异。根据以往的工作,我们考虑了政策制定者的愿望与实际全球趋势之间差距的潜在解释。这项研究为研究政策制定者跟踪与资金、知识产权法和非营利性支持相关的决策的影响提供了大规模、定量文献计量技术的有益证明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transdisciplinary research: How much is academia heeding the call to work more closely with societal stakeholders such as industry, government, and nonprofits?
Transdisciplinary research, the co-creation of scientific knowledge by multiple stakeholders, is considered essential for addressing major societal problems. Research policy makers and academic leaders frequently call for closer collaboration between academia and societal stakeholders to address the grand challenges of our time. This bibliometric study evaluates progress in collaboration between academia and three societal stakeholders: industry, government, and nonprofit organisations. It analyses the level of co-publishing between academia and these societal stakeholders over the period 2013-2022. We found that research collaboration between academia and all stakeholder types studied grew in absolute terms. However, academia-industry collaboration declined 16% relative to overall academic output while academia-government and academia-nonprofit collaboration grew at roughly the same pace as academic output. Country and field of research breakdowns revealed wide variance. In light of previous work, we consider potential explanations for the gap between policymakers' aspirations and the real global trends. This study is a useful demonstration of large scale, quantitative bibliometric techniques for research policymakers to track the impact of decisions related to funding, intellectual property law, and nonprofit support.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信