Timothy J. Fahey, Alexis K. Heinz, Rachel Mathisson, Catherine Fahey, Joseph B. Yavitt
{"title":"有多少土壤碳来自木质碎屑?13C 融入土壤有机物质的十年研究","authors":"Timothy J. Fahey, Alexis K. Heinz, Rachel Mathisson, Catherine Fahey, Joseph B. Yavitt","doi":"10.1007/s10021-024-00926-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The importance of woody detritus as a source of soil organic matter is not well constrained. We quantified the recovery of <sup>13</sup>C derived from isotopic-enriched sugar maple wood in various C fractions of two temperate forest soils in central New York, USA. Decay rates of small woody debris were quite rapid (k = 0.362 to 0.477 per year) and after 10 years less than 1% of the original wood mass remained in incubation bags. After six years we recovered only 0.26% (± 0.025) of the added <sup>13</sup>C in the upper 5 cm of underlying soil. After 10 years this recovery declined to 0.11% (± 0.020) indicating substantial lability of retained SOC; most of this decline occurred from year 6 to 8 in the 1–5 cm depth increment, suggesting that the residue was quite stable at 10 years. The largest fraction of <sup>13</sup>C was recovered in microaggregates (45%), especially those occluded within macroaggregates (30%), with a smaller proportion associated with the silt + clay fraction (20%). These proportions did not change significantly from year 6 to 10. Faster decay and higher <sup>13</sup>C recovery were coincident with abundant saproxylic invertebrates from Scarabaeidae at one of the sites. We conclude that small woody debris is a minor source of stable SOC in these temperate forests (that is, less than 1% of annual SOC accumulation).</p>","PeriodicalId":11406,"journal":{"name":"Ecosystems","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Much Soil Carbon is Derived from Woody Detritus? A Ten-Year Study of 13C Incorporation into Soil Organic Matter\",\"authors\":\"Timothy J. Fahey, Alexis K. Heinz, Rachel Mathisson, Catherine Fahey, Joseph B. Yavitt\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10021-024-00926-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The importance of woody detritus as a source of soil organic matter is not well constrained. We quantified the recovery of <sup>13</sup>C derived from isotopic-enriched sugar maple wood in various C fractions of two temperate forest soils in central New York, USA. Decay rates of small woody debris were quite rapid (k = 0.362 to 0.477 per year) and after 10 years less than 1% of the original wood mass remained in incubation bags. After six years we recovered only 0.26% (± 0.025) of the added <sup>13</sup>C in the upper 5 cm of underlying soil. After 10 years this recovery declined to 0.11% (± 0.020) indicating substantial lability of retained SOC; most of this decline occurred from year 6 to 8 in the 1–5 cm depth increment, suggesting that the residue was quite stable at 10 years. The largest fraction of <sup>13</sup>C was recovered in microaggregates (45%), especially those occluded within macroaggregates (30%), with a smaller proportion associated with the silt + clay fraction (20%). These proportions did not change significantly from year 6 to 10. Faster decay and higher <sup>13</sup>C recovery were coincident with abundant saproxylic invertebrates from Scarabaeidae at one of the sites. We conclude that small woody debris is a minor source of stable SOC in these temperate forests (that is, less than 1% of annual SOC accumulation).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11406,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecosystems\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecosystems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-024-00926-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosystems","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-024-00926-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
How Much Soil Carbon is Derived from Woody Detritus? A Ten-Year Study of 13C Incorporation into Soil Organic Matter
The importance of woody detritus as a source of soil organic matter is not well constrained. We quantified the recovery of 13C derived from isotopic-enriched sugar maple wood in various C fractions of two temperate forest soils in central New York, USA. Decay rates of small woody debris were quite rapid (k = 0.362 to 0.477 per year) and after 10 years less than 1% of the original wood mass remained in incubation bags. After six years we recovered only 0.26% (± 0.025) of the added 13C in the upper 5 cm of underlying soil. After 10 years this recovery declined to 0.11% (± 0.020) indicating substantial lability of retained SOC; most of this decline occurred from year 6 to 8 in the 1–5 cm depth increment, suggesting that the residue was quite stable at 10 years. The largest fraction of 13C was recovered in microaggregates (45%), especially those occluded within macroaggregates (30%), with a smaller proportion associated with the silt + clay fraction (20%). These proportions did not change significantly from year 6 to 10. Faster decay and higher 13C recovery were coincident with abundant saproxylic invertebrates from Scarabaeidae at one of the sites. We conclude that small woody debris is a minor source of stable SOC in these temperate forests (that is, less than 1% of annual SOC accumulation).
期刊介绍:
The study and management of ecosystems represent the most dynamic field of contemporary ecology. Ecosystem research bridges fundamental ecology and environmental ecology and environmental problem-solving, and spans boundaries of scale, discipline and perspective. Ecosystems features a distinguished team of editors-in-chief and an outstanding international editorial board, and is seen worldwide as a vital home for publishing significant research as well as editorials, mini-reviews and special features.