实践中的包容性：哥伦比亚和平进程中多轨并行的 "零敲碎打 "式包容

IF 2.3 2区社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI:10.1080/17502977.2024.2380955

Isabel Bramsen, Lisa Strömbom

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了哥伦比亚和平进程中的包容性/多轨关系。文章从设计原则和进程动态的角度对包容性进行了理论分析，并分析了它们是如何在哥伦比亚和平进程中实施的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Inclusivity in Practice: Patchworks of Inclusion at Multiple Tracks in the Colombian Peace Process

This article investigates the inclusion/multi-track nexus in the Colombian peace process. It theorizes inclusion in terms of design principles and process dynamics, analysing how they are enacted a...

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-

CiteScore

5.20

自引率

20.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding is a cross-disciplinary journal devoted to critical analysis of international intervention, focussing on interactions and practices that shape, influence and transform states and societies. In 21st century political practice, states and other actors increasingly strive to transplant what they see as normatively progressive political orders to other contexts. Accordingly, JISB focuses on the complex interconnections and mutually shaping interactions between donor and recipient communities within military, economic, social, or other interventional contexts, and welcomes perspectives on political life of, and beyond, European state-building processes. The journal brings together academics and practitioners from cross-disciplinary backgrounds, including international relations, political science, political economy, sociology, international law, social anthropology, geography, and regional studies. The editors are particularly interested in specific or comparative in-depth analyses of contemporary or historical interventions and state-building processes that are grounded in careful fieldwork and/or innovative methodologies. Multi or cross-disciplinary contributions and theoretically challenging pieces that broaden the study of intervention and state building to encompass processes of decision-making, or the complex interplay between actors on the ground, are especially encouraged.